Silence the opposition

Not 2 million

Harris claims that she is going to use executive orders to institute an import ban on “assault weapons” and have a mandatory “buyback” of the 2 million “assault weapons” that are in the US. Here she is in 2019, outlining her plan:

She is a lying stupid wannabe dictator. First off, there are about 50 million AR15s in this country. She also says that she is going to do it without Congress.

These people in Washington, DC have failed to have the courage. How many of you guys as college students had to have a drill during high school, or middle school, or elementary school, or even in college, where you learned that you had to hide in a closet…When elected, of Congress fails to act- I’ll give them 100 days to put a bill on my desk for signature- and of they do not do it, I will put in place by executive action a comprehensive background check requirement, and a ban on assault weapons, on the importation of assault weapons into our country. I’m done. [applause]

No. How about go fuck yourself. Soon, it will be time to stop talking. There will be no point in having a discussion with people who do not respect the Constitution, the rule of law, or the limits on the power of the executive. Soon, it will be time to shut down the blog.

Four years ago, I predicted that Trump would never again see the inside of the Whitehouse. Many people said that I was wrong. I also declared that we were seeing a communist takeover of our nation. I was laughed at and told that I was ridiculous. (The blogger who said that is still blogging, but that blog now reads like a lonely cat lady blog.) That last bit of information made me remember this clip.

Still, it’s going to get uglier that we can possibly imagine.

By Divemedic, ago

Rigging the Election, Sowing Confusion

Long time readers know that I have been saying for more than three years that the left would kill Donald Trump before letting him retake the Oval office. Even Tucker Carlson said the same last August and was lambasted for it, I believed the term used was “bonkers.”

At the risk of sounding like a conspiracy theorist, what happened yesterday was genius. The pictures of the shooter, wearing a t-shirt from a progun Youtube channel, then news that he was a Republican are simply genius. Had a purple-haired tranny been the shooter, the civil war would have begun almost immediately.

Instead, what we now see is a fig leaf that will keep many on the fence and allow both sides of the aisle to pander for gun control, thus creating enough of a smoke screen to permit an organized PR campaign calling people who disagree “conspiracy theorists.” He is supposedly a registered Republican, yet was donating money to leftist causes?

A voter-registration record showed that Mr. Crooks was registered as a Republican, though federal campaign-finance records show he donated $15 to the Progressive Turnout Project, a liberal voter turnout group, through the Democratic donation platform ActBlue in January 2021.

I don’t believe it.

I have worked with the Secret Service (not as an employee- they enlist local government for assistance) during three different Presidencies, and they are pretty good at what they do. They don’t let anyone get that close to their protectees. So how, I am asking, did a man armed with a rifle get within 150 yards of a secret service principal and no one noticed? Then there is this story with video of how they were warned about the armed man, and did nothing.

I don’t believe that story.

This was the swamp, trying to take Trump out. They are scared, they are willing to kill him, and by extension, they are willing to kill you. We have reached the point where people are voting from the rooftops, but the only people voting appear to me to be intelligence agency operatives.

By Divemedic, ago

The True Objective

Of course, we all know that the prosecution of Trump is being carried out to interfere with his election chances. If there were any doubt, the fact that the prosecutors in the documents case have asked for a gag order because his statements “endanger law enforcement agents.”

The goal here is to shut him up. I contend that the NY case will see him go to jail, and he will die there. They are going to do whatever it takes to prevent him from seeing the inside of the Oval Office again, and have been doing so since he denied Hillary her turn at the White House. I have been saying this for over three years.

By Divemedic, ago

Talking Points

Donald Trump is under a court order that prohibits him from speaking about, well, pretty much anything. The stated reason for this order is to prevent Trump from exercising undue influence on the outcome of the trial. The witnesses in the Trump case, the judge’s wife, and the prosecutor are not under similar restrictions. The reason for this is simple- the court is trying to railroad Donald Trump.

The left has all of its minions singing in unison that Trump’s free speech rights aren’t being infringed upon because he still has the ability to speak under oath from the witness stand. That’s ridiculous. No one has to give up their Fifth Amendment rights in order to exercise their First Amendment rights.

The left claims that, since Trump is on trial, the only place that he should be permitted to speak is on the witness stand as a witness against himself. As I have been saying, this is a show trial that is designed to destroy Joe Biden’s opponent, and ensure that Biden serves another term. If this were happening in any other nation, the US would be screaming to all who would listen that the elections were being tampered with.

Trump should continue violating the gag order. Dare the court to toss you in jail on contempt charges, then have your PR apparatus scream on every single media outlet about Joe Biden jailing his political opponent. It will raise Trump’s popularity numbers and destroy Joe Biden’s.

