Now that it’s known the lone juror with the large testicles on the Clancy jury was a black man, the left will quietly drop the entire narrative of attacking him rather quickly. This will disappear from the news cycle and from social media by Monday morning.
The defense attorney has filed a motion for a forced “not guilty” verdict because he claims the jury got it wrong.
This post is late because it’s concerning the Lindsay Clancy trial. I wrote and scheduled it before the mistrial was declared. I decided to postpone it so I could do some edits. This is the result.
The Lindsay Clancy case has brought the TikTok Detective bureau out of the shadows. These women, experts in everything from police procedure to medicine, psychology, forensic evidence collection, law, military tactics, and nuclear physics are on the case and have declared Lindsay to be not guilty for reasons ranging from insanity to “her husband did it.”
Of course claims she didn’t do it at all for some reason, including claims that it was her husband are demonstrably false. As evidence, we can take the word of her attorney. No, not the attorney in the current criminal trial, but her attorney from January, where she was the plaintiff in a lawsuit against her doctor. I’m posting a pdf of the notes from the case and the actual complaint filed with the Norfolk, Mass. court (pdf warning).
In that lawsuit, she made the following claim:
and this one, also from her lawsuit:
Keep in mind, she was indicted for killing those children in October 2023, yet waited to file this lawsuit until January of 2026, shortly before her criminal trial. This is part of a claim Lindsay and her attorneys are making, that she was not in control or aware of her actions at the time she killed the children.
For that reason, there is no doubt, zero, that she in fact killed those children.
Killing someone isn’t always illegal, but in those cases, the defense requires admitting to the facts. For example, if I shoot and kill someone who tried to rob me at gunpoint, claiming self defense requires that I admit to shooting and killing the person, but I have an affirmative defense in that self defense is legal. I make the claim of being in reasonable fear for my life. The prosecution then has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the shooting wasn’t in self defense.
The actual controlling Massachusetts rule is the doctrine of criminal responsibility, originating in Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court case law rather than a statute specifically saying “psychosis.” The foundational case is Commonwealth v. McHoul, 352 Mass. 544, 546–547 (1967). The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s current 2026 Model Jury Instruction on Criminal Responsibility states:
A person is not criminally responsible for his conduct if he has a mental disease or defect, and, as a result of that mental disease or defect, lacks the substantial capacity either to appreciate the criminality or wrongfulness of his conduct or to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law.
The evidence never required anyone to believe Lindsay Clancy was well. She clearly was not, as anyone who will kill their children is not mentally well. But being profoundly mentally ill and not being responsible for your actions are not the same thing. The law in this case requires the person making the insanity claim be unaware of the wrongfulness of their actions.
None of the providers who treated Lindsay Clancy diagnosed her with postpartum depression or psychosis. The evidence instead pointed toward a serious mood disorder, with multiple of them diagnosong her as bipolar.
As many who are bipolar do, she resisted that diagnosis, changed providers, often skipping or refusing to take medications. Lindsay was prescribed 13 different psychiatric medications over several months. That does NOT mean she was taking 13 medications simultaneously. The prosecution’s evidence indicated roughly 2–3 at a time. Then there’s the actual pill inventory presented at trial:
She hid some of her most disturbing thoughts from the people treating her because she knew it would result in her kids being taken. Above all, people with this condition are well known for resisting treatment, because they “aren’t crazy.”
Lindsay claims through her attorney that she became convinced that her brain was damaged and she would never return to her old self. She was suicidal, but her children were a tether to life, according to her claims.
Then there is the alleged voice. After months of treatment without documented psychosis, Lindsay said she heard a voice telling her to kill the children in the days and minutes before the killings. We are talking about roughly an 18-minute window where a voice commanded she kill her children. She never spoke of this voice before, or mentioned it until after the killings.
Yet during the killings and the hours preceding them, she was capable of purposeful, sequential behavior.
She created the opportunity to be alone with the children. She researched how long her husband’s trip would take and added another errand to extend that time. She killed the children one by one over a 15 minute period. When her husband called during this time, she missed his call and then made the decision to call him back. In the middle of a psychotic break so profound that it compelled her to kill her three children without realizing the gravity of her actions, she still recognized her husband had called, understood that not responding could warrant him returning early, and took affirmative action to call him back. That is difficult to reconcile with the narrative that Lindsay suddenly “snapped” and had no awareness of what she was doing.
Lindsay was profoundly mentally ill and genuinely wanted to die. But she still understood what she was doing when she killed her children. Those things are not mutually exclusive. She took steps to hide her psychosis, this alleged voice compelling her to kill, to get her husband out of the house, and to one by one kill her children.
Mental illness deserves compassion, and postpartum mental health deserves treatment, attention, and resources. However, compassion can’t replace the legal standard for criminal responsibility.
If the standard becomes, “She was a loving mother, therefore she must have snapped,” we’re no longer applying the law to the evidence. We’re creating our own definition of justice based on emotion and feelings.
In my opinion, this woman knew exactly what she was doing. She took steps to hide her behavior while she was carrying out her plan. All of this suggests cunning and a sense of guilt. You don’t hide your actions if you are unaware of the wrongness of what you are doing. In Massachusetts, the legal term for this is “consciousness of guilt.”
