Of course, from the phone maker standpoint this would put a crimp in the yearly upgrade cycle… Which would make a small additional dose rate worth it, perhaps, just to see them trying to rationalize it.
I don’t see 28k year lifetimes, though. Apart from the half-life issue, most devices like this ultimately rely on a semiconductor junction between materials with different dopings to convert something – heat, ionization, light – to an electrical potential. Over time the dopants will diffuse across the boundary layer and the device will fail. This same phenomenon is why solar cells, for instance, have a limited lifespan.
There has been talk about the Radioactive Diamond Batteries on some of the trade magazine sites for a while, and I’ve leaned toward the approach of “show me a working prototype and some evidence” about the story. I obviously don’t expect them to show me evidence the battery actually worked for 28,000 years, but some good data to demonstrate why they think their particular approach can last that long.
There’s a long history of high tech startups trying to get people to invest in them when there really isn’t anything there that justifies it.
I know I promised no more complaining about taxes, but the Democrats ruined that less than 24 hours later by proposing a new tax credit for people claiming the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC). This Read more…
A Youtuber who calls his account Flat Circle History has been producing a series called “The Next World War” for the past year. As of now, there are 22 episodes of 10 to 20 minutes Read more…
I would say that FPSRussia did a fair job of predicting Russian drone warfare, don’t you? I said then, and I still think now, that the ATF wanted his channel off the air, so they Read more…
3 Comments
it's just Boris · April 6, 2021 at 7:21 am
Of course, from the phone maker standpoint this would put a crimp in the yearly upgrade cycle… Which would make a small additional dose rate worth it, perhaps, just to see them trying to rationalize it.
I don’t see 28k year lifetimes, though. Apart from the half-life issue, most devices like this ultimately rely on a semiconductor junction between materials with different dopings to convert something – heat, ionization, light – to an electrical potential. Over time the dopants will diffuse across the boundary layer and the device will fail. This same phenomenon is why solar cells, for instance, have a limited lifespan.
SiG · April 6, 2021 at 9:41 am
There has been talk about the Radioactive Diamond Batteries on some of the trade magazine sites for a while, and I’ve leaned toward the approach of “show me a working prototype and some evidence” about the story. I obviously don’t expect them to show me evidence the battery actually worked for 28,000 years, but some good data to demonstrate why they think their particular approach can last that long.
There’s a long history of high tech startups trying to get people to invest in them when there really isn’t anything there that justifies it.
it's just Boris · April 6, 2021 at 9:45 pm
Agreed.
All I want for Christmas is a Shipstone…
Comments are closed.