Categories
COVID

Chloroquine and biowarfare

During the Vietnam war, the US Army had all soldiers who were in country take pills to prevent malaria. The Platoon Medic, referred to as “HOTEL”, came around every morning handing out a “little white pill” that soldiers called the “daily-daily,” and once a week he handed out a big orange pill.

That weekly orange pill contained chloroquine phosphate, 500 mg (equivalent to 300 mg of chloroquine), and primaquine phosphate, 79 mg (equivalent to 45 mg of primaquine). The combination of chloroquine and primaquine has proved much more effective—100% effective in servicemen who took the pill regularly—than chloroquine alone for the prevention of malaria due to Plasmodium vivax. However, it had no prophylactic value for malaria due to P falciparum in Southeast Asia. Therefore, those servicemen stationed in Vietnam, where falciparum malaria is endemic, took a daily dose of dapsone, 25 mg, (the daily-daily) in addition to the chloroquine-primaquine pill. It is approved by the FDA for that use.

How does it work? Chloroquine interferes with the degradation of hemoglobin by lysosomes in a malarial infection caused by P. vivax. One of the things that COVID does is degrade hemoglobin. The release of iron caused by hemoglobin destruction is what damages the lungs. This is why it makes complete sense to me that chloroquine containing drugs would be helpful in preventing hemoglobin destruction and high blood iron.

This also explains why COVID patients have such low blood oxygen saturation, and also why some patients with high saturations are having poor outcomes. The hemoglobin that is there is fully saturated, but since so much of it has been destroyed, the red blood cells simply can’t carry enough oxygen to meet metabolic demands.

Reading the study found here makes me realize that there are a large number of problems and target cells for COVID. I am convinced that this is a biological warfare weapon.

2 replies on “Chloroquine and biowarfare”

isn’t that what gain of function is really all about?…what other reason would you take a virus that may/probably never jump from an animal to humans and do some science magic on it and release it on humanity?…

In addition to that the EUA’s are under a Declaration of a state of Emergency using powers granted to the Sec of the DSS under the project Bioshield laws, the bio terrorism laws. There is some legal hand waving in Declaration about an Amending act giving them powers for natural biological agents but when you actually look at the wording of the law, its still just for engineered biological agents.

So either the Declaration is legally void. As are the EUA’s. Or they had more than enough evidence that SARs CoV 2 is an engineered biological warfare agent in Feb 2020 and kept it secret.

Hardly surprising as in a biological warfare reference textbook from 2018 one of the few naturally occurring viruses that were considered high probability for weaponization was.. SARS CoV 1.

This might account for the obsession with completed unproved and untested mRNA vaccines. Bases on the criteria outlines in the 1970’s and 1980’s biological warfare civil defense research mRNA vaccines unlike attenuated virus vaccines are perfect for quickly re-engineering for new variant targets. Typical of low intensity biological warfare.

As for how SARs 2 got out there. A combination of sloppy lab protocols and most probably another case of someone selling dead lab animals into the meat markets. Multiple cases in the previous 20 years in China. With the initial escape in April 2020. When Dr Jiang Yanyong was arrested. The guy who went public on SARs CoV 1 in 2003. Because that is how the CCP works. When it comes to official coverups. Just like in 2003.

Comments are closed.