The legal issue to which those facts are relevant is whether the Commonwealth proved that the defendant retained substantial capacity to “appreciate the criminality or wrongfulness” of the conduct and to conform conduct to law. Massachusetts defines “appreciate” as understand, “criminality” as the legal significance of the conduct, and “wrongfulness” as its moral significance.
In this case, taking steps to prevent her plan from being foiled:
In my mind, that is what it boils down to: Did this woman know what she was doing was wrong, as evidenced by the fact that she took active, complex actions to ensure no one could discover or prevent her from carrying out her plan.
I think the answer is that she knew full well what she was doing. I tip my hat to the one juror who had the cajones to stand his ground in the face of the other 11 members of the jury, the judge, and the defense attorney. He stood up for those children, despite surely knowing what would happen to him in the aftermath, once his identity is discovered. The left is going to make his life miserable.
Now there are actually dumbasses out there who are calling for the elimination of the jury trial, saying we should use professional tribunals instead.
Read this article about a Charlie Kirk sign being vandalized in Loganville, Ga. back in September of 2025. In case you are wondering, SYBAU means “Shut Your Bitch Ass Up.” Now watch the following two videos.
If you look in the comments to the video, some are claiming vandalism is free speech. So if I begin holding down leftists and tattooing swastikas on their foreheads, would THAT be free speech as well? No? What’s the difference? Would it be OK if instead of your forehead, I simply painted it on your house or keyed it into your car? Why?
It doesn’t matter, because they caught the fat ugly Antifa bitch.
Here is a video of the arrest:
Unsurprisingly, she looks like a frumpy 2. They all look similar. I tried to find the outcome or status of the case, but perhaps her charges were dropped, because no case was found under her name in the Walton county court records system.
You read that right- the Seventh Circuit (Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin) court of appeals has just ruled the First Amendment protects an individual’s right to possess images or videos of child sexual abuse created using artificial intelligence, if the material does not depict a real person and remains in the home.
Stop me if you’ve heard this one. ICE agents arrested a New Orleans police recruit back in January. He was set to graduate and become a police officer. He had already been issued a gun despite the fact that he could not legally carry a weapon as an illegal alien under Federal law. Larry Temah originally entered the United States legally in 2015 on a visitor visa from Cameroon.
In 2016, he was granted conditional residency after marrying a U.S. citizen. However, in 2022, his application for permanent residency was denied due to fraud. Temah was ordered to appear in immigration court three times but continued to disregard U.S. law by not showing up, resulting in the immigration judge ordering him removed in absentia. He did not have valid work authorization.
It’s a felony for a person who is an illegal alien to possess a firearm or ammunition. Think about that- the cop who is arresting you may just in fact be a felon.
It should come as no surprise- the police chief of New Orleans is a DEI hire herself- she was the police chief of Oakland until 2020, when she got fired. She ran over two people with her car back in 2024. Did I mention she gets paid $340k a year?
This opens a bigger can of worms: When an illegal immigrant cop comes to confiscate your guns and arrest you while themselves committing the felony of unlawful firearms possession, is it legal to resist with force? What about their fellow cops? How many of THEM will side with their illegal immigrant police brethren? Isn’t that an accessory?
Sworn to uphold the law, my ass. However, I am betting when shit does go sideways, these illegal immigrant cops will be loyal to whoever is writing their paychecks.
In a suburb of Chicago, groups of “Teens” display firearms and cash.
I wonder if all of them have an Illinois FOID. The local police have this to say.
The money quote?
While this video is disturbing, there does not appear to be any direct threat to the general public.
I’m guessing the claim here is these “teens” are using these guns for deer hunting and not for criminal gang activity.
EDITED TO ADD:
Law abiding people in these same states freaking out over every sight, mod, stock, or grip because any one of them might turn the **exact** same gun into 5 years in federal prison on 1st offense, with the cops coming over to shoot their kids and pets when they storm the house to arrest them over a barrel that is a quarter inch too short, but these “teens” can literally walk around like this, knowing police do not care in the slightest and won’t do a thing to find or prosecute them. The criminal gang members know those laws exist, they simply do not care because there are no consequences.
Brought to you by the same people who keep your cash if they find it in your car during a traffic stop:
Police request public’s help to find suspect who picked up $30 off ground in Walmart
Since they couldn’t solve the case of the murder of 9 year old Nigel Brown and the charges against his killer, Gerdnardric Pittman, were dropped by the District Attorney’s office, I would have taken my chances. This would never have gone to court.
Black men who murder 9 year old white kids walk free, but an old white man who finds 30 bucks on the ground are the subject of nationwide manhunts.
About 20 years ago, I responded as a paramedic to a 911 call. A man had called the emergency number because his wife had called to tell him she was going to kill herself and the kids. We responded and the entry team went into the house. Inside, it was discovered to be too late. The woman and all four kids were dead.
