Trump’s Presidency will turn out to have been one of the most positively impactful events in recent history. The fact that he was able to put a right leaning SCOTUS in place is going to have a positive impact on the US for decades. In a landmark 9-0 ruling on Wednesday that you will never hear about in the media, the US Supreme Court has undercut all DEI-based discrimination, sending the Marxists into a tizzy. The case Muldrow v. St Louis, was decided on April 17 and can be read in its entirety here.
The US Supreme Court’s ruling that a St. Louis police sergeant can sue over a job transfer she claims was discriminatory because of DEI policies lays the foundation for legal action against employers who push discrimination against white people in job hiring, work assignment, and promotion.
That’s right, those “diversity-preferred” job postings, the practice of passing over whites for promotions, discriminatory job transfers, pushing unfair diversity trainings, etc…all of these are now legally actionable. The ruling was championed by human rights groups as “an enormous win for workers,” but has lawyers for companies like Disney warning that it could have a chilling effect on employers’ diversity initiatives.
Disney’s “Pale and Male is Stale” policy is a prime example. Disney has allegedly used it to drive out white animators by giving them the worst assignments, even though they have the most experience, skill, and seniority, in order to make the job humiliating enough that they quit…which many of them have done. The same companies argue that there is ‘good discrimination’ and “bad discrimination’, that white people should be purposely disadvantaged to pave the way for diversity. The lawyers stated that the decision will ‘complicate’ DEI programs and limit their ability to discriminate against white men. (Good) The Supreme Court torpedoed these claims, re-asserting that everyone is equal in the eyes of the law.
7 Comments
Bigus Macus · April 22, 2024 at 4:25 am
God knows the country is waiting for it to happen.
D · April 22, 2024 at 9:14 am
It’s just delaying the inevitable. People are cheering this while SCOTUS is still sitting there debating what “single function of the trigger” means…when the second amendment clearly says “shall not infringed”.
Divemedic · April 22, 2024 at 9:27 am
This comment illustrates one of the problems with pro-freedom people. They don’t seem to be able to understand how incrementalism works, and if they don’t get everything that they want, all at once and immediately, they give up.
The left is much smarter. They take what they can get, then return for more. That’s how they have eroded rights in this country- one small bite at a time over more than a century.
Will this country collapse? Of course it will. That which cannot exist forever, won’t.
That doesn’t mean that you give up, though.
D · April 22, 2024 at 10:19 am
I never said “give up” or “give me everything right now”. But this is exactly why we find ourselves in this current predicament. They take a mile, an then we celebrate gaining a foot.
Like you said, this nation will collapse. Will it be tomorrow? Probably not. Will it be in the next 50 years. Probably.
I’d rather fight the fight myself than turf it to my kids or grandkids. Just let it go. It makes target identification easier.
IcyReaper · April 22, 2024 at 3:30 pm
But you have to understand that political leanings mean nothing when the FBI or intell agencies have copies of videos from Epstein island of a judicial official, lets say a SCOTUS judge maybe named J Roberts, with little girls or little boys. What do you think will determine the legal outcome?
Look at the various SCOTUS rulings and what judges suddenly sides with the leftist side of court, being given they are all over the place and contradicting of political or correct legal interpretation of previous case law . Its still kabuki theater, the globalist allow some rulings that doesn’t interfere with the globalists plans but for the important rulings, .Gov gets what it wants. Fuck your Constitution, we run the show.
Dirty Dingus McGee · April 22, 2024 at 4:19 pm
SCOTUS decisions are one thing, enforcing them is another. The current powers that be have shown they have no problem thumbing their nose at recent decisions so I suspect this will also be given the cold shoulder. I highly doubt the regime will go forward on any enforcement or prosecution of those who chose to ignore this decision.
Divemedic · April 22, 2024 at 4:46 pm
This is a ruling that would be enforced in civil court, not criminal.
Comments are closed.