The author of this piece is Dr. Tom Hastings, the conflict resolution coordinator at Portland State University. Portland. Enough said, but let’s look closer at his nonsense anyhow.

It is long past time to repeal the Second Amendment.


To strengthen democracy.

I don’t want democracy. With democracy, 50.1 percent of the voters would be able to legalize slavery. The voters could easily vote to euthanize everyone over the age of 65, or even confiscate the property of everyone who has a net worth of more than $500,000 so that it can be redistributed. The beauty of our system of government is that, while they are democratically elected, our representatives can’t violate the rights of the individual.

Already in 2022, as of Sept. 25, there have been 32,643 gun deaths in America from a variety of causes, including murder, homicide, accidents and suicides. Many of these deaths were in places that attempted strict gun control, including a ban on assault rifles, but were successfully sued by the NRA or other gun rights groups and their local or state laws vacated by rulings prompted by the Second Amendment.

Let’s start with the “gun deaths” metric. First, a “gun death” is a stupid metric. An early death is no more tragic if carried out by cancer, diabetes, being tossed out of a helicopter, or simply beaten over the head with a hammer.

Second, more than 26,000 of those “gun deaths” were actually suicides. A person intent on killing themselves could, if guns were outlawed, simply step in front of a train, leap from the window of a tall building, or overdose on sleeping pills. Getting rid of the Second Amendment would not save the lives of anyone intent on suicide. The fault in logic here is stunning- the left contends that people who wish to take their own lives would not do so if there were no guns in the home. Ridiculous and easily demonstrated as a false premise. In the United States, over 48,000 people take their own lives each year, and there is no reason to believe that things would improve with the outlawing of guns. Take Guyana as an example, where the government has passed every single dream of gun control proposed by the left.

In Guyana, Category B firearms are only available to sport shooters who hold a license to practice for at least 6 months, with a medical certificate, without a criminal conviction, and additionally require at least three shooting sessions with an instructor. Specific purchase and possession permits can then be applied for from a local police department, are valid for 5 years and can be extended. These weapons can then only be used for sport shooting in shooting ranges, never for hunting. Category B includes all assault rifles such as AK-47/AKM, AK-74 or AR-15/M16/M4, as well as all similar weapons, even if they are chambered for rimfire (.22 LR) cartridges. These can only be semi-automatic. All handguns, including those using rim ammunition, are classified as Category B. It is illegal to possess these Category B weapons after the expiry of a specific non-renewed license: the weapons must be disposed of (e.g., sold to a firearms store or otherwise destroyed).

Meanwhile, Guyana has the highest suicide rate of any nation in the world: 40.8 suicides per 100,000. That number represents a suicide rate three times that of the United States. So gun laws have no effect on suicide rates, which are more of a mental health issue than they are a firearms issue. In Guyana, the suicide problem is related closely to alcoholism, not guns.

Civilized countries enact laws that actually protect their children. Unlike every single other developed or large country in the entire world, the number one cause of death for children in the US is firearms. 

Wrong. Homicides don’t even come close to being the number one cause of death, even including homicides by all mechanisms. Unless you consider 15-24 year olds as being children.

The simple fact is that more than half of the homicides in this country are actually due to street gang activity where one gangs are resorting to violence in order to protect their drug dealing turf. I don’t need to go any further- this guy’s post is filled with enough factual deficiencies that we already know he is lying to support his agenda.

To prevent Civil War 2.0.

With approximately 400 million guns floating around US society and an armed MAGA-driven polarization met by an increasingly armed leftist radical wing, along with evermore virulent rhetoric and escalating numbers walking around open-carrying war weaponry in public, half of America believes that civil war is coming. Tossing out the Second Amendment would free legislatures and city councils to begin seriously ending such belligerent displays of combat weapons. 

During Vietnam, the left thought they were clever by asking “What if they threw a war and no one showed up?” The more important question is “What if they threw a war and only one side showed up?” The answer to that is, of course, genocide. Disarming one side allows the other side, still armed, to do with the unarmed as they please.

It’s as if he thinks that getting rid of the Second Amendment would cause the 600 million plus guns already in US hands to simply disappear. Instead, the repeal of 2A would cause many of those 600 million guns to be used against the very people who would be attempting to confiscate them, guaranteeing the onset of an American civil war.

