Laziness Can’t Be Retrained

When we recently built our pool, we were intending to care for it ourselves. The contractor that built it paid for the first month of pool servicing to get it started off on the right foot. At the end of the month, the pool servicing company came out and gave us a one hour lesson on the proper care of the pool and equipment. Of course, it was also a sales pitch.

It worked. They offered to take care of cleaning and servicing the pool, as well as keeping the chemicals in balance for $160 per month. That seemed economical to me, so we hired them. It went well for the first couple of weeks. The pool girl that came out did a good job, until she brought along a new trainee who would be taking over the route.

The new girl, Shamiqua, screwed things up from the start. The first week, she left the control panel open for the pool equipment and left it in service mode. It stormed that afternoon, and we were lucky that the electronic controls for the pool didn’t get water damaged. We complained, and they told us how she was new and they would talk to her.

The next week, she came out and didn’t bother cleaning the water filter. She left her filter cleaning tools next to the pool until she came back the following week, which indicates to me that she went a week without using them on anyone else’s pool, either.

The fourth week of her being on the route, and I watched her visit on the security cameras. She didn’t do ANYTHING but sit there on her phone for 10 minutes before leaving. The only thing that she did was retrieve her tools from the previous week.

We fired the company the next day. I received calls and emails from more than one person, asking us to give them another chance and saying they would retrain the woman. I told them that it wasn’t a case of substandard training. This woman was lazy and had no work ethic, and no amount of training can fix that.

The district manager offered to put another person on the route. I said no, we were just going to use a robot to clean our pool from now on. I spent $2,000 on remote monitoring equipment and a robot that automatically scrubs the pool.

The monitoring equipment tells me what chemicals to add, the robot cleans the pool. All I have to do is add the chemicals and empty the filter and skimmer basket.

When I am buying services or labor saving devices, my first and only consideration is value. That is, how much money would I make if I went to work for the same number of hours it will take to do the chore myself. If the cost of paying someone or buying a labor saver is less than half of what I would make, then I buy the product or service.

For example, mowing the lawn was taking me about 2 hours. You have to do it once a week most of the year, except winter, when you have to do it once a month. In total, I would spend about 90 hours per year having to mow the lawn. My choices are:

  • Hire someone. Lawn companies gave me quotes of $2400 per year to mow it for me.
  • A Husqvarna Automower that can mow my 3/4 acre costs just over $2000. All I need to do then is run a string trimmer around the edges of the house and blow off the driveway, which only takes about 8 hours per year.

I went with the robot. The same sort of choice was made with the pool. I can pay someone two grand a year to not clean my pool, or I can get a robot to do it. My lawn robot cost me a bit up front, but now that I have had it for over a year, it’s already paid for itself. Now I get free lawn mowing. The only thing I need to do now is replace the razor blades that it uses once a year.

So this is what minimum wage labor is facing- I can get a robot to mow the lawn or clean my pool for less than what it cost me to hire a lazy moron who won’t do a good job. The only barrier to automating these jobs is the large upfront cost, but once that is paid off, things get much cheaper. The bonus is fewer workers eyeing up the stuff in my house, and considering that the person most likely to burglarize your home is a worker who has been in it before, that’s a big bonus. Lazy morons need to watch out- they are about to lose their jobs.

Check it out, if you are interested. The robot is pretty cool:

The Numbers Don’t Lie

Except when they do. Why is Statista, using the FBI’s numbers, reporting that there were 21,504 murderers in the US in 2023, but also reporting that there were 17,713 murder victims? Or is this just statista skewing the numbers?

EDITED TO ADD

It’s Statista lying. The FBI crime report shows a total of 19,402 homicides for the entire country in 2023. Note that homicide is a blanket statement that includes murder as a subset. There cannot be more murders than there are homicides, therefore the true number of murders (and by extension, murderers) is less than 19,402.

Yes, I know that one murder can be carried out by more than one murderer, but these would seem to me to be statistical anomalies that would be more than balanced out by the cases where one murderer killed more than one person.

Socialists Clueless About Economics

I keep seeing things like this, and it really bugs me:

Since 2013, I have been warning those pushing for an increase in minimum wage that it will simply cause higher prices. I, along with others, have been shouted down and told how stupid and wrong I am.