The response from Washington would probably also be the spark that begins CW2.

Go ahead, make DJT into a martyr. I dare you.

By Divemedic, ago

Making an Example

A Florida woman was sentenced in Manhattan federal court by Judge Laura Taylor Swain, who called the Palm Beach, Florida, woman’s actions “despicable.” What I want to know is how a Manhattan court, which seems to be doing all of the President’s dirty work nowadays, has jurisdiction over a crime which is alleged to have occurred in Florida. There are actual Federal courts in Florida, so there was no need to have the trial in New York, but if you are a liberal, you know that the best place to have a Kangaroo Court that will find someone on the right guilty of being an enemy of the state is New York.

Whether or not you want to get engaged in a legal argument over how someone can steal something that a person left behind, there are a few questions that no one in the MSM is asking. One of them concerns this quote:

With a lawyer for Ashley Biden observing from the courtroom’s spectator section, Harris apologized to the president’s daughter, saying she regrets making her childhood and life public.

Yes, with this trial, the Federal government is officially acknowledging that the document is the actual diary of Ashley Biden. So with that being said, can we now also begin looking into whether or not the diary entries about Biden showering with his then teenaged daughter are accurate? Then there is the money quote:

“Ms. Harris is not the victim in this case,” Sobelman said. “Ms. Biden is the victim in this case.”

That’s correct. But what crime is she a victim of? I would say that the crime of having her diary sold is far less traumatic than being the victim of a pedophilic, child molesting father. Can we now investigate that? I thought that no one was above the law?

No matter what, it was important that an example be made of Harris. She unmasked a Democrat for being the pedo that he is. That can’t be allowed to stand.

They are coming for everyone who dares to oppose them.

By Divemedic, ago

It Has Nothing to do with TikTok

I see so many people online who are cheering on the bill that is being advertised as shutting down TikTok. If you are one of them, then you aren’t looking at the reality of what is happening. The bill is called the “Protecting Americans From Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act.” The name, as is usual of government sponsored laws, is misleading. Go on, read it yourself. Of course, I read it.

There is a reason why the establishment of both parties is endorsing it, and it has nothing to do with getting those kids to stop doing those annoying dances everywhere. Let’s start with who is covered by the law:

The term “covered company” means an entity that operates, directly or indirectly (including through a parent company, subsidiary, or affiliate), a website, desktop application, mobile application, or augmented or immersive technology application that—

(i) permits a user to create an account or profile to generate, share, and view text, images, videos, real-time communications, or similar content;

(ii) has more than 1,000,000 monthly active users with respect to at least 2 of the 3 months preceding the date on which a relevant determination of the President is made pursuant to paragraph (3)(B);

(iii) enables 1 or more users to generate or distribute content that can be viewed by other users of the website, desktop application, mobile application, or augmented or immersive technology application; and

(iv) enables 1 or more users to view content generated by other users of the website, desktop application, mobile application, or augmented or immersive technology application.

OK. So what can’t a covered company do?

It shall be unlawful for an entity to distribute, maintain, or update … a foreign adversary controlled application by carrying out … any of the following:

(A) Providing services to distribute, maintain, or update such foreign adversary controlled application (including any source code of such application) by means of a marketplace (including an online mobile application store) through which users within the land or maritime borders of the United States may access, maintain, or update such application.

(B) Providing internet hosting services to enable the distribution, maintenance, or updating of such foreign adversary controlled application for users within the land or maritime borders of the United States.

emphasis added

OK. So what does the law say is a prohibited foreign adversary controlled application? A application that is owned or operated by a foreign adversary. So what is a foreign adversary? It does name TikTok by name, but then goes on to say it is basically anything that the President says that it is:

a covered company that—

(i) is controlled by a foreign adversary; and

(ii) that is determined by the President to present a significant threat to the national security of the United States following the issuance of—

(I) a public notice proposing such determination; and

(II) a public report to Congress, submitted not less than 30 days before such determination, describing the specific national security concern involved and containing a classified annex and a description of what assets would need to be divested to execute a qualified divestiture.

Then the law goes on to say that if you want to challenge this law, you have to do it under the DC circuit or the DC court of appeals, and you have to do it within 165 days of it passing.

This law is squarely aimed at shutting down Twitter, or at least taking its ownership away from Elon Musk. Since Twitter (X) is the only social media platform that isn’t taking its marching orders from the FBI. We are on the cusp of seeing our media and information channels being 100% under the control of the President.

By Divemedic, ago