The mainstream media reports on the Zimmermna case, with CBS news filing this report on the statements made by Zimmerman’s attorney. Of course, they had to insert the portions that support the narrative, when they had this to say:
Martin’s autopsy showed he was shot through the heart. Gunpowder
burns around his chest wound, called “stippling,” suggest Zimmerman shot
him no more than 18 inches away. The gun shot’s trajectory was
Diagrams also note Martin was hurt in the fight: blood on his head, a bruise around his eye, scarring on both hands. (emphasis added)
This is where the lies are to be found. Don’t take my word for it: read the autopsy yourself. On page seven, you will find the diagram that they are referring to.
Looking at the hands, there is one hand marked ‘scar’ and one marked ‘abr’. A scar is old injury, and would not have happened during the fight with Zimmerman. ‘Abr’ means abrasion, as evidenced by the fact that it is mentioned in the list of injuries on page three. The scar is irrelevant to the investigation, as is the one shown by the diagram on Martin’s right shoulder.
The note near the eye does not say ‘bruise’ for two reasons: there is no mention of it in the list of injuries, and ‘bruise’ is not the proper medical term and would not be used on a medical report.
The marks on the head part of the diagram are descriptors. The one on the head says “black short,” which is a description of the decedent’s hair, it most certainly does not say anything about “blood,” and the one which is on the eye says “Brown,” not “bruise.” Both of these descriptors can be found on page two.
So what we have here is the mainstream media trying to shape the narrative, either because they are seeing what they want to see, or because they are deliberately trying to mislead the public. In either case, they cannot be trusted.