In January of 2023, in Duxbury, Massachusetts, Lindsay Clancy sent her husband out for takeout and medicine, and while he was gone, she strangled her three young children (Cora (5), Dawson (3), and Callan (8 months)) using exercise bands. She then called her husband to tell him he should come home right away, and as he arrived at the house, she jumped from a second-story window in an attempted suicide that left her paralyzed.
In Jacksonville, Florida police arrested a couple who had refused to let the woman’s children leave the cab of the truck for years. Investigators say the four children had been living in the cab of a semitruck driven by the woman’s boyfriend (who is a truck driver for a company operating between Atlanta, Georgia, and Miami, Florida) since December 2019. The children had been locked in the cab of the truck for so long, they could no longer walk. The man had been sexually abusing the children. The children told investigators that the mother was informed of the abuse but did not believe them and continued to leave them alone with him.
I wanted to post on this because it brought back a flood of memories for me. I don’t mention this often, because I don’t want sympathy. In fact, I’ve only mentioned this on my blog one other time. When I was a child, my mother used to burn my fingers with matches when my brother or I touched something that we weren’t supposed to. When we said something objectional, she would put hot peppers in our mouths. She used to tell me things like “I have to love you because I am your mother, but I don’t have to like you.” Later as an adult, I was homeless for a time. That’s when I called my parents for help, because even though we hadn’t been speaking for a couple of years, I had nowhere else to turn. They hung up on me. There were plenty of reasons for me to resent her. All of those reasons are probably why I have had so many failed relationships. It made me into a person that isn’t good at being vulnerable or sharing my feelings. It’s also probably why I am such an overachiever and why I try to be the righter of wrongs, even if it means tilting at windmills.
The relationship between a mother who abuses her children and the children she is abusing is a complex one from the viewpoint of the child. Children are born with an impression of their mother. She is supposed to be the one person they can count on and depend on. They are the one person that’s supposed to be the child’s safety, their protector. When that person becomes the one causing the child’s pain, it destroys their world, while even at the same time the child is drawn to that same person for love and safety.
So to the people who say the mothers above are sick or should have some sort of mercy given to them because of post partum depression, I have to tell you that there is true evil in this world. I was once one of the victims of that sort of abuse. I’ve also had to be there to see where that abuse often ends. It’s always a tragedy. When I see stories like this, I imagine the child standing there crying to its mother for protection as they watch her strangle their siblings to death, knowing and fearing that they are next, and wondering what they did wrong to deserve this. It’s overwhelming.
My son had a best friend growing up, let’s call him Brad. I knew the kid. The group of friends that my son was a part of and who grew up together eventually married and had kids. Brad was always there for them, good old friend Uncle Ben was being a good friend and watching the kids for them. It turns out he was molesting them and filming it. When he was eventually caught, my son agreed to testify against him. Instead of facing a Federal trial for distributing child porn and the 30 years he could have gotten if convicted, Brad pled guilty. His lawyer argued to the judge that he be given leniency, since he had confessed. The judge agreed and knocked six months off of sentence he could have given him. The kid is doing 29.5 years in Federal prison.
In a moment of complete honesty to my readers: Truly evil acts like this are what completely destroyed any positive religion in my very core. I just can’t understand how any god that can allow things like this to be done to children cannot be loving or good. I just can’t understand any being having the power to stop such evil, yet allowing it to happen. Please don’t think of this as an attack on your or your beliefs, this is just a statement of why I feel the way I do. I have seen far too much evil, suffering, and pain to understand how there can possibly be a good and loving deity running things.
For those of you who *ARE* religious, please explain to me how these two things can simultaneously be true-
I struggle with this each and every time I see something like this with my own eyes. It hurts me to my core each and every time I see it or hear about it. Maybe that’s a me problem, I don’t know. All I do know is seeing things like this made me a bitter, withdrawn human for awhile. When people would tell me “I know how you must feel,” my answer used to be, “Have you ever held a dead baby? No? Ever seen a mother stab her child to death? No? Then you can’t possibly know how I feel.” Such things are an assault on a person’s very core. It changes you forever.
The best answer I have ever been able to come up with is this: Some people are just evil or broken. You can’t reason with them, you can’t fix them, you can’t predict which of them will be like this. You have to wait for them to commit one of these heinous acts in order to identify them. Once you know who they are, there is only one true way to make sure they never do it again.
Even though I don’t trust the government with that power, I still think it’s the only way to prevent a person from committing evil again.
I know I said no post today, but this begs for a comment. Watch this and take what lesson you can from it.
Racial tensions are as high as I can recall. This is an attack by a man upon two unsuspecting women, and purely based on race.
It’s also why I carry. Note this happened in Charlotte, NC, where they can legally carry guns. Why didn’t someone punch that asshole’s ticket? This is the 23rd time he’s been arrested in the past 14 years.
Hunt was in 2020 convicted of shooting into a building or a vehicle with a person inside, Charlotte-Observer news partner WSOC first reported. He has been arrested on charges of assault against women and government officials, trespassing and violating probation and domestic violence orders eight times in the last three years, jail records show.
How many times before he actually gets caged or shot? Are the residents of Charlotte waiting for him to kill someone?
Avoid feral negros. Cross the street. Go a different way. Be prepared to kill them, because they will certainly kill you.