A man is involved in an incident that involves a police officer being shot and another man killed. The court rules that he is incompetent to stand trial, so they let him go. Nine years later, he stabs two police canines before being shot and killed by police.
I understand why you would rule that someone is incompetent to stand trial. What I don’t understand is why that means the crazy person is free to go out and kill again. A video review of the man’s shooting is here:
0 Comments