This guy, who is supposed to be interested in conflict resolution, is advocating for the one thing that is guaranteed to cause more conflict than any other single thing that the government could do. Clueless, but the left’s ideas usually are.

Categories: AntigunFake News


Max Wiley · January 13, 2024 at 11:24 am

Useful idiots are gonna proselytize for the two-digit IQ masses, that’s kind of their job description.
Logic and facts have nothing to do with it.

W Wilson · January 13, 2024 at 12:51 pm

Yes , we have a constitutional republic , not a democracy, but the communists in this country keep trying to take rights from us . When I lived in califukya , we voted on gay marriage . We , the majority, voted it down. But the courts said we couldn’t. Can’t take a minorities rights. But that doesn’t stop communists from taking my rights , and the courts do nothing.

Michael · January 13, 2024 at 1:39 pm

Has anybody proof that a talking point liberal has ever changed his mind about Guns from logic and facts?

Asking for a friend.

Who said that “Don’t try to teach a pig to sing, it wastes your time and annoys the pig”?

Cederq · January 13, 2024 at 1:43 pm

I went there for my advanced degrees in the mid 80s… I still carry scars on the inside of my cheek and tongue from biting my tongue and chewing on my cheek not to pull my carry piece and start shooting idiot students and more idiot instructors. Big reason I went, I lived in the Portland area, worked at a Portland hospital in a job I loved and it was close and had the programs I needed. Other than that, I do not belong to the alumni association or donate to that festering boil. I didn’t didn’t even go to my graduations ceremonies. For a while I would get letters and phone calls to donate and would rudely and as crass as I could be demand they take my name off of their lists, I got an education from them and paid for it myself, I didn’t owe them any more of my time or money.

Xzebek · January 13, 2024 at 2:01 pm

The leading cause of death of children under 1 is abortion.

Dirty Dingus McGee · January 13, 2024 at 2:30 pm

“It is long past time to repeal the Second Amendment.”

And I also want a polka dot unicorn.

pchappel · January 13, 2024 at 2:36 pm

“Conflict Resolution” can mean different things… All depends how that term is defined… If you kill off everyone opposing your point of view, the conflict is resolved. Sort of the Soviet definition of “peace” being “lack of opposition to worldwide communist domination”…

TCK · January 13, 2024 at 4:10 pm

Liberals: Spend decades trying to legalize gov’t assisted suicide.
Also Liberals: We must ban guns to stop people from committing suicide.

lynn · January 14, 2024 at 12:46 am

Repealing the Second Amendment would cause an immediate Civil War in the USA.

tfourier · January 14, 2024 at 7:45 am

I’ve met lots of people like “Dr.” Tom Hastings over the decades. In person they are the most doctrinaire, authoritarian and intolerant of differing opinions of others you could ever meet. Generally not the brightest folk either. The ones that are not narcissists or outright sociopaths.
Which is all of the “activists”.

Once it becomes obvious that you know your history, know the data not their talking points, and refuse to be distracted by their strawmen arguments and usual rhetorical tricks, the brighter ones will just change the subject. Maybe 1 in 20. But most just walk away. Because they just hate being contradicted. Because it turns out they usually just dont have a clue. They can only parrot the catechism of some kind of trickle down Marxist theology.

As I said. Narcissists or one kind or another. When you understand that it makes dealing with them so much easier. Its all about them. Really. The subject being discussed is secondary. So facts data etc are irrelevant. So shut them down quickly and move on.

oldvet50 · January 14, 2024 at 8:46 am

Remember, gang rape is a perfect example of democracy. Isn’t rule by majority always right?

Jonesy · January 14, 2024 at 9:50 am

One thing important to note. Pay attention to the words being used by the left. From Sock Puppet Joe on down, “democracy”, and how we have to save it is replacing “republic”.

If something seems anathema to democracy, even our BOR, the left will villanize it. Get enough people to forget about the constitution, and there won’t be anyone left to defend it.

Phil B · January 14, 2024 at 2:53 pm

Massad Ayoob braks down the numbers in a Youtube short and points out that the number quoted also includes Police shooting criminals and defensive gun use:

Mike in Canada · January 15, 2024 at 7:54 am

I have been fighting gun control for more than thirty years, in various ways. If this discussion had anything to do with logic, reason, fairness, or common sense, it would not still be a discussion. There is obviously an agenda at play, that will not be diverted.
The only thing we can do is massive non-compliance, and begin the process of renewal.

Comments are closed.