Categories
Grooming Children Tranny Insanity

Keep it to Yourself

  • I don’t care how you want to get it on while in your own bedroom.
  • I don’t care if you think you are a man, a woman, or a Bantam Rooster.
  • I don’t care if you want to go on down to the courthouse and get married.

Just don’t expect me to join you in your delusions and sexual games, and keep that shit away from children.

11 replies on “Keep it to Yourself”

Q: What are you proud of?

Normal person: My kid just got accepted to medical school!
SecTranny Pete types: I suck dicks!

Unlike blacks, Asians, and Native Americans(not counting the Lizzie Warren types) they have to flaunt or shout their sexual preferences and perversions in public or no one would know. Just living life normally means you’re in the closet.

I’m thinking that in the coming New Dark Age, that the ones that survive, will be so far back in the closet they’ll stand a good chance of suffocating.

They discovered their genitals, how progressive and historic!
We all want to hear all about it. (not really)
As if your junk is some accomplishment.
Devolution is real and we are at the 250 year danger zone that Sir John Glubb theorized.

I can no longer take the libertarianesque position that what they do in private is none lf my business. The tolerance that underlies that sort lf thinking has begotten the very situation we are now in: first, the normalizarion and mainstreaming of extreme perversion, followed by the demand (backed increasingly by govt force) to not only accept but celebrate their depravity; no disagreements permitted. This is already transitioning (ha) into mandated complicity in their dysfunction, eventually we will be required to engage in the very acts that define them to prove our acceptance of faggotry. This is already exhibiting as refusal to date trannies being labeled sexist, “transphobic”, hateful and who knows what other mortal sins. The eventual take away is “you will suck the dick. And you will be happy”. How very schwabian. Fuck that noise.

These people are incapable of discretion and forbearance, they are loud and proud and now that they’ve got 90% of the camel under the tent, they want it up our asses also, and are using the govt to achieve exactly that. What do you think child grooming in govt schools is all about? Not just creating more perverts through the corruption of the mind, body and spirit. But also subverting the entirety of the society and culture by turning children against their parents values and authority. That is done by inculcating these disgusting behaviors and beliefs in them. Given enough time and lack of pushback, It will not only become a crime to speak against it, but faggotry will be defined as the baseline normality of society.

The very existence of faggots has become both dyscivic and dysgenic. Clearly there was a good reason Sodom and Gomorrah were wiped out in violently dramatic fashion. Leaving even the smallest remant risked them re-establishing their numbers and eventually their undue influence on others. Based on lived exeperience and observations over 5 decades, that is a part of the gene pool that needs a complete culling.

I can no longer take the libertarianesque position that what they do in private is none lf my business.

The libertarianesque position is perfectly valid. But the libertarianesque position does not include the slightest hint that any group deserves a subsidy or legal privilege at gunpoint by government. That’s your mistake. In the future, please do not confuse tolerance with legal privilege.

I’m not confusing the two. I’m openly stating that tolerance of these people is not a workable policy if one wishes to maintain a civil society largely free of the sort degeneracy and dysfunction they bring with them. Further, as a policy it should be scrapped in favor of forcing perverts back into the shadows where their influence on other people – and on policy – can be minimized. We’ve see where tolerance has gotten us. Look around and everywhere you will see the fruits of pandering to fruits. Amd they are just one of several groups who have gotten uppity and obstreperous to the point of being a force for destruction of society.

Tolerance might work if these defectives could be counted on to constrain themselves merely to acting amongst their own kind in private, instead of making a forced public spectacle of the things they do, and in trying to recruit others (again, the school angle). But they won’t do that because they want validation, and expansion of their power and influence, until they are running society for their benefit, and to the disadvantage of anyone who isn’t “them”.

So no, I will not tolerate them, and I look forward to others finally having their goodwill and patience exhausted and telling faggots to shut up and disappear, or that they will be made to do so, thereby removing their disgusting Influence from the mainstream. A backlash is inevitable, and they are inviting it.

As an additional reason to marginalize and constrain these people and their lifestlye, we have the matter of public health crises that they are largely responsible for. Monkey pox is just the latest being spread mostly via their buggery, but all STD’s are known to be an issue for the letter people due to their practice of having multiple partners and spreading stuff around. Tamp them down and we all benefit from reduced incidents of random threats like monkey pox gaining traction.

You’re confusing the two: Voting is the opposite of libertarianesque. Voting is by definition a low-grade shooting war between groups, all attempting to forcibly impose their lifestyle and religious and government subsidy/preference rules on each other. Rare sexualities are a red herring: the troubles in Ireland were between groups of straight white Christians.

You’re confusing the two: You can tolerate others without attempting to change them.

You’re confusing the two: You are submitting to obey policies you strongly disagree with. Why do you send your children to schools which you fund to teach stuff you disagree with?

WTF are you on about? I’m not confusing anything. My statements have been crystal clear. I know the libertariansque position is to tolerate. I am soldily against that position, and in point of fact have not accepted tolerance of faggotry for years already, openly criticizing them and those who are complicit in supporting the tolerance and acceptance of who they are and what they do. I have been outmatched by a soceity that is too sick to comprehend the error of it’s ways. And so here we are.

I have not voted for any of this. I no longer vote because it is a self-evident scam. I also do not advocate tolerating them without trying to change them; but precsiely the opposite. I don’t even want to change them, I want to see them destroyed so that I do not have to live in a society overrun with Goddamnable perverts interjecting themselves into every facet of existence.

Northern Ireland? That was one country imposing its control – and it’s state religion – on another. Clear enough who the party who initiated the aggression was, all that stemmed from that in response was a legitimate effort to reassert control over their nation and religious practices by the aggreived party. Just as native Northern Irelanders wanted the offending party out of their territory and affairs, I want faggots out of my territory and affairs.

And just like Northern Ireland, it appears very likely that I – and those who share my sentiments – will be forced into violent action, as the aggressors will not stop, and cannot be reasoned with. So, fuck them.

I have no kids, and even if I did there is no conceivable way they would be attending govt “schools”. That you have somehow inferred I have kids and am willingly sending them to be indoctrinated is a red herring and a non-sequitur.

To summarize this as simply as possible to aid in comprehension:

Libertarian minded people have long preached non-aggression and tolerance as long as no ones rights are violated. That posiiton is a bad joke because it fails to take human nature into account. Someones rights are always violated when one faction forces their way on another faction. Some factions are more worthy of building a culture around than others. Faggotry is not the basis for a functional society because it is a perversion, and is actively harmful to the physical and emotional health of all who practice it. It is a force of destruction, not of good.

MY position is to do whatever is needed, up to and including the wholesale removal of faggots from society by any means neccessary. As I already pointed out, tolerance is a failed experiment, and it has brought us to the current crisis.

Failing a successful effort at excising it, western civilzation will be destroyed – though it likely already is – by the ceaselss onslaught of faggots arrogating ever more power to themselves and their interests. There can be no confusion over that.

Comments are closed.