Categories
Uncategorized

Subsidizing

When you want more of something, all you have to do is subsidize it. This woman makes $42,000 a year in food stamps and welfare for her 12 kids. On top of that, she got more than $30,000 in COVID money.

She actually thinks she is saving us money, though:

“I Googled it and it’s about $25,000 for a child to go to public school every year [from K-12.] It’s actually cheaper [for society] if I keep mine home,” she added.

Now she is a grandmother, so now she has bred a third (at least) generation of welfare recipients.

13 replies on “Subsidizing”

Oh yeah — she homeschools them. I’m sure they are going to race right out there and become productive members of society.

Between the habituated style of living off the dole, learned moral and ethical judgement that it is perfectly proper, and the likelihood of being barely if at all meaningfully employable, I think I can predict their future political party affiliation.

I’d LOVE to see an article later of how half of them overcome adversity and achieve greatness, but somehow I don’t think that is going to happen.

They will take it all away right when it is needed most and the unity hive collective comrade better vote CPUSA because that’s a nice chunk of change you have there and it would be a shame if anything happened to it.
How much free money was passed out in Venzeula, North Korea, Cuba?
Yes, rhetoricals are fun.

How many dads are in the picture?

The state needs to go after ALL the males that sired this dozen children for all the assistance paid by taxpayers.

The article says two fathers, the first one fathered the two oldest, and the rest were fathered by the other dad. I wonder what the child support payment is for 10 kids?

Should be earning a free tubal ligation. Like upon no more than the second taxpayer supported offspring. Like your tubes? You can keep your tubes as long as we don’t pay for your offspring.

Remember the outrage over “octomom”? Hell, she was a rank amatuer compared to this breeding sow.

Anyway, just more useful idiots to be culled in the coming Malthusian die off. Mother nature is a merciless bitch, and she always bats last. I can’t really worry about stupid shit like this anymore, the problems we are facing are so insurmountable that a massive collapse and liquidation of what has – or will yet – become surplus humanity is the only way out, as bad as that will be. We won’t change the way these people think or act, so they will simply have to stop thinking and acting, so to speak. Rest assured exactly that is being arranged by the very government they see as their provider and savior, as we look on in disgust.

I don’t enjoy thinking these things, but we all know that any species that outstrips the ability of its environment to provide adequate sustenance will either have its numbers cut down to what is manageable within said constraints, or will cease to exist entirely. The human evironment includes such factors as the ability to provide sufficient food, shelter, energy and medical care to insure survival at both the individual and group levels.

We have since passed the point where that is still going to be possible on a forward basis, given the number of non-contributors as well as exogenous events now extant, both natural and conveniently manufactured. Non-productive teat suckers like those who are the subject of this post will fail quickly when shit gets real. No easy money (thus no food and energy etc.) and no useful skills to make up for the lost entitlements=a short timeline for survival. And stealing to survive will get them dealt with quickly in the emerging reality.

Welfare moms wouldn’t exist if middle class WASP voters didn’t believe welfare should exist. Then again, after the Trail of Tears welfare was given to Native Americans to displace the adults as providers and prevent the children from needing to learn a work ethic.

MLK had a lot of vision but didn’t see through his communism, and didn’t recognize welfare as the trap it is. Because of the baby boom making the math unsustainable, Social Security is also welfare.

SS is even worse than welfare. They take 15% of whatever you earn and spend it on baubles, in exchange for a promise that you will get more money later, paid for by the taxes levied on the younger generation. Sooner or later the system becomes mathematically unsustainable, as all Ponzi schemes do.

There should be welfare benefits for a single mother with a child.
They should also be cut by 50% if she subsequently has a second child out of wedlock, and terminated completely if she has a third. If, at any point she is found to be using drugs, jail time and the kids go to foster care/adoption in perpetuity, and all future benefits for her are cancelled forever.

Stupid should be painful, and the state (which is everyone paying taxes) should have the firm determination not to subsidize that level of irresponsibility.

“Want your check? Take the depo shot. Don’t want depo? Here is norplant. Don’t want that? No check for you. If you can’t provide for the kids you have, then you have no business having more. “

Comments are closed.