Seattle and California have a $20 per hour minimum wage. The answer is “real communism hasn’t been tried.” People in the Seattle area now have to contend with $26 coffees and $32 sandwiches, with taxes and delivery fees comprising nearly 30 percent of the total bill. Instead of listening, the left is now demanding $33 an hour as a new minimum wage.

If $20 is good, and $33 is better, why stop there? Why not make the minimum wage $250 an hour? Then we can all be rich!

Next month, Florida’s minimum wage will increase to $14 per hour, a 61% increase from the $8.56 minimum wage in the state back in 2020. Not coincidentally, the median home price in Florida went from $306,000 in 2020 to $436,600 in 2025, which represents a 43% increase in house prices.

Rents saw similar increases. Rentals were costing a median of $1187 in 2020, and now are running about $1752 in 2025, a 67% increase.

Increase the minimum wage, and prices will increase to match. Economics, it’s a thing. The socialist blames a free market, but it’s market manipulation that is causing a huge chunk of this.

It isn’t just housing. As long time readers are aware, my Denny’s Grand Slam scale is a great example of this. That breakfast has 2 strips of bacon, two link sausages, two eggs, and two pancakes. A good cross section of food products. I have been using the price of this breakfast in the same Denny’s location since 1997 as an indication of costs.

  • Here we are in 2025, and the cost of that breakfast is now $14.19.
  • In 1997, that breakfast cost $1.99
  • In 2009, it cost $4.99
  • In 2021, it cost $9.29
  • Just a year later in 2022, it was $11.59
  • In 2023, the rate slowed a bit. The breakfast was $11.99 in April
  • By November of 2023, the price was up again, to $12.99

So the breakfast in 2021 was $9.29, and it is now $14.19, a 65% increase. It’s almost like prices across the board are increasing to match wages. It’s a simple rule- more money (demand) chasing the same goods (supply) equals higher prices. Now there is a bit of a mismatch, because population (which is also part of demand) has increased a bit, but it still illustrates the point.


Before any of my readers respond with “well, technically…” please understand that my relatively short posts are not an exhaustive treatise on the issue. Books have been written about this, and I am not writing a book here. I had one reader respond to a recent post that mentioned income taxes with a comment that stretched into more than 600 words, explaining that I had calculated the taxes incorrectly. This post went into details about exemptions, credits, and other factors that made my numbers incorrect. My posts aren’t meant to withstand an IRS audit. I use public sources and usually post links to them, but they are still meant to be quick examples to illustrate the point. Responding with an over 600 word comment to explain one insignificant sentence in a 450 word post is just silly.

Florida Taxes Rising 10x Faster than Population

Property taxes in Florida are skyrocketing.

The population of the state of Florida has increased the most of any US state, but the increase in population was still only 8.2% since 2020. Where is all of the money going?

Taxpayers are being fleeced. Ripped off to pay for DEI, illegal immigrants, and for government employees to groom your children to turn them into twinks and trannies. Enough is enough.

Politics of Caving

For decades, the way things have worked in Washington politics is for the Democrats to demand something, then offer a quid pro quo in order to make a “compromise.” Wash, rinse, repeat. It’s how we incrementally get more and more gun control, taxes, you name it. You give me a billion in funds for my district, and I will give you something that you want. The law then becomes a behemoth of special interests, graft, and corruption.

In the latest version of this, Chuck Schumer is holding Trump’s cabinet nominees hostage in exchange for Trump caving in and giving the Democrats $1 billion in cash for their favorite charities, which thanks do DOGE we now know will be funneled to provide funding for leftist NGOs, leftist movements, and ultimately into the pockets of Democrats themselves.

Schumer reportedly asked the White House to unfreeze about $1 billion of foreign aid and National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding in exchange for allowing the confirmation process for additional Trump nominees to move faster.

Schumer had this to say about Trump’s nominees:

Trump “attempted to steamroll the Senate to put in place his historically unqualified nominees, but Senate Democrats wouldn’t let him.”

Then Schumer also said:

Democrats have been “working all week to try and find a reasonable path to allow bipartisan Senate consideration, provided the White House and Senate Republicans met our demands.”

If Trump’s nominees are unqualified, then how will giving the left $1 billion make them more qualified than they are now? This is a shakedown, no more, no less.

Trump isn’t part of that Washington inside circle, so he refuses to play that game. He told Chuckie to get lost. So now they are in a Mexican standoff. It will be interesting to see how things shake out.

