A few years ago, a hurricane passed over my house, and even though the weather service was telling us that the winds were hurricane strength, the wind didn’t look that bad, even when the eyewall was over my house. So I bought a personal weather station.

Last night’s wind never went over 30 miles per hour here, and I watched online as the storm made landfall near Perry, Florida. The power is out in the area, so I can’t pull up many weather stations, but the one that is still online in the area is reporting the fastest winds at 52 miles per hour.

I would very much like to see the weather stations that were exactly on the coast to see what the real winds were. I think that the NWS has been overhyping these things for years. I do know that “subtropical” storms were not included in named storms until 2002. What does this mean? In the 29 hurricane seasons that subtropical storms have been added to the naming system, there have been an average of 16 named storms per year, with only 4 of those seasons seeing fewer than 12 storms. In the 19 seasons prior to 2002, there were an average of 11 named storms per year, with ten of those seasons having fewer than 12 storms.

So why did the criteria for naming storms change? If you look at the statistics for named storms, something jumps out at you. The number of storms drastically increases beginning in 1995. What changed in 1995? Was it global warming?

Nope. The director of the National Hurricane Center, Doctor Bob Sheets, retired in 1995. The director of the NHC sets the criteria by which storms are classified. Politics, or science? Now the left can point to the larger number of named storms and blame the climate change boogieman.

I am not saying that the people who are dealing with damage are not suffering. I am saying that the NHC is overstating the strength of these storms in order to support pushes for “green new deal” type laws.

Categories: climate change

2 Comments

Dirty Dingus McGee · September 27, 2024 at 8:43 am

What I’m finding amazing about this storm in particular, is how many folks seem to have lived thru this UNSURVIVABLE storm. Not to make light of ANY death from the storm, but if you believed what was being said, the state of Florida should be a mass casualty event.Is there damage? Yes. It was a strong storm, there will always be damage.

And their guess was off for my area. Last night it was supposed to have 50-70 mph winds in my area. About 3am it quietly changed to 20-30mph gusts.And the track took it further east and quicker moving so we made out pretty good. Some flooding but thats about it.My rain gauge shows 8.75 inches of rain since Wednesday.

GreenCross4Safety · September 27, 2024 at 8:57 am

Given how the left operates, that supposition works. Politicize everything. Really appreciate your site.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.