A liberal who admits that he didn’t watch a single moment of the trial, and who admits that he knows nothing about criminal law, is full of opinions on the Rittenhouse case, and claims that it sets a bad precedent: That anyone can pick up a gun and declare that they can go a “police a protest.”

He goes on to claim that this is an assault on free speech, because people will be intimidated because people can “show up with a gun” to stifle protests.

He claims that a person shows up to a protest with a gun is guilty of manslaughter, because a reasonable person should know that “something bad can happen” as a result.

Categories: Antigun


ChuckInBama · January 24, 2022 at 10:00 am

So, why would I even contemplate listening to an obvious peter-puffer like that ? My dog’s opinion means more to me. ROFLMAO !!! Libtards amuse me as much as they infuriate me.

Toastrider · January 24, 2022 at 11:52 am

“Protests”. Sure, Jan. When people are rioting, looting, and setting fires, that’s TOTALLY a protest.

No, this bottom feeder is just sad because suddenly violence runs the risk of a direct, immediate response.

The Old Man · January 24, 2022 at 1:06 pm

Parenthetically, I’d like to see this young binary type function in a disaster zone or maybe during a shortage of half-caff lattes in xir’s luncheon area. I’d be willing to wager a sawbuck the “vibrant” area inhabited has a new domicile search under way….

Big Ruckus D · January 24, 2022 at 4:30 pm

No way I’m going to watch that video. That is the most punchable faggot face I’ve seen yet this month. Nor do I need to dignify this cocksucker’s arguments (all of which are wrong) with a reasoned rebuttal. Fuck him with a rusty garden rake. Using a gun like Kyle did would be too good for this bespectacled buttfucker, and would waste valuable ammo.

Comments are closed.