ED Nursing Case

This is for my medical readers, a little pearl from critical care in the ED. This was a case I recently had in my care. Look at what decision making goes into critical care:

A patient presents with acute severe dyspnea consistent with hypertensive acute decompensated heart failure (flash pulmonary edema).

Initial Assessment:

Respiratory:RR 40/min with sternal retractions. Severe air hunger despite NIV. EtCO₂ 31 mmHg (hyperventilation, not ventilatory failure). SpO₂ 100% on NIV. Cardiovascular:HR 120 bpm BP 218/184 mmHg (marked sympathetic surge / afterload crisis)

Clinical interpretation:The patient was not hypoxic and not retaining CO₂, but was in extreme sympathetic overdrive with excessive work of breathing and anxiety worsening pulmonary congestion.

Intervention

Continued noninvasive ventilation (NIV). Morphine 2 mg IV administered as a targeted adjunct for refractory air hunger and anxiety. Reassessment (15 minutes post-administration)

HR: 95 bpm RR: 18/min BP: 142/72 mmHg SpO₂: 96% (clinically acceptable). Work of breathing markedly improved; patient calmer and tolerating NIV.

Teaching Points

Air hunger in acute heart failure is often driven by pulmonary congestion and sympathetic activation, not hypoxia alone. EtCO₂ of 31 mmHg confirms hyperventilation and preserved ventilatory reserve, reducing concern for opioid-induced CO₂ retention. Low-dose morphine (2 mg IV) in this setting blunts excessive catecholamine response, reduces central perception of dyspnea and panic. It produces mild venodilation, which lowers preload/afterload, and improves tolerance of NIV without suppressing respiratory drive.

Why this was appropriate: Although the use of morphine in heart failure is an old therapy that has been largely discredited in modern studies, it was appropriate in this case. NIV was already in place (airway support maintained), continuous monitoring, including EtCO₂, was available. The dose was anxiolytic, not sedating, and the primary threat was sympathetic storm, not respiratory failure.

Key Teaching Pearl

Morphine does not treat heart failure and can actually be harmful in many cases, but in rare, carefully selected patients, low-dose morphine can interrupt a life-threatening sympathetic–dyspnea feedback loop when NIV alone is insufficient.

Practice Implications

Morphine should not be routine in acute heart failure, consider only when:

• Severe air hunger persists despite NIVEtCO₂, which indicates hyperventilation (not CO₂ retention)
• Blood pressure and monitoring allow safe administration
• Always pair with definitive therapy (NIV, BP control, diuresis)

My charge nurse disagreed, saying all HF should be treated with nitroglycerine and loop diuretics. That’s simply blind protocol adherence. The doctor and I disagreed with that, to the patient’s benefit.

Bottom Line

This case illustrates that physiology-guided, low-dose morphine when used judiciously and with monitoring can be a safe and effective adjunct for refractory air hunger in hypertensive acute heart failure, reinforcing the importance of individualized clinical judgment over reflexive protocol avoidance.