This is a Sunday, and I am sleeping in. So I thought I would give you a repost of something that I said more than ten years ago.
Ignorance of the law, the judges and cops are fond of saying, is no excuse. In 1925, this is what a complete copy of all Federal laws looked like:

That one volume represents all of the laws that were passed by Congress in the first 150 years of this country’s existence. That Federal Law library has now expanded immensely.

What was one volume in 1925 expanded to become 22 volumes just 90 years later. That isn’t all, though. There is also the United States Code:

The number of federal crimes you could commit as of 2007 (the last year they were tallied) was about 4,450, a 50% increase since just 1980. A comparative handful of those crimes are “malum in se”—bad in themselves, which include things like rape, murder, or theft. The rest are “malum prohibitum”—crimes because the government disapproves, such as owning a machine gun made after 1986, when owning one made in 1985 is perfectly legal.
In 1982, the Justice Department tried to determine the total number of criminal laws. In a project that lasted two years, the Department compiled a list of approximately 3,000 criminal offenses. This effort, headed by Ronald Gainer, a Justice Department official, is considered the most exhaustive attempt to count the number of federal criminal laws. In a Wall Street Journal article about this project, “this effort came as part of a long and ultimately failed campaign to persuade Congress to revise the criminal code, which by the 1980s was scattered among 50 titles and 23,000 pages of federal law.” Or as Mr. Gainer characterized this fruitless project: “[y]ou will have died and [been] resurrected three times,” and still not have an answer to this question.
So you see, even the Justice Department of the US government is not sure of how many laws there are, yet each and every one of us is responsible for knowing every one of them, along with the court cases that modify and define them, upon penalty of prison.
That isn’t all. The laws passed by Congress are just the beginning. There are also several dozen Federal bureaus that have had the power to write laws since 1940. The laws that they write are called regulations, and they are found in the Code of Federal Regulations:

In 2013, the Code of Federal Regulations numbered over 175,000 pages. Only a fraction of those pages involved regulations based on something spelled out in legislation. If a regulatory agency comes after you, forget about juries, proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, disinterested judges and other rights that are part of due process in ordinary courts. The “administrative courts” through which the regulatory agencies impose their will are run by the regulatory agencies themselves, much as if the police department could make up its own laws and then employ its own prosecutors, judges and courts of appeals.
Then there are all of the court cases that decide what these laws all mean and how they will be applied. Here is a picture of the SCOTUS cases from 1790 to 1956:

