Remember the woman who was fired by Chase bank after stealing a trash can? Her resume was posted online, and I managed to secure a copy of it. It appears to be an older resume from before her time at The Infatuation and then Chase, but I’m posting it here to show all of you what DEI does to get people positions they are nowhere near qualified for.
This woman has an associate’s degree from a community college in Broward County, Florida, but is sitting there in an executive position for Chase bank while pulling down $250,000 or more per year. She most recently held the title of Executive Director of Community and Industry Engagement for Card and Connected Commerce, a bullshit role that does little except give jobs to uneducated people based upon race. She assumed that job after working on diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives at companies including The Infatuation (which Chase acquired), and Squarespace.
As a manager who has read many resumes, this one is pure fluff. No direct examples of anything, just vague over arching nonsense. Her resume is mostly a string of stupid buzzwords, yet her resume shows 5 dots for “communication.”
This is pure DEI bullshit, where people get jobs they are totally unqualified for, except for the color of their skin.
It’s time to declare New York City to be in a state of rebellion.
BREAKING: Mamdani vows to protect illegal alien Haitians and Syrians following SCOTUS ruling
“To have people have their freedom put into Jeopardy by the actions of a Supreme Court and a federal administration… it’s something that we will not ever accept.” pic.twitter.com/5iJeOhFxnw
Demand the Governor of New York bring her wayward city under control
If she fails to do so, declare the entire state of New York to be in a state of rebellion
Declare all New York congressional seats to therefore be vacant
Declare martial law in the states under rebellion and suspend habias corpus.
Ask the other sanctuary states if they would like to continue on their path
It won’t be the first time a Republican President did so.
Either that, or once the 2026 election has been lost (as it likely will be) states like Florida should simply declare Federal law to not be enforceable within their borders. Machine guns and missiles for everyone.
Armed citizens SHOULD NOT be getting involved in gunfights involving police and criminals.
1) The police don’t know you from Adam so your presence with a gun only cause more confusion and the likely hood a innocent person including yourself gets injured
2) Most “armed citizens” I don’t care how many times you go to the range and shoot have no idea what it feels like when rounds are flying your way. Again its likely you would make the situation worse
3) Armed citizens should only use their guns in a defensive manner. This shit isn’t a movie!
4) Police have protections the average citizen does not. You shoot and kill anyone whether you are “trying to help or not” and you are civilly liable unless your life was in direct danger
Let’s address this idiocy by the numbers:
Don’t try to stop criminals from engaging in spree shootings, or the police might kill you because they don’t care whether or not they are shooting the correct person. How is that an indictment of private citizens and not the police?
Most cops don’t have any idea of what it’s like to be shot at. Less than 25% of cops are ever fire their weapons. It’s even lower for veterans. Even considering the lengthy GWOT, only 10–20% of all U.S. veterans have ever been engaged in combat, and most of those were IEDs or something other than small arms fire.
OK, and? The same is true for cops.
That’s incorrect. I can shoot to prevent someone else’s life from being threatened. I can shoot to stop a forcible felony. So that’s not exactly accurate, because real life is far more nuanced than you leftist simpletons can comprehend. Even so, cops shouldn’t be shooting people unless lives are in danger either.
Just because you were in the military doesn’t mean that you have more knowledge, legal or firearms related, than anyone else. It also doesn’t grant you rights or powers that anyone else doesn’t also have. So sit down and be quiet, adults are speaking.
The latest viral video is of a man who takes his young daughters into an Alabama gas station restroom. After ensuring that there are no women inside, he takes them into the women’s restroom. A man then comes in to the bathroom, causing a scene and calls the police. The woman in the background is an employee of the gas station, who doesn’t seem to care that the man and his daughters are in there and is just trying to smooth things over.
My unsolicited take on this viral video is that it’s sometimes very hard to know what to do in these situations.
I once took my son in a men’s bathroom because the women’s was occupied and he desperately needed to go. He was 3. A man walked in shortly after us and completely…
It seems that everyone is falling into one of two camps:
The dad has no business being in the women’s restroom for any reason. Bring your young daughters into the men’s restroom.
The daughters shouldn’t be exposed to the men’s restroom. It’s fine for the dad to bring them in there.
Me? I don’t care which. His daughters, his parenting style. What I think everyone is missing here is this:
Why in the hell is the male Karen (Darren?) even worried about this to the point of calling the cops and causing a scene? The store employees don’t care, so why does it matter so much to him? He raises such a commotion that the poor little girls are scared and crying. He attempts to gain police sympathy by claiming his wife is waiting to use the restroom with her mother, who is ill and on oxygen.
Guess what? The police have other things to do than deal with Darren’s meltdown. They aren’t going to do shit because no laws have been broken. Why does it matter that his mother in law is on oxygen? Is there some life saving equipment in that restroom that will improve her respiration? Or is Darren an ass who needs a good ass kicking? I’m guess the latter, and he will get what he’s looking for if he keeps getting in people’s faces and pushing them like he does at 1:50 in the video.
The man stayed for police, who confirmed that no law had been broken.
UPDATE—Police arrived at gas station and confirmed the dad was allowed to take his 2 girls into restroom.
A man called 911 because he thought it was illegal—even with no family option available.
