Today is annual firearms maintenance day. This is the one day of the year that I spend going over each firearm in the gun safe, making sure it is in working order, and then placing them back into the deep sleep until they are needed, or until next year, as the case may be. Are the night sights still bright? Are all batteries either removed or working? Does the firearm need cleaning? It takes 4 or 5 hours to give all of them the once over. If a firearm needs repairs that take more than 10 minutes or so, then it gets red tagged and goes on the ‘to do’ list. With that out of the way, here is a filler post about firearms:
Choosing an EDC is a personal, opinion driven choice. Each of us has that one handgun that we like to carry, and none of them are wrong, because it’s a matter of opinion. Unless you carry a Taurus Judge, but even then, I know a woman who shot a rapist 5 times with one. He was found by the cops, dead in the bushes about 100 yards away. That’s a story in itself.
The only bad handgun choice is the one that is so poor that you leave it at home and wind up not carrying anything.
All handguns are a tradeoff. They have low power, short range, and don’t have as much firepower as a long gun like an AR-10 or an AR-15, as well as not having as much punch as say, a shotgun. We carry handguns because we aren’t sure whether or not we will need one, but it is useful to have one just in case. The chief advantage of a handgun is that it isn’t inconvenient to carry- not like a long gun, which is a pain in the ass to carry everywhere.
Remember, you carry a handgun in case you might be in a gun fight. If you KNOW you will be in a gun fight, endeavor to not be there. If that is impossible, bring a long gun and bring a friend with a long gun, if possible.
There is no such thing as “knockdown power” in a man portable firearm. Any firearm that produces enough force to “knockdown” a target will also, thanks to Newton’s laws, knockdown the person firing it. With that being said, there are a number of considerations that went into me selecting a firearm. The most important of them (in order of importance) are reliability, how accurate I am with that firearm, concealability, capacity, and the caliber.
I have owned a good variety of handguns. According to my logs (yes, I keep a log of every gun that I have owned in the past 20 years, but sadly don’t have a list of anything from before that time.)
- Beretta: Tomcat
- Colt: Combat Commander
- Glock Models 17, 19, 26, 27
- Kimber Pro Carry, Eclipse Custom, Ultra Carry 2, Raptor
- Para: 1911 Black Ops
- Ruger: P-95
- Smith and Wesson: Models 59, 5906, 4506, 4566, 4586, 637, 642, 686. M&P models 22, 9, 9c, 40, 45, 45 2.0, Shield models 9mm, 40S&W, 380ez, 45, Shield plus, Bodyguard
- Sig Sauer models 220, 226, 229 in 9mm and in 357 Sig, the Mosquito
- Taurus: PT45, Millenium
If a handgun has any sort of failure- whether it is a soft primer strike, a failure to feed, eject, or any other failure more than once in every thousand rounds, it isn’t a carry gun that I will rely on. It becomes a safe queen that is fun to shoot on range day, but won’t get close to EDC status.
Reliability
I found the 1911s to be too finicky, requiring customization and a good amount of work, and even then they weren’t reliable enough to bet your life on. Some of them are jamomatics- they jam every 50 to 100 rounds. Others are better, jamming only every 250 rounds or so. That still isn’t good enough. I’ve heard tell of 1911s that are good shooters, but most of those are $5,000 or more custom jobs, or the owners are constantly fussing over them, replacing springs and such. Still not good enough.
The Smith and Wesson Model 59 (my very first handgun) was not drop safe. I dropped mine once and it went off, shooting a hole through my dresser and into the wall.
The Third Generation Smith and Wessons are all of the ones with 4 digit model numbers- 4506, 5906, etc. They had a nasty problem- there were times that you would pull the trigger when the hammer was back, and nothing would happen. The hammer would stay back and not move. I don’t know why, but it would happen periodically. That was it for the Third Generation Smiths. I stopped carrying them after that happened a couple of times. This problem bugged me so much, that I didn’t buy another Smith and Wesson handgun for 15 years, and that one was a revolver.
Accuracy
The Glocks are good handguns, but I just don’t like to shoot them- they don’t feel good in my hand. I still have a few, but they just don’t go into the EDC rotation. The Ruger felt like holding a brick. For those reasons, I am just not as good at shooting them as I am others.
Concealability
The full sized and even compact handguns just aren’t concealable enough in Florida’s casual, hot weather dress. For that reason, we are limited to the subcompact and smaller handguns most of the time.
The Sig Sauers are great handguns, and I put a few trophies on the wall shooting IDPA with them. I loved shooting the 229 in 357 Sig. Hitting targets was almost intuitive with them. At one point, I was buying the Black Stainless version of them 2 or 3 at a time at a steep discount from CDNN, but that was so long ago that I was getting 357Sig ammo for $125 for a 1,000 round case. The 229s are no longer available from there. Still, they are a bit too large to be concealed very well, so you don’t see me carrying them very often.
Likewise, the Smith and Wesson 686 is an L frame revolver. It’s as hard to conceal as a full sized auto. I have toyed with getting a shoulder rig for it, but never have. That large of a handgun with only 6 shots is just a non-starter for me. It’s fun to shoot, but I likely will never carry it.
