Crime

Jury Duty

What would you say, if you happened to get jury duty on this case:

On December 17, 2015, Ronald Exantus broke into a Kentucky home, stabbed four members of the Tipton family while they slept, with 6 year old Logan dying from his stab wounds. This fucking animal stabbed the child so forcefully the knife used was bent, the tip broken. Police quickly arrested him. A jury later found Exantus not guilty by reason of insanity on murder and burglary charges and guilty but mentally ill on assault charges involving the surviving family members.

Ronald Exantus served 11 years, nine months and 18 days before being ruled as “cured,” and while being rehabilitated, he earned enough credit to be released. He was released July 29. This is not the case I am asking about. No one deserves the blame, except that murderer.

However, the Father has some blame to assume of his own. As I have said many times, a man’s duty is to his immediate family. One of the core tenets to being a man is the protection of the lives of those who have been placed in your care. The father left the door to the house unlocked, no alarm, no real means of slowing or stopping his family’s attacker. The animal who stabbed him, his two daughters, and killed his son. There is only one clear path for that man, and I support him.

“The judge and jury gave this monster a slap on the wrist while handing down a life sentence to my family,” Logan’s father, Dean Tipton, wrote on Facebook after Exantus’ release.

I agree. As the man who should have protected his family, Mr. Tipton failed them because he took no steps whatsoever to ensure their safety. He has had to live with that for over a decade. So what has he decided to do? What he should have done more than a decade ago.

Exantus was briefly released on mandatory reentry supervision in October 2025 before moving to Florida, where authorities said he violated the conditions of his supervision by failing to register as a convicted felon.

“I’ve had my talks with God cause I’m not afraid to tell you all, I told the court — if I ever cross paths with him, I will kill the man. I will kill him where he stands,” he previously told WKYT.

Don’t talk about it- do it. This is the only path forward. Had he done so, his child would be driving and thinking about college by now. Instead, he is dead, and this murderer is walking around a free man. That isn’t justice. My children are grown adults. However, if someone were to attack my wife, there would only be one way to deal with this.

I wouldn’t just wait and hope to cross paths with him, I would hunt this animal down. I would find him. Knowing that, I would remember that if Mr. Tipton were to happen to catch up to this man, and I found myself on the jury. So what would I do? I would make sure he didn’t spend a day in prison. If I could (which I know I couldn’t in this scenario), I would vote to pay him a reward for ridding us of this scum. There is only one way to make sure he doesn’t happen to go crazy and kill another child.

I have alarms. I am armed nearly all of the time. If someone happened to do that to my family, and I found myself in the position of having to watch him become a free man after murdering my wife or 6 year old child, I know what I would do.

The law is there to prevent vigilante justice and ensure the guilty receive a fair trial. That no longer the case. Our legal system is a farce and is no longer concerned with justice.

By Divemedic, ago

Can’t Count

Isn’t it odd that EVERY time an election has some sort of problem counting votes, it’s the most socialist candidate that comes out on top?

It looks like November’s election is going to be “We don’t have any ideas you would like, but we aren’t Donald Trump, so you can feel safe in voting for us.”

The growing rift within the caucus has some mainstream Democrats fretting that progressives like El-Sayed will be tough sells to general election voters in November. Others argue that their “big tent” can include more differing opinions as long as there’s unity against President Trump.

Come to find out, Islam won the global war on terror by claiming to be communist and calling all criticism as “racism” and “Islamophobia.”

By Divemedic, ago

Not a Free Pass

For those who read here, you know that I remain opposed to the death penalty. Not because killers don’t deserve it, but because I don’t trust our legal system not to execute the innocent. Still, the left wing press (redundancy alert) is up in arms because today is the day that Florida executes an 80 year old man. The press is claiming that it’s cruel to execute a disabled 80 year old.

He wasn’t 80 when he was convicted and sentenced 50 years ago. The man has delayed his punishment with appeal after appeal for five decades. While I am opposed to the death penalty, what we have now is a farce, with inmates spending 30, 40, and even 50 years abusing the court system. The government can abuse the legal process, but so can criminals.

If you are going to have a death penalty, there should be a limit to the number of appeals. Put all of your appeals into one motion that must be considered and ruled upon at once. Five year limit.

By Divemedic, ago

Discuss

Watch the video below. This apparently happened in the Home Depot in Ocala Florida. It is right down the street from Silver Springs, which is why you hear them refer to that. Below the post and video is my opinion. Discuss.

I don’t think the people in this video are stupid at all. He kept tapping her phone with his, while causing the phone to chirp each time. Then he made various claims of “It’s charity” and “I need money” then later, he said “I only took a hundred”

In my mind, this creates the reasonable belief that he is somehow using his phone to steal money, or at the very least, some sort of information from her phone. He is intentionally creating that belief in an attempt to get content for his stupid social media post that he is obviously filming with smart glasses. Many people’s phones contain financial information or automatic payment apps. It’s completely reasonable to believe he is using his phone to steal money, and he even made statements to that fact.