— LongTime🤓FirstTime👨💻 (@LongTimeHistory) June 17, 2026
Honestly, the police should respond to find a man that had just received a face full of pepper spray and me with that video demanding charges against him for assault.
When the police did arrive, they pointed out to the dad that it could be perceived as a man trying to perve in the women’s restroom. This is totally different than men wearing dresses hanging out in the women’s restroom because they want everyone else to play along with their delusion. Anyone who says they can’t see the difference is either lying or a complete retard.
Watch the videos and ask which of the two men above would YOU rather have for a neighbor?
Yet the Constitution plainly allows for letters of Marque. When a letter of Marque was issued, called a commission, it would describe the vessel that it had been issued to and its master. The ship was described by the guns mounted. Here is an example:
In other words, the commission didn’t authorize the master and his vessel to mount guns- they were already there. All it did was authorize the master to use the guns already mounted on that vessel to act as a privateer.
So, we know from the historical record that the founders placed no limit on the lethality or number of weapons. Trying to spin it into “well, weapons that can destroy a city aren’t useful for defending a state, so they can be banned” is no different than claiming the 2A only applies to muskets. It’s simply faulty logic.
I would point out that biological weapons have been a thing since about 1500 BC, and would have been known to the founders, yet they didn’t see fit to prohibit them. In fact, the British used biological weapons against the colonies as far back as 1763. They didn’t know how the weapons worked or anything at all about germs, but they knew giving blankets that had been used by smallpox victims to people would cause the recipients to get smallpox.
If only the founders had seen a way for the Constitution to be modified as technology changed. I mean, there is the part in there about amending it. I’m sure the issue here is that you couldn’t get the requisite 2/3 vote of Congress and 3/4 of the states to sign on, especially if Trump were the one pushing for it. After all, the left hates Trump so much that even a proposal to restrict the protection of the Second Amendment to not include nukes would fail to clear the bar for Congress.
That’s the proper way to amend our supreme laws, not by simply declaring that it means something else because we don’t happen to like the result or implications.
These kids today are bitching because they claim we of the older generations had it easy. They claim since rent is $2800/month, things are harder now than they were.
Just because you thunk you struggled (you really didnt) doesnt mean you shoikd expect future generstions to do the same
When I first got out of the military I moved to Arkansas. My entire family wound up living in the storeroom of the business I was trying to start. My kids were bathing in a 4 quart ice chest. It sucked. The only job I could find was working for a plant that made aluminum BBQ bits. Not as a maintenance worker or as an electrician, but filing the burrs off of metal castings for $5 per hour.
I decided we couldn’t make a living there, so we moved to Florida. When I got here, the only job I could get was as an electrician for $7.25 an hour. I was working for a company called Palmer electric, and two of us would be tasked with wiring a house (rough in) each day. That’s a lot of work for two people. The company charged the contractor $400 for the job. There was no real profit to be made. That’s why they started using illegals- the companies who were doing that could charge even less and still make money. This was 30+ years ago.
I was making $1000 per month and using that to support a family of four. The rent on our two bedroom apartment was $550 a month. That left us $450 per month for food, utilities, clothes, all of the other expenses. WalMart sold hotdogs $1 per pack, and Mac&Cheese $4 for 4 boxes. Slice 2 hot dogs up and mix with the pasta, and you have 4 dinners for $5. WalMart sold blue jeans for $8. I washed them in Borax to get the oil stains out. That’s how we made the money last.
I managed to get a job as an electrician at the airport, repairing boarding bridges, conveyor belts, and car washes. The pay was better- I was getting $9 an hour. We still struggled, so I got a second job as a part time firefighter.
This extreme poverty was what led me to asking my wife to get a job while the kids were in school. I just couldn’t take being poor and working two jobs while she sat home all day and the kids were in school. She refused, telling me that she married me so she wouldn’t have to work, and we wound up separating. Less than three months after that, I was homeless.
That’s not struggling, according to them. This generation thinks that no one else can possibly know what it’s like to struggle, as they complain about high rent. I can find a dozen apartments for less than $2k. Looking in my old neighborhood, I see a 2BR going for $1600. When you take into account the difference in pay from then, and housing is about the same cost as it was 30 years ago.
The poverty level for a family of 4 was $15,600 per year when all of that happened. I made $15,100 that year with a wife and two kids. The poverty level today for a single person is $15,300 per year and $32,150 for a family of 4. The difference is that Florida’s minimum wage is now $31,200. In other words, it’s EXACTLY the same as it was then. Nothing ever changes.
These people bitch over and over again about how they are poor. Then people who used to be poor come forward and give them perfectly reasonable advice on how to change. Instead of accepting that, they say “things are totally different now, you had it easy” then go back to bitching about how they are poor and it’s all Elon and “capitalism” that has caused it.
They attacked a lifeguard by throwing shoes at them in full view of a cop. “We dindu nuthin”
Refuse to ID. “We dindu nuthin”
Kicked and spit on a cop. “We dindu nuthin”
I’m just over it.
All of this started because the black man exposed himself to a lifeguard and then refused to leave when told to do so by lifeguards. Then, when told to stay away from the woman he was showing his dick to, he tried to approach and talk to her about it, even though she was trying to hide from him.
Of course, they all whip out the race card and claim they are only being treated like this because they are black. Then told the black officer that he shouldn’t be taking the side of white cops, but should be on their side because they are black.