Capacity
The 642 is a five shot revolver. I don’t like carrying it unless there is no other choice. Still, it’s better than carrying one of the 380s, which I will also do from time to time.
The Shields in 45 have only one round more at a capacity of 6, unless you carry the extended mag to get 7. Now the extended mag makes it easier to shoot for a person with large hands, so it’s still a contender.
The Shield 40 has the same issue as the 45, bit with less power. So it’s largely out.
Caliber
The Beretta Tomcat was only a .32ACP. I got this one in a trade, where I traded a S&W 642 with a customized trigger to her because her hands would hurt using the Tomcat. I only carried it when nothing else would do. Since it wasn’t really suitable for carry, I eventually sold it.
The Sig Mosquito and the M&P 22 are not of a caliber that is suitable for carry. They are out.
What’s Left for EDC
For those of you keeping track, we are now left with the Smith and Wesson Shields and the 642, a J-frame revolver.
Those are the handguns that are in the EDC rotation. They meet all of the criteria that I have for an EDC handgun. The 642 is one I carry in either a pocket holster or an ankle holster. It was my favorite to carry when I worked night shifts on the ambulance. Strapped inside of my left ankle, it met all of my criteria and it was comforting to know that I wasn’t an unarmed target carrying valuable drugs in a bad neighborhood. This handgun was also written about my Marko when we were discussing whether or not the J-frame revolver was still relevant.
My favorite is the Shield Plus. The one l like is the ported Performance Center model that has a red dot on it. There will be a post on that tomorrow. It’s main drawback is how hard it was to find good leather for it. I went with a custom holster from Milt Sparks, but there was an 8 month wait to get one.
Even so, each of my handguns gets an occasional test drive, and some of them do get carried from time to time, but the 642, and one of the Shield Pluses are my main EDC handguns.
19 Comments
Mark · November 4, 2024 at 12:49 pm
What do you object to about the Taurus Judge? Only 5 rounds? Maybe the one you refer to was loaded with .410 shells instead of slugs or 45LC rounds? Just curious.
TakeAHardLook · November 4, 2024 at 2:44 pm
The Judge in .410 is a popular wepp on hikes here in AZ. Good for diamondback rattlers, so I hear. Better to drag a stick to make noise & vibration, though, ’cause a surprised rattler is an unhappy rattler.
Divemedic · November 4, 2024 at 3:52 pm
The Judge is mostly marketing hype. It fails as a defensive pistol in nearly every category.
At 9.5 inches long and 2 pounds loaded, it is less concealable than a boat anchor. With only a 3 inch barrel, it can’t use the power of the cartridges it is firing, so it’s underpowered. Even shooting 45LC, it hits 300 foot pounds with the 255 grain bullet, and bullet design in that particular cartridge is poor.
Read the box of Truth review here.
Loading it with 410 shells doesn’t help. A 27 inch pattern at 7 yards makes the 410 loadings not suitable for self defense.
It performs poorly as a defensive firearm. As pointed out above, all it is really good for is snakes and rodents.
The people who bought this were really buying marketing hype, not a serious defensive firearm.
joe · November 4, 2024 at 8:27 pm
it’s a good truck/car gun…410 to a car jackers face and pretty sure he won’t be back to bother you…really that and messing around at the range is about the only good it’s for…maybe take it fishing the pond for cotton mouth or like mentioned above hiking for rattle snakes…
oldvet50 · November 4, 2024 at 2:39 pm
I use a sling bag worn in front that is only a tiny bit ‘cooler’ that a fanny-pak worn in front. It easily carries my phone, wallet, keys and 2 extra mags. The rear access (close to my chest) contains my Glock 27. It is difficult for a fit (not fat) person to carry concealed in Florida. Since man-purses are now ubiquitous, I never get a second look.
TakeAHardLook · November 4, 2024 at 2:39 pm
Nice review of some nice wepps!
I did the LOL plus EyeRoll when I saw your post ’cause I predict that you will soon have big numbers of clicks.It’s a variant of “caliber wars” and “holster wars,” everybody has (just like buttholes) an opinion on same.
You mentioned the Florida climate, heat & humidity, etc, needing a casual, light clothing style not conducive to CCW [though it might be better to call it “private carry of weapon–PCW, as CCW sounds like something that a criminal would do].
Saw a newer holster recently, the PHLster Enigma, with a light, space-aged alloy frame that purports to holster virtually any handgun with ease and discretion. I was thinking of getting one but it will come with divorce papers: “What’s that? Another gun? Oh, a holster–FOR ANOTHER GUN?
Yeah, that’s kinda how it rolls here. Until the Zombie Apocalypse. THEN, my gal will be solidly behind me (and behind my Benelli M4, my vicious little Home Security Beast)!
If you know Clint Smith of Thunder Ranch fame (lotsa interesting YouTube vids) you may be interested in his opinions on….things:
On the .380: “I wouldn’t have one up my ass if I had room for a tugboat.”
