No Evidence of Voter Fraud

She is admitting that there were at least 6600 illegal immigrants who were registered to vote in her state. They are blaming “a software error” from before she was governor that allowed this to happen. So we have arrived at the “that’s not my fault” stage.

EDITED TO ADD:

This gets more interesting. The company that provides NJ’s ID software says the registrations were not due to software error, but were forwarded to them from NJ’s division of elections.

Won, but Useless

I have to say that I agree with what I recently heard a politician say. I wish I could remember who said it or find the video. What he said was essentially “the Republicans need to stop worrying about election fraud. No matter the fraud or absence of fraud, the Republicans won the last election. They now run the House, the Senate, the Presidency, AND the Supreme Court. What have they done with all of that power? Not much. Not nearly enough.”

To an extent, he is correct. I mean, Trump started a war in Iran with no clear objective and no end in sight. The Iranians are looking to keep the war going until at least November, so they can be the spoiler in that election. The Republicans managed to get rid of Roe, and are making serious inroads into getting rid of many gun control laws, but that is a function of SCOTUS and is fallout from the 2016 election. The result of the most recent 2024 election is somewhere between Jack and Shit, which is what the Republicans have managed to do so far.

If there aren’t some serious changes in the next couple of years, I think I am going to sit out most of the next election. I will vote in local and some state races, but I don’t think I can hold my nose and vote for the stupid do-nothing party. I can’t vote for a communist, Democrat, but that doesn’t mean I have to vote for a Republican who isn’t going to do anything but line his own pockets, either.

Why is it that the left can make so much progress on their agenda when they are in power, but the Republicans can’t seem to do anything? It’s almost like their stated agenda is just something they say so they can gain power, but we all know that would never be true. /sarc

Scary, Indeed

Going back to the DSA manifesto I posted about the other day: I want to talk about the changes to our Constitution that the Democrat party wants to enact. I don’t want to talk about the socialist “give me free shit” they always use to entice the useful idiots, because that’s the same old stuff they have been pushing for a decade. No, its their desired changes to our government that scare me. All quotes taken directly from the new DSA website.

  • Replace the President and Supreme Court with an executive and judiciary chosen by and subordinate to Congress.

This is the scariest of the proposals. Making the supreme court and the executive subordinate to Congress would require that we either rewrite or completely ignore the Constitution. We would go from three co-equal branches of government to a politburo that can literally do whatever it wants. There are absolutely no checks or balances to this system.

  • Replace the two-party system with a multi-party democracy.
  • Expand the House of Representatives, implement proportional representation and ranked choice voting in all elections, and abolish the Senate.

Expanding the House and eliminating the Senate was already partially done when we switched to the direct election of Senators, but doing it the way that the DSA wants to do it would take us from a bicameral legislature.

The framers of the Constitution designed a bicameral system during the 1787 Constitutional Convention to achieve three primary goals:

  • Checks and Balances: Dividing legislative power to ensure that no single house can dominate the government. All bills must be passed by both chambers in identical form before becoming law.
  • Fair Representation: The system, born out of the Connecticut Compromise, balances the interests of highly populated states (represented proportionally in the House) with smaller states (given equal representation in the Senate). This is also why they want to get rid of the electoral college.
  • Deliberation: The requirement of a “concurrent majority” promotes thorough debate and prevents hasty, emotionally driven legislation.

The next thing they want is: Establish public ownership of the largest corporations and essential industries to ensure democratic control and accountability to the people. What they mean is that their new expanded House will have control.

Of course, they can’t simply hand that much power over to a potential Trump, so they need to make sure this absolute power lies only in their hands. To that end, they are going to:

  • Legalize migration,
  • grant amnesty for all immigrants regardless of status,
  • provide a path to citizenship for all permanent residents,
  • end visa caps and quotas.
  • Extend full voting rights to all permanent U.S. residents
  • restore the right to vote for incarcerated people and people with criminal convictions. 

This is full on communism. There is no other way to put it. It’s coming, and I have been warning of this since 2020. I have already heard people telling me “that will never happen. They will never get the votes.”

The fact is, most people vote party, or likeability, race, or some other factor. Most voters don’t understand or keep up with the issues. They want sound bites, and the Democrat party is promising them free shit. That’s why the socialists are slowing taking over the Democratic party, which is moving more and more to the left with every passing day. Hundreds of socialists are in political office all over the nation. They are making far more inroads to power than are the Libertarians. Even St Petersburg, Florida has a socialist in office, and more coming, as they run as Democrats.

In all, 28 socialist candidates have won Democratic primaries this cycle. NYC has an openly communist mayor, and is about to get two communist congressional representatives. Wisconsin is likely to get a communist governor this election cycle. The entire country is shifting to communism.

There are two outcomes, well, three:

  • Civil War
  • Communist dictatorship
  • Both

Make fun of me, refuse to believe me, whatever. It’s coming.

Majority

with the death of Lindsey Graham and what appears to be the death of Mitch McConnell, the Republican Old Guard’s grip on the Senate just took an interesting turn.

