President Biden made a speech on gun control in New York. He said that

When the [Second] Amendment was passed, it didn’t say that anyone could own any kind of gun and any kind of weapon. You couldn’t buy a cannon when this Amendment was passed, so there’s no reason why you should be able to buy certain assault weapons.

President Joe Biden on gun control

The Amendment didn’t say that, for two reasons: First, the Amendments to the Constitution don’t say that people can do anything. The Amendments say that the GOVERNMENT can’t do things. The government can’t infringe on the right keep to bear arms, is what it says. Second, people DID own cannons. Privately organized and funded artillery companies in the colonies date all the way back to the 1630s. A century later, in the 1740s, there are records of Benjamin Franklin helping organize artillery companies while stressing that they were made completely of volunteers and armed at their own expense.

One of the driving forces behind the first major battles of the Revolutionary was because the British soldiers were coming to confiscate privately-owned arms – including cannons and mortars – such as ones that were being held by veterans of the French and Indian War as war trophies.

In fact, there were people who owned entire warships. See my post on this from 2013.

During the course of the Revolution, approximately 1,700 letters of Marque were issued to privateers. In the War of 1812, President James Madison issued more than 500 letters of Marque to privateers. These letters of marque created what was, essentially, legal piracy, and it was sanctioned by the government and even deemed necessary. So how did these privateers arm their vessels? With cannons that they purchased as individuals.

Our colonial navy had approximately 1,200 cannons on board less than 65 ships. The privateers, on the other hand, had almost 15,000 cannons – all privately owned.

The National Firearms Act of 1934, which is, by far, the most restrictive piece of Federal legislation related to the ownership of arms, says nothing about cannons. It wasn’t until 1968 that things we regard as modern artillery were regulated further when ‘destructive devices’ were added to the law.

But muzzleloading cannons, like the ones used during the Revolutionary War remain conspicuously absent in any legislation. You could buy a cannon as an individual in the Revolution era, and you can still buy one today as an individual.

The President then went on to say that the DOJ will be issuing restrictions on guns made at home within the next few weeks, what he calls a “National ghost gun enforcement initiative.” He also took a shot at the “assault weapon” boogieman.

You know, futures cut short by a man with a stolen Glock with 40 rounds. A magazine with 40 rounds. And it’s really a weapon of war. One of the things I was proudest of years ago when I was in the Senate, I was able to get these weapons and the size of magazines outlawed, that got changed, got overruled, but I don’t see any rationale why there should be such a weapon able to be purchased. It doesn’t violate anybody’s Second Amendment rights to deny that.

President Joe Biden on the ’94 Assault Weapons Ban

The law didn’t get overruled. It expired. Because the law had a ten year expiration date built into it.

The President is also claiming that outlawing weapons doesn’t violate your right to own them. Since when?

Categories: Antiguntyranny


It's just Boris · February 4, 2022 at 7:27 am

What did you expect from him, honesty and well-reasoned arguments?

The Great Leap Potato · February 4, 2022 at 7:33 am

Isn’t the 1968 act a direct copy of the NSDAP [Nazi] act.
But, but, but, muh democracy, muh fweedom?
They can’t have the YT genocide until the guns are gone.

    Miles · February 5, 2022 at 5:27 am

    It’s not a ‘direct’ copy, but it is surprisingly close.
    JPFO still has a book available that compares the NAZI gun control law with GCA 68
    The story is that Senator Thomas Dodd, one of the main staff members of the U.S. at the Nuremburg trials and later the chairman of the Senate Judiciary committee that devised GCA 68, brought a copy of the Nazi gun control laws back with him, had it translated and used it as the basis for it.

joe · February 4, 2022 at 7:53 am

this is probably the only reason we didn’t get tested like the australians… the 2A…

Danny · February 4, 2022 at 9:06 am

When the government owns arms that the people do not, or are not “allowed” to own, there is a disparity of force. Although not stated verbatim, the intent of the 2nd Amendment was – and still is – for the citizens to be armed like soldiers if they so choose.

Let’s call that “equitable.”

    Jonathan · February 4, 2022 at 10:37 am

    Well said!
    Letters of marque were issued because citizens could do the job better and more cheaply than the government.
    And calling him a Potato is about the nicest I can think of calling him…

Russell G. · February 4, 2022 at 1:03 pm

Insert NICS background check table about here

Xiden has zero mandate here. He knows it. Another smoke and mirrors game for the AOC crowd. Guess who has been buying the largest percentage of heaters in the last year or so? “Them”, that’s who. Other than enlarging the BATF/administrative state with line item positions, nothing will get rammed through anywhere. That just means that there will be more neckbearded morons in field offices that can’t read blueprints contained in form 1’s.

Comments are closed.