Add in all of the cases from your Federal District and Circuit, plus all state and local courts, and you have quite a bit of reading to do.
The result of all of this is that each and every one of us is responsible for reading, understanding and following over 750,000 pages of laws, regulations, and court decisions- with complete understanding. If one were to begin studying these laws at age 12 and you read 50 pages per day, by age 53, you would finally have read all of them. The only problem is that, at the current rate, the government would have added another 500,000 pages of laws, and 28 years of reading to your quest. You would spend 75 years of your life trying to understand the laws that you must obey.
Remember, though: Ignorance of the law is no excuse. If you are spraying insect killer on some ants, and the can label says spray from 6 inches away, but you spray from 8 inches, you are a Federal criminal. If you are buying a gun, and you live in Florida, you had better use the abbreviation of FL as your address, because using the old abbreviation of FLA is a felony and can land you in prison.
Why is this happening? Ayn Rand gives us an insight into this:
The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren’t enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.
Truer words were never spoken.
22 Comments
Grumpy51 · September 7, 2025 at 7:20 am
TX legislature meets every 2 years. Good news right?
Well done- https://fox4news.com/news/texas-laws-now-effect-september-2025-marijuana-school-ten-commandments
Over 830 new laws that just went into effect……. So yeah, “ignorance of the law is no excuse” is for dullards and bureaucrats……
oldvet50 · September 7, 2025 at 7:44 am
I was reading the US Constitution the other day and I could not find where it is legal for Congress to delegate their authority to others to write law. Can you point me to that particular clause and section? Or is it an amendment since that power only existed after 1940? What party was in power in 1940?
Michael · September 7, 2025 at 8:01 am
Ann Rand the modern Tacitus
“The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws.”
― Tacitus, The Annals of Imperial Rome
Empires rise in strength, shudder in corruption and fall when debasement of those agreements with their people “Sound Law, Sound currency and the foolishment of hobby wars for the Bread and Circuses to keep the beer citizens happy.
Rome didn’t fall in a day they say. Mainly because communications were slower then. Horse messenger’s vs Internet you know.
WDS · September 7, 2025 at 8:55 am
The Ayn Rand quote reminds me of Lavrentiy Beria’s.
Steve · September 7, 2025 at 9:44 am
Way back in the before times, when I was in high school debate, I carried USC 15 in my briefcase. That’s the section on commerce and trade. I had the paperback version. It was about the size of the smallest of the paper-bound (yellow) updates volume in your one pic.
Henry · September 7, 2025 at 9:50 am
Another excellent blog entry – thank you DM. As I recall, the Constitution only mentions three crimes. The founders expected all other forms of crime to be matters for the states to handle. Yet, year after year our representatives in Congress feel compelled to make everything a federal matter, complete with associated criminal punishment. Worse, more and more of their criminal statutes implicitly lack any notion of mens rea. All these statutes mean it’s trivially easy for DAs to pile on charges to make a single criminal act appear to be some monstrously large evil event.
Differ · September 7, 2025 at 4:49 pm
But those laws do not seem to result in imprisonment of certain classes of criminal….who are released on their own recognizance and go.on to commit more crime.
https://www.indiatimes.com/trending/who-is-decarlos-brown-jr-14-arrests-mental-illness-and-a-violent-pastwhy-was-he-free-before-killing-iryna-zarutska-669253.html?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
SoCoRuss · September 7, 2025 at 11:26 am
The .GOV needs as many laws as the people will let them create and then some more, that way they maintain power and can use them as needed. Laws only apply when and to whom .GOV say they do.
The old statement about every American commits a felony every day has never been so true and the people don’t believe or realize it until they say something not approved then .GOV hits them with it.
BOTAN · September 7, 2025 at 11:51 am
Plus all the state, county, and city laws.
Like the saying goes, “You can’t get out of bed without breaking a law(s).
Then again I can imagine there is a law that you can’t stay in bed.
Old Maine Farmer · September 7, 2025 at 12:23 pm
God has 10 commandments. Just 10.
Stealth Spaniel · September 8, 2025 at 8:10 am
And still……we can’t keep 10, handed down from the Lord, God, himself. Why would anyone expect any other laws to be kept?? Oh..that is for the .Gov to protect itself.
Honk Honk · September 7, 2025 at 12:56 pm
The immaculate Chicago bathhouse messiah (THE ONE!) deleted the rule of law with the historic pen and phone?
The law of the jungle in Hobbes/Marx war of all against all?
Your terms are acceptable.
georgiaboy61 · September 7, 2025 at 1:27 pm
Law professor and blogger Glenn Reynolds has suggested that the constitution should be amended to create a house of Congress whose sole task is to get rid of useless, outdated laws still on the books. That is one possible solution to this problem, from his perspective.
Jay Dee · September 8, 2025 at 5:24 am
A simpler path would be a constitutional amendment that sunsets all federal laws and all federal agencies after 10 years.
Divemedic · September 8, 2025 at 6:00 am
LOL. Good luck with getting that passed. Even if it were to be passed, it would be as effective as the debt limit.
Steve · September 9, 2025 at 11:59 am
I’d prefer if legislation automatically sunsetted (is that a word?) on the death of the last Congresscritter who voted for it. Even better if their aye votes lasted only as long as they did. Most legislation would end pretty fast as the razor-thin margins most legislation passes with would very rapidly be lost.
Noway2 · September 7, 2025 at 1:38 pm
Looks like it’s time for a book burning.
it's just Boris · September 7, 2025 at 2:46 pm
Since I haven’t seen it posted above yet, let me point to the book “Three Felonies A Day: How the Feds Target the Innocent” by Harvey Silverglate.
Re filling out the ol’ 4473, yes. That, according to the smiling not-so-local gunstore counter guy, includes filling out your address as “(street number) (street name) LN” vs “… Lane” if your driver’s license uses the abbreviated version. I think it’s more on their end, to avoid attracting the Eye of Sauron, erm, ATF, but still.
Divemedic · September 7, 2025 at 6:06 pm
That book sucked.
Modern Day Jeremiah · September 7, 2025 at 5:10 pm
From Atlas Shrugged:
Dr. Ferris smiled. . . . . .”We’ve waited a long time to get something on you. You honest men are such a problem and such a headache. But we knew you’d slip sooner or later – and this is just what we wanted.”
“You seem to be pleased about it.”
“Don’t I have good reason to be?”
“But, after all, I did break one of your laws.”
“Well, what do you think they’re for?”
Dr. Ferris did not notice the sudden look on Rearden’s face, the look of a man hit by the first vision of that which he had sought to see. Dr. Ferris was past the stage of seeing; he was intent upon delivering the last blows to an animal caught in a trap.
“Did you really think that we want those laws to be observed?” said Dr. Ferris. “We want them broken. You’d better get it straight that it’s not a bunch of boy scouts you’re up against – then you’ll know that this is not the age for beautiful gestures. We’re after power and we mean it. You fellows were pikers, but we know the real trick, and you’d better get wise to it. There’s no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren’t enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What’s there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced nor objectively interpreted – and you create a nation of law-breakers – and then you cash in on guilt. Now, that’s the system, Mr. Rearden, that’s the game, and once you understand it, you’ll be much easier to deal with.”
Dan · September 7, 2025 at 7:23 pm
Ayn Rand was correct. Laws and rules equal control. And control is the ONLY thing the criminals in power care about.
Jay Dee · September 8, 2025 at 5:21 am
I recommend “How to Become a Federal Criminal: An Illustrated Handbook for the Aspiring Offender” by Mike Chase.
The book is quite illustrative. I discovered that I had committed a felony as a child by flying a kite higher than 500 feet within 5 miles of an airport.
Comments are closed.