The entire 4th circuit court of Appeals has ruled that the AR-15 is a “weapon of war” and is not protected by the Second Amendment. Shit is about to get spicy. Don’t count on the courts to stave this off.
Categories: Antigun
Antigun
Second Amendment Questions
A leftist judge, in an obvious attempt to make the Second Amendment look ludicrous, has ruled that the law prohibiting illegal immigrants from possessing firearms is unconstitutional. The case at hand centered on Carbajal-Flores, who was “charged Read more…
7 Comments
Roadgeek · June 8, 2022 at 9:51 pm
You’ve linked to a story published
Feb. 22, 2017, 9:24 AM CST / Updated Feb. 22, 2017, 9:24 AM CST
Divemedic · June 9, 2022 at 5:19 am
I know.
Uncle Bobcat · June 8, 2022 at 10:16 pm
Yes, apparently from 2017. Does anyone know if the ban has had subsequent challenge or review?
Divemedic · June 9, 2022 at 5:19 am
It has not. That is why Maryland’s AWB still stands.
Rusty · June 9, 2022 at 5:01 am
https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/1534743624088530944?cxt=HHwWgMC98brMwMwqAAAA
“Today the Supreme Court invoked “national security” to consummate the immunization of federal agents from liability for violating the Constitution. Many people are likely unaware that if a federal agent illegally barges into your house, you have essentially no recourse”
As someone who’s not from the US, that sounds like a really bad idea, if it’s true. A little thing like ruling AR15 is a weapon of war doesn’t matter in that case.
Divemedic · June 9, 2022 at 5:20 am
Oddly enough, I already had scheduled a post on that for this morning.
TimD · June 11, 2022 at 2:26 am
How interesting, US vs. Miller says only the ownership of military-type weapons appropriate for use in an organized militia aren’t protected.
Comments are closed.