Both of them were Republicans, but also were anti-Trumpers.

Interesting developments, for sure. Now I will wait for the inevitable responses of Israel did it in 3,2,1…

Terrorism

Antifa will break out your windows and bear mace you and your family while you are sleeping. That’s why I’ve been telling people to get out of certain areas.

This is also why the left so badly wants gun control.

Anchors

China doesn’t need to invade. They almost own us already. The Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas Islands has a population of about 50,000 people, but 1.5 million US citizens have been born there to Chinese mothers since 2009.

This is how it works. China now has 1.5 million US birth certificates, with the oldest of them turning 18 years old next year. Those birth certificates can now be used to register to vote in any state that allows registration online or by mail. They can also request mail in ballots, with some states sending them ballots without a request.

Now the Chinese government has millions of votes in US elections. They don’t need to invade, because they can use Chinese vaginas as vote factories.

Billions

The democratic protests are all being funded– with the protests in Newark taking in over $800 million a year. That’s just one set of protests in one city. Multiply those amounts times the number of cities where it’s happening, and you can see that we are looking at billions. More than a couple of billion. Every election year. That’s how we always get unrest every election year.

Now think about that for a moment. How much is money has been spent on these “protests” in the past six years? $20 billion? 40? More? That isn’t grassroots. It isn’t the Democrats- they raise less than $200 million most years, and couldn’t afford the billions that is being spent here. They couldn’t afford to fund the protests in Newark, let alone an entire nationwide movement. That isn’t even large private donors. There is only one class of donor that can sustain that level of funding.

A government. A large government.

In my opinion? Our own government.

Even as far back as 2017, I noted the CIA appeared to be pulling things off like the Las Vegas shooting. I mean, who else has the juice to swap tail numbers on aircraft?

The entire 2020 George Floyd protest playbook was nearly identical to the CIA insurgency manual. I wrote about that extensively during the 2020-2022 timeframe.

The US government is one of the few who could fund and organize this sort of operation. The list is short because a general campaign to do this is expensive, labor intensive, and has little benefit for the cost.

Unless you are trying to destabilize the US. Think about that, and what the implications of that are. It will keep you up at night.

Firing the Coup Leaders

There was a lot of angst coming from the left about The Secretary of War firing the Army Chief of Staff. The left is screaming about it. Why is that?

Don’t forget that James O’Keefe exposed a plan by US military Generals who were planning on refusing orders from President Trump and overthrowing the government. I believe we are still seeing the fallout from that.

James O’Keefe released a report just before the inauguration, where a former FBI agent was bragging to an undercover reporter about how he had been in the Tank (that is the Pentagon underground command post) meeting with a number of senior military Generals, and they were planning to resist the legitimate orders of the President upon his inauguration. This wasn’t a one time conversation- this FBI agent was a senior advisor to the Pentagon, and also a key player in the efforts to torpedo Trump’s 2016 campaign for the Clinton campaign.

During these meetings, according to the interview, high-level Pentagon officials were discussing in secret meetings defying and potentially overthrowing Trump if he issued orders deemed controversial by military leadership. If that sentence doesn’t send a shiver down your spine, you don’t understand the US military.

I believe that Biden knew about all of this, which is why Milley got a Presidential pardon. After all, we already knew that Milley had staged a coup back in 2021.

They are lucky they aren’t getting the death penalty under Article 94. You can read my post on that from a year ago.

Violence

The left is turning up the heat because it’s an election year, because of course they are.

This is what they are using to justify committing violent acts. They want you to submit or die.

That’s Some Soviet Shit

Remember when the left got their panties in a bunch when Florida prohibited teaching about gay sex? Papers were written, and the left’s chorus were all claiming it was a First Amendment violation. (pdf warning- not hosted here)

Proving once again that, if it weren’t for double standards, the left would have no standards at all, Virginia has passed a law that defies belief. It is now a crime in Virginia for a school to “state, suggest, or present as credible a statement or suggestion that there was extensive election fraud that could have changed or actually changed the results of the 2020 presidential election.” 

Not only that, but the same law says that school instruction must “Describe the January 6, 2021, insurrection at the United States Capitol as an unprecedented, violent attack on United States democratic institutions, infrastructure, and representatives for the purpose of overturning the results of the 2020 presidential election.”

Not only is this law egregious, but CBS’ reporting of it is as bad. The reporting here would have made Goebbels or Zhdanov proud. First lie is in the headline:

Virginia passes legislation prohibiting schools from teaching falsehoods about Jan. 6 riot

Read the money quote:

The White House posted a series of lies about Jan. 6 on an official federal government web page on Jan. 6, 2026, including a bogus claim that police bore responsibility for the attack.

So is telling teachers to teach only one side of a story propaganda, or not? A First Amendment issue, or not? Wouldn’t it be better in a politically charged case like this one, to present both sides and let students decide for themselves? Are we teaching students how to think, or what to think?

  • “Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.”
  • “The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
  • “All propaganda is lies, even when one is telling the truth. I don’t think this matters so long as one knows what one is doing, and why.”