CNN now says, well- it’s too crazy to paraphrase, so here is the quote:

Perhaps you posted that meme of supermodel Tyra Banks exploding in anger on “America’s Next Top Model” (“I was rooting for you! We were all rooting for you!”). Or maybe you’ve simply posted popular GIFs, such as the one of NBA great Michael Jordan crying, or of drag queen RuPaul declaring, “Guuuurl…”

If you’re Black and you’ve shared such images online, you get a pass. But if you’re White, you may have inadvertently perpetuated one of the most insidious forms of contemporary racism.

So to sum up contemporary equity theory: No matter what you do, if you are white, you are a racist. See, we already know that the mere allegation of a white man calling a black man a “nigger” is considered to be justification for aggravated assault in the minds of black people. There have been many court cases proving that. It’s called the “n word” defense.

a white person calling a black person a “nigger” is fighting words that justify whatever happens to the white person as a result of violence on the part of any black person within earshot.

In fact, the Nevada Law Journal has put forward the Critical Race Theory idea(pdf alert) that racial words activate a syndrome in blacks called “post traumatic slave syndrome,” which according to them is “a condition that exists when a population has experienced multigenerational trauma resulting from centuries of slavery and continues to experience oppression and institutionalized racism today.”

They claim that using words that hurt people’s feelings is a form of violence that justifies the use of force in self defense, but only if the person using them is a heterosexual white male. The justification is that: “The problem of psychological assault appears across ethnic, gender, and socio-economic lines, but has a greater impact on marginalized social groups such as women, children, African Americans, and the LGBT community.” They call the use of these terms Socio-Psychological Tyranny (SPT), and claim that the Second Amendment serves as a constitutional basis for the use of physical force in protecting the liberty, psychological, and dignity interest of citizens—that is, it justifies defending the spirit as well as the body.

But only against white males.

The article in the Nevada Law Journal is written by a Law Professor, who is laying down a legal argument for genocide against whites. How does he propose to do this? Changing the law. His proposed law would read:

A person is justified in using non-deadly physical force to ward off abusive conduct that the person reasonably perceives as creating a substantial risk of causing serious psychological injury.

“Abusive conduct” is defined as: conduct that a reasonable person would find hostile or offensive without superseding social, business or cultural value.

“Serious psychological injury” is defined as long-term injuries such as anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress.

In determining whether offensive conduct rises to the level of abuse, courts should weigh the severity, nature, and frequency of the conduct . A single act normally will not constitute abusive conduct, but an especially severe and egregious act may meet this standard. Abusive conduct may include, but is not limited to: repeated infliction of verbal abuse such as the use of derogatory remarks, insults, and epithets; verbal or physical conduct that a reasonable person would find threatening, intimidating, or humiliating.

The part that makes this truly worrisome, and specifically targets white males is this:

The question of whether the target’s response was reasonable should take into account power imbalances between the aggressor and the target, and whether the aggressor was previously aware of the target’s “emotional vulnerability and needlessly attempted to exploit that vulnerability.

Power imbalance is how the left justifies saying that blacks can’t be racist, because they have no power.

The paper then goes on to claim that “the Second Amendment was framed to empower citizens to counteract power imbalances.”

It goes on:

Clearly, the Second Amendment is concerned with tyranny and oppression and the founder’s notions of tyranny and oppression far exceeded the threat of physical violence. Severe emotional and psychological abuse, such as the use of the word nigger in certain contexts and sustained psychological violence in domestic situations, clearly constitute oppression. When the powerful commit it against the less powerful, it signifies a brand of tyranny: SPT.

Get it? You are white, therefore a racist. Since you are a racist, anything that you do or say, including simply being a white male, justifies the use of force to rectify that situation.

The stage is being set for a genocidal war between straight white males and the rest of the nation. White males are being “othered” and targeted for elimination. I seriously don’t want to sound like this is a racist website, but it seems like more and more, people like me are being targeted with calls to violence.

