Good Guys with Guns

A study of records shows that CCW holders stopped 180 of 515 active shootings in the decade that ended in 2023. When the study excluded gunfree zones, it turns out that there were 350 active shooters, and private citizens stopped more than half of all active shootings, did so with fewer lost lives, and fewer bystanders hit.

In fact, in those 180 shootings, only one innocent was hit by the CCW holder, only two of the CCW holders was killed, and none of them were of any hinderance to law enforcement. In 44 of those shootings, the CCW holder was injured.

Compare that to the police. In the 156 active shooters stopped by law enforcement, police accidentally shot the wrong person 4 times, killing fellow officers twice and private citizens twice. That’s more than double the rate of private citizens accidentally shooting a bystander.

During the events, 27 police were shot and killed while trying to stop an active shooter, a 7.7 percent rate, which is nearly six times higher than the rate for private CCW holders.

Incompetent

A man is involved in an incident that involves a police officer being shot and another man killed. The court rules that he is incompetent to stand trial, so they let him go. Nine years later, he stabs two police canines before being shot and killed by police.

I understand why you would rule that someone is incompetent to stand trial. What I don’t understand is why that means the crazy person is free to go out and kill again. A video review of the man’s shooting is here:

Busted

I have the rest of the story of the armed feral negro queens Amish Canadians who were trespassing on the property of and kicking the dog of their neighbor. The story is out of Pittsburg, California and the two Canadians involved are a mother, Lagashia Williams, and her daughter, Graciela Amar, both from Oakland.

It turns out that they had parked a car on top of some of the landscaping, to which the homeowner and neighbor, Albert Lopes, too exception. He said something to the pair and the daughter responded by retrieving a firearm from the car. During the argument, the mother told the daughter to kick the dog and the complied. The dog was kicked so hard, it flew through the air, receiving liver and leg damage, as well as a ruptured spinal disk. The man setup a GoFundMe that has raised $18,000 to cover the dog’s medical expenses.

This shit really pisses me off. People should be able to enjoy their property, and that includes letting your useless little ankle biting dog run free upon it. At no point should you have to worry about bands of armed marauding negros tread upon it while threatening you with violence. In a just world, you would be permitted to shoot them and mount their heads upon pikes as a warning to the others.

Bayside Shooting

A pair of cops in Virginia Beach were shot and killed this weekend. The area of town in which they were killed is just a couple of miles where I was involved in an incident between myself, a couple of military guys, and a local street gang. The area where these cops were killed is lousy with gangs.

You can read about my own incident here in part one, then you can find the rest of the story in part two and in part three. It’s a good story that tells how I was once arrested for aggravated battery and discharging a firearm into an occupied vehicle.

At any rate, it’s a bad neighborhood, and the VA Beach police are pretty ineffective, or at least they were 30 years ago when I lived there.

I used to express condolences to police when they were killed in the line of duty. I don’t any longer.

Civilized

Imagine living in a city where a person can’t wear nice clothes out of the fear of being killed for them by rampaging packs of criminal youths. Now imagine that defending yourself from those criminals is seen as not civilized. See this post

Read the thread. Any society where a person is murdered for their possessions and the best advice is “don’t be seen in possession of anything they want, and if attacked, give it to them and hope they spare your life” is a failed one.

Cyberstalking Cops

From wirecutter, we see that a man saw cops doing donuts in a local parking lot and posted video to the Internet. The local police union has begun posting videos and pictures of the man, along with his identifying information. I was going to comment over there, but my thoughts became too wordy for a comment.

The cops get caught by a citizen doing something that they would ticket others for, and a citizen posts video of it. The cops get in trouble, and a social media war ensues. Here is the issue. You, as a public servant, are driving around in a highly visible vehicle that has a huge billboard painted on it. We had things like this happen to the fire department when I worked there. You know that you are being watched, you can expect to be in the spotlight, and you act accordingly.

At most, the officer involved would get a talking to about “don’t do that again.” That wasn’t what happened here. The police union decided to up the ante by posting in a public forum what amounts to public threats against the citizen who did the reporting. At best, the actions of the union are poor optics, discouraging citizens from reporting crimes for fear of retaliation. At worst, the posts of the man are thinly veiled attempts at intimidating a witness to police’s illegal acts, which makes this witness tampering, a serious crime in itself. Go with cyberstalking or even witness tampering

Cyberstalking is a crime in Texas. Texas law includes provisions that prohibit stalking and harassment through electronic communication. Including email, social media, instant messaging, and other forms of digital communication. Cyberstalking is defined as the use of electronic means to repeatedly harass, alarm, or annoy another person.

Under Texas law, cyberstalking cases can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony. Depending on the specific circumstances of the offense. The penalties for cyberstalking in Texas can include fines, imprisonment. As well as a restraining order to prohibit the offender from contacting the victim.

A reasonable person would consider the statements made by the police through their union to be a threat. Here are some of the posts that they made, each of them included videos, photos, and links to the guy who posted the video of the cops:

Never post anything on the internet you don’t want to see on the news… or the internet.

If you are going to ghost ride your car, like Hamon Brown, make sure the doors aren’t locked when you climb on top.

Remember Hamon Brown? The hater that went on the news to run his mouth about police cars in the snow (in a parking lot)? #DontBeAHater #ComingDine #GotEeem

Tag local auto glass repair companies. We’re looking for someone who can help Hamon Brown get his broken windshield repaired. He didn’t get any Crime Stoppers money for s̷n̷i̷t̷c̷h̷i̷n̷g̷ tattling, so we need a good sponsor that can hook him up.

The police union also posted screen shots of the man’s criminal record.

Comments made by police officers to those posts include statements like:

  • I bet there is no weed smell coming from Hamon Brown’s vehicle
  • Throw stones at cops, expect cops to look at your glass house

In my book, that makes the police union (in this instance) a criminal conspiracy. To threaten a member of the public who reported criminal behavior, simply because it was a member of your organization, is no better than the mafia or the South American drug gangs. I hope this man gets a lawyer, and I hope he sues the police union, who by the way do NOT have qualified immunity. The loss in this lawsuit WILL come out of the police officer’s pockets.