Trump tried taking the advice of “bipartisan” appointees and tried playing by the business as usual rules, and look what it got him. Years of impeachments, accusations, leaks, several assassination attempts, and most of his loyal insiders indicted and financially destroyed. So now he isn’t playing their game.

The Village

The left has taken the old saying “It takes a village to raise a child” to heart. Melissa Calhoun was a teacher who took to calling a child by their chosen name– that is, calling a child by a name that doesn’t correspond to their gender. (The child was unidentified due to privacy concerns) It’s been the law in Florida since 2023 that teachers cannot use any name for a child that isn’t the child’s legal name, unless they have written permission from the child’s parent. (Critics call it the “Don’t Say Gay” law) The child’s parent complained about Calhoun, and the she was fired as a result.

People who live in the area supported that teacher, who claims that she didn’t know about the law. Fifty people came out to support her. Fifty? I can draw more people than that for any number of causes. Despite the state law, the state board of education decided to reinstate her license. Parents don’t matter. The gay and leftist agenda is all that matters. They are grooming your children.

It Must Be Deliberate

This article has hit my feed several times recently, and the author is either deliberately being deceptive, or she is just a moron. The headline reads: “I Asked ChatGPT What Would Happen If Elon Musk Paid Taxes at the Same Rate as the Middle Class” The claim is made in the article that Musk only pays a tax rate of about 3 percent, because his net worth increased so much.

The article claims that Musk can dodge taxes by using the value of his assets as collateral to take out a loan, which isn’t taxed. They are demanding that we tax people on the unrealized gains of their assets, because rich people something something.

The author is comparing apples to Volkswagens. The middle class, for the most part, pays taxes on income. It’s right there in the name: Income Tax. In the article, you are talking about taxing the rich on their wealth. It’s two entirely different concepts. If the two were equal, the middle class would be paying taxes on the value of their house, not on what they make.

As an example, let’s say that an average guy and his wife are making the US median income of $80k. They have two kids, take the standard deduction, and are thus paying $9400 in income tax, plus Social Security, Medicare and other payroll taxes totaling $11,752. That makes this family’s effective tax rate 14.69%. However, his house is worth $40,000 more than it was last year. That $40k is an unrealized gain, and this lowers his effective tax rate to 9.7%.

Now look at Elon’s taxes. They are screaming that his wealth increased by $86 billion in 2021, but he “only” paid $8.6 billion in taxes. They don’t say what he actually made, just what he is worth. It just isn’t a proper comparison.

My opinion here is that the powers that be desperately want the ability to tax wealth. Currently, this isn’t permitted because the 16th Amendment only permits the taxing of income, not wealth. Once they get the power to tax what you own, and not just what you make, there is no limit to what all of us can be taxed on.

  • Your retirement account? 2% annual tax
  • Your house? 4% annual tax
  • You have a collectable car? taxed at 5% of its gain

The beauty of this, is that even if your unrealized gains are adjusted for inflation, the official rate of inflation is lower than the actual rate. So if they let you deduct 2% of your unrealized gains as being inflation, but the actual rate of inflation is 5%, you will pay taxes on that extra 3%.

This will make all of us poor in no time.

Economic Illiteracy

Read this to begin the post:

A maximum wage? So what happens when your doctor, lawyer, or accountant hits that amount in September, and decides to take the rest of the year off? You will pass a law saying that they have to work all year? OK, so those high wage people, being smart, do some math and switch to a three day, 24 hour workweek. Good luck getting a doctor on Thursday. That means doctor appointments will be even more difficult to get.

The funniest part of all this, is that it won’t affect the truly wealthy. They don’t earn wages. They make their money from investments. Cap those, and people stop investing, which will grind the entire economy to a halt.

Democrats really are economically illiterate.

Anchor Babies

Let’s just, for the sake of discussion, assume that birthright citizenship is actually the law. That doesn’t mean that any woman who gets creampied and pregnant before she sneaks over the border to have her child gets to stay. She isn’t the citizen, her child is. So when I see a video like the one discussed below, I have zero sympathy. She is getting deported. Her child can stay. If she wants to take the child with her, she can.

Her and her accomplice are caught stealing more than six thousand dollars in merchandise from all over the state of Florida. The police tell them that they are to be deported. One of them replies with, “You can’t deport me. I have a son who is American.”

Wrong. Your son is American. You are not. Get the fuck out.