Categories: Race baiting


joe · March 26, 2023 at 4:08 pm

you would not be wrong DM…i’m half mex, half white…can’t tell you how many times people have called me a racist in my job…but i learned the best defense is a quick offense…i tell them i’ve put up with as much shit as they have and they can stick the race card where the sun doesn’t shine…shuts them up quicker than shit…it’s more of an us vs them war…the left uses racism because they need the blacks on their side, patriots and conservatives outnumber the left…

EN2 SS · March 26, 2023 at 4:59 pm

Welcome to the war, DM, better late than never. Lefitst/fascists/libtards/racists/demoncrats (I know, I repeat myself) want us dead and are not bashful or ashamed of saying it loudly and often. I keep wondering how long, when the killing starts, the thirteen percent, if all are on that evil side, will last against the eight-seven percent? As a side note, hispanics are considered caucasian and they don’t get along with black much at times, so I’ve included them as White.
I read that leftists use viagra and such to an amazing degree, while conservatives have guns/trucks/real women to attain that result. 😉
Interesting, if violent, times are in our future, be ready.

Vlad · March 26, 2023 at 5:06 pm

I’ve read some outrageous bullshit in my life but that article is in the top 5.
White pepo are racist. Got it.
Black folks cannot be racist. Got it.
Is the Nevada Law Review based out of San Franshitco?

Vern Knows What I Mean · March 26, 2023 at 5:21 pm

Tyra who? If they are so tough and hard and built everything then why get so worked up over a word that is in almost every (c) rap song?
What is your slave name is another term used by the brothas and a lot them are on the down low if you know what I mean.
The best part of getting older is not giving a shit about some face queef emanation insults or empty thought clouds.

Anonymous · March 27, 2023 at 12:53 am

The stage is being set for a genocidal war between straight white males and the rest of the nation.

I think you’re averaging male groups together that are different enough they shouldn’t be averaged. Plenty of straight white males in the big cities, but they aren’t male enough to fight back and thus remain in the gene pool. Instead, how about agitation for war against straight conservative rural males with lots of guns and hands-on skills who manufacture the fuel and food? Matt Bracken’s CW2 cube:

Francis W. Porretto · March 27, 2023 at 4:00 am

The NLJ article is what was once called “a straw tossed to the wind.” It’s an attempt to discern how far the “whites are racist” idea can be pushed. Watch for the reactions to it; they’ll be more indicative than the article itself.

tfourier · March 27, 2023 at 7:40 am

That paper is the academic (and legal) equivalent of toiler paper.

Its in a no status journal (Nevada?) by an “associate professor” (one step up from a TA) at a black college in Houston. That cant be all that great as its only comes in at 49 out of 77 black colleges. Somewhere in the high 500’s for all colleges.

So he is not exactly a legal scholar at a center of intellectual excellence. My guess is he might be legally competent enough to fight a traffic ticket. Maybe. And that’s about it.

Don Shift · March 27, 2023 at 8:23 am

I’m certainly not advocating anything but do white liberals and blacks not understand that if the rule of law ever collapses in this country, there will be a black genocide?

Time after time we have seen horrible stories of blacks targeting whites for atrocious violence. That’s analogous to lynchings of blacks in an earlier time. When things finally do collapse and boil over in this country, it’s going to be too difficult for people to tell the “good” blacks from the bad ones all of them will be simply lumped together and quite possibly shot on sight. The only way blacks will survive will be to self segregate totally because we know they can’t control the troublemakers and their population through self policing.

Tell me a damn shame that it has to come to that but unfortunately, that’s the reality that history has pointed out time and time again.

Danny · March 27, 2023 at 9:47 am

I’ve never been more proud to be caucasian at any time in my life than right now.

Elrod · March 27, 2023 at 11:58 am

” Plenty of straight white males in the big cities, but they aren’t male enough to fight back and thus remain in the gene pool. “

And the downside is……?

If, or when, things go all sporty, a rather large amount of preventive medicine will be administered at 400 meters, simply because it would be foolish, and stupid, not to. There will undoubtedly be a great many errors, both of commission and omission, but not seeking to manage and minimize risk would be, again, foolish and stupid.

That this is not being adequately conveyed to all and sundry is unfortunate, but I suspect even if it were it would not be viewed as cautionary reality but rather as incitement.

Comments are closed.