On a CCW choice: (paraphrasing) “I wanted a .45ACP so it would hit the guy in the arm, breaking it, then zing off into his chest…” (Clint likes .45s I guess).
Anyway, great post, thanks.
Divemedic · November 4, 2024 at 2:58 pm
I own a few guns in 45, but they aren’t the ultimate man killers that the Boomer Fudds claim them to be. In truth, all handgun calibers suck. They are handguns.
A 380 isn’t a great handgun choice, but there are times when a 380 is better than a pointy stick. A 380 is delivering the same energy and same bullet weight as a 38 Special.
Clint Smith is 75 years old. The 45 was a great caliber when it was brought about because:
– the military can only shoot ball
– handgun bullet design sucked for decades
For those reasons, handgun bullets sucked, so large diameter and heavy ruled the day. The truth is that bullet design has come a long way in the past 40 years. It’s at a point now where the difference in handgun bullets is not really important. Pick a modern bullet that is delivering 350 foot pounds at 110 grains or more, and caliber doesn’t matter. (and note that neither 380 nor 38 special meet that requirement)
TakeAHardLook · November 4, 2024 at 9:38 pm
Yep. Good info. I recall on a caliber wars forum that someone mentioned a definitive FBI study on injuries/fatalities by caliber. Their primary finding?
That HITS on the body were what counted, .22, 40 S&W, .357–no matter–HITS were the deciding thing. A variant of “a miss is as good as a mile.” A .22 round would put a perp into the morgue as often as 230 gr of .45 RN.
And your comments on bullet design are spot-on: Federal, Hornady, Remington–all have their JHP “Golden Saber” expander types that create a big injury void and a nasty exit would for big bleeds.
But the target must still be hit!
MiniMe · November 4, 2024 at 3:26 pm
Thank you for posting this.
I usually inspect my guns/rifles before taking them to the range, followed by a good scrub down before storing them. Been meaning to pick up a month to do a check-up of everything, so this is a good reminder to stop being lazy and get-r-dun.
Danny · November 4, 2024 at 4:34 pm
I usually carry a 442 – concealable and reliable.
And there are decent options for self-defense cartridges in .38 special too.
Divemedic · November 4, 2024 at 6:44 pm
A +P+ load will move a 110 grain projectile out of a 2 inch barrel at 1100 feet per second. That works out to 296 foot pounds. Still not great.
bill · November 4, 2024 at 6:11 pm
At 69 finally found MY perfect handgun–SIG Fuse,feels like a larger Shield,I wear shorts/Hawaiin shirt-conceals perfect—it is a shooter
Divemedic · November 4, 2024 at 6:45 pm
Every person has to find the firearm that they can achieve fast, reliable hits with. I would rather hit someone with a 22 than miss them with a 45.
joe · November 4, 2024 at 8:33 pm
DM, have you tried diff lowers with any of your glocks?…i have a dagger and shot the micro daggers (43X/48 clone) and they just feel better…may look at some other lowers to transition my 17…i have a micro dagger slide i put on my 43X…haven’t got to shoot it yet…kind of a glock guy after carrying one for almost 30 years for work…never had an issue with any of them…but like you said, it’s a personal choice…everyone has a favorite gun…one of my favorites was the browning hi-power i had…kick my self a lot having sold it years ago when i was young and more stupid…
Noway2 · November 5, 2024 at 10:40 am
Interesting blog, thank you for posting. It gives me some things to think about.
I do have an FN 5-7 that doesn’t pass the reliability test, which is irritating, and hence it doesn’t make the EDC list either. It tends to stove pipe and then leave the next one stuck / jammed in the chamber. I know it’s not limp wristing and it doesn’t seem to be magazine dependent either. Typically the choice comes down to my Glock 26 or XD Mod 2, which has a better grip.
lynn · November 5, 2024 at 3:36 pm
My EDC is a Ruger GP100 .357 seven shot revolver with a 3 inch barrel and Houge monogrip. Great shooting gun.
https://ruger.com/products/gp100/specSheets/1715.html
Matt · November 6, 2024 at 4:11 pm
I live in the NE so my requirements for 1/2 the year are different.
I have a 3″ GP100 for woods critter use
I have two Colt Commanders I carry – my primary is a .38 Super (great feeding) that has been my primary for a very long time. The big thing with them is that I do the maintenance and watch the magazines – two things most people will not do. YMMV
The commanders and the GP100 all have basically the same Novak sights.
I have a old Colt Cobra that I carry as well and works great in a winter coat pocket.
I occasionally carry a P30, a Glock, a few other wheel guns just for kicks. I have been looking at the Shield Plus and a few other small 9s finances and focus have kept me from making the switch. That and I have not had the time to put the work in to be as natural with my Colts as I would be with a new gun.
Mayt · November 6, 2024 at 4:19 pm
https://ruger.com/products/gp100/specSheets/1753.html
Lynn, The Novak’s are a definite upgrade
Micro Dot – Area Ocho · November 5, 2024 at 5:33 am
[…] I went to do the annual run through on the cold safe, I discovered that the microdot wasn’t working. No sweat, just a battery change. After […]
Comments are closed.