Once that reasonable belief exists in my mind, I am holding him for police. This is at the very least a reasonable belief that theft is taking place. Florida statute 776.031:

A person is justified in using or threatening to use force, except deadly force, against another when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes that such conduct is necessary to prevent or terminate the other’s trespass on, or other tortious or criminal interference with, either real property other than a dwelling or personal property, lawfully in his or her possession or in the possession of another who is a member of his or her immediate family or household or of a person whose property he or she has a legal duty to protect. A person who uses or threatens to use force in accordance with this subsection does not have a duty to retreat before using or threatening to use such force.

I am tackling this guy’s bitch ass. If he offers ANY physical force to resist my apprehension of him, it is now reasonable for me to believe that his theft has now become robbery. I am drawing a gun on his stupid ass. Why? Because as soon as he uses force, that becomes a reasonable fear of imminent commission of a forcible felony, as in robbery.

All of this for cheap laughs. This video would have been much funnier if it had ended with the videographer getting his ass kicked, or proned out on the ground looking down the barrel of that old man’s handgun.

Once it turns out he was placing me in fear for Internet laughs, my lawyer would be instructed to sue this asshole for intentional infliction of emotional distress. That would be funny as well.

By Divemedic, ago

Legal Blood

Years ago, when I was still a paramedic with the fire department, we would occasionally draw blood from patients and turn it over to the police. More than once, I drew a resisting patient’s blood while a police officer held a taser to their neck.

Why would I do that, you ask?

Florida has long had a specific statute, § 316.1933, covering crashes involving death or serious bodily injury. It provides that when an officer has probable cause to believe an impaired driver caused a death or serious bodily injury, the officer shall require a blood test. The statute also expressly authorizes the officer to use reasonable force if necessary, and it authorizes physicians, nurses, paramedics, and other qualified personnel to draw the blood at the officer’s request. It also grants immunity to those assisting with the draw when acting under the statute at the direction of a law enforcement officer.

For many years, the prevailing view, based largely on the earlier U.S. Supreme Court decision in Schmerber v. California (1966), was that alcohol dissipating from the bloodstream created an exigency justifying a warrantless blood draw in many DUI cases. The person’s liver was literally destroying the evidence every minute, and the delay in obtaining a warrant was the difference between a DUI homicide and a drunk walking away.

I understood why the law was there, and I also disagreed with it. My favorite quote is “better 1,000 guilty go free than 1 innocent person be convicted.” The truth is that the DUI law changes have had no discernible effect on the rate of traffic fatalities. Of course, the fact that the government uses traffic offenses as a cash cow, with Florida making $100 million a year from traffic tickets has nothing to do with it. In California, it was discovered that 1,600 DUI checkpoints yielded only 3,200 DUI arrests (two per checkpoint), but resulted in $40 million in traffic tickets and 24,000 vehicle confiscations. Cops also won, being paid $30 million in overtime to staff the checkpoints.

That was the law when I retired from the fire department in 2011. Then in 2013, the Supreme Court decided Missouri v. McNeely. The Court held that the natural metabolization of alcohol by itself does not automatically create an exigency. Instead, officers generally need a warrant unless the facts of the particular case make obtaining one impractical.

After McNeely, Florida appellate courts repeatedly held that, despite § 316.1933, the State still had to show either:

  • a warrant,
  • valid consent,
  • or a recognized exception to the warrant requirement (such as genuine exigent circumstances).

By Divemedic, ago

Not Buying It

The gaslighting is real. This guy, part of an Antifa terror cell and a wanna-be killer tranny Bradford “Meagan” Morris says, well, I will let you read it:

“The original intent was just to show solidarity with the detainees who hopefully lift their spirits with a fun fireworks display and go home,” she told KERA. “If the officer got shot by someone, that person was acting alone. But they want to punish all of us.”

A fun fireworks display? That’s what you are calling that? They had a planning meeting. Conducted recon. Did a weapons check over the radio. Then tossed fireworks into the detention center to lure the ICE agents out. Then they shot a cop, and would have shot more, but Antifa tranny fags can’t shoot for shit.

I remember 2020. You assholes were tossing fireworks as makeshift anti-personnel rounds. That’s called constructive possession and throwing of a destructive device. We haven’t forgotten that, and I don’t believe for a second you were doing this as a crowd pleasing display. Fuck you- rot in there. The only better outcome would have been if the cops had smoked your shit.

I call it like I see it, and that’s how I am calling this one.

By Divemedic, ago

Another Tough Guy

Karmelo Anthony was found guilty after only three hours of deliberations. Of course, there are tons of his fellow blacks out there claiming he should get a new trial because his attorney was incompetent. or that he is going to win on appeal. That isn’t how it works, but then again, they don’t understand the law any better than they understand self defense.

By Divemedic, ago