I am in favor of the death penalty in theory, but after seeing the innocence project and the Duke Lacrosse case, I am of the opinion that our legal system is too corrupt to ensure that we are not executing the innocent. I first made this post 13 years ago:
Maurice Patterson was convicted of murder in 2002 for a fight where the victim was stabbed 14 times. Three people witnessed the fight, fleetingly and in the dark, and a fourth witness claimed to have seen a man with blood on his hand hiding from the police. All four witnesses identified Maurice Patterson in a live lineup weeks after the attack,
but they only testified regarding these identifications after being threatened with Contempt of Court.
A bloody knife was found near the scene and sent to Orchid Cellmark for DNA testing. Test results excluded Patterson, indicating a mixture of the victim’s profile and an unknown profile. Comparison to the State CODIS DNA database revealed that the unknown profile belonged to a drug addict with a history of violence. Though the State Police Forensic Science Center had been notified that the sample included the victim’s blood, this information was never directly communicated to the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office. Prosecutors continued with the case against Patterson despite the exculpatory results.
Robert Wilcoxson and Kenneth Kagonyera served almost 10 years in North Carolina prisons for a murder they didn’t commit before a three-judge panel overturned their convictions on September 22, 2011, based on DNA evidence proving innocence.
In this case, a man was killed during a home invasion, and police managed to secure confessions from the two defendants. Three bandanas and two pairs of gloves were located on the side of the road near the Bowman residence and were collected by deputies as evidence in the case. The bandanas and gloves found near the crime scene
were submitted for pre-trial DNA testing. Results excluded all six co-defendants, however this information was never turned over to Kagonyera or Wilcoxson’s attorneys.
There was the Duke Lacrosse case, where a woman accused a Lacrosse team of gang rape. Dennis Nifong, the state prosecutor, had DNA test results in his possession that showed the team was innocent. He didn’t disclose the existence of this evidence to the defense team.
Sure, we have DNA and such, but when the system is so corrupt that exculpatory evidence is “lost” or buried, we are executing the innocent. Knowingly allowing a flawed and corrupt system to kill people makes our entire society guilty of murder. I just can’t support giving the government the power to decide who lives and who dies. Even if the law were to be changed to punish crooked prosecutors, it will never be used. For that reason, I just can’t get behind the death penalty.
11 Comments
@HomeInSC · July 28, 2025 at 5:58 am
Bullseye.
Noway2 · July 28, 2025 at 7:03 am
I would rather be dead than spend one day in prison, innocent or guilty.
For that reason, not that I ever expect it to happen, but should it, I would never submit to the cops. The only question would be how many of them are going to hell with me.
JaimeInTexas · July 28, 2025 at 7:24 am
I reached the same conclusion when the Houston Crime Lab got caught fabricating results.
Search: houston dry labbing
Divemedic · July 28, 2025 at 8:02 am
It wasn’t just small time. The FBI crime lab faked evidence in cases for DECADES, including the OJ Simpson case and the OKC bombing.
Biggun · July 30, 2025 at 9:07 pm
I worked for the Durham Police Department during the Duke Lacrosse saga and knew all the prosecution side including that asshole Mike Nifong.
You are not wrong at all with your analysis.
If those boys were not from rich families, they would have been railroaded right into prison.
Rick T · July 28, 2025 at 9:41 am
And that is why the parties that fabricated, manipulated, or concealed evidence should be subject to the same penalties as the accused in the case. Mike Nifong and the woman who lied to start the Duke Lacrosse case off should both still be in jail.
Divemedic · July 28, 2025 at 10:20 am
yeah, like that will ever happen. Most legislators are lawyers. Do you think that they will vote to pass laws that hurt other lawyers? Fat chance.
Until that day comes, I will continue to oppose the death penalty.
McChuck · July 28, 2025 at 9:53 am
I’m all for the death penalty for crooked DA’s who fabricate evidence or hide exculpatory evidence.
Divemedic · July 28, 2025 at 10:21 am
Once that law is passed and actually enforced, I will change my stance. Until then, I remain opposed to the death penalty.
Anonymous · July 28, 2025 at 10:49 pm
Agreed.
Why would you give life or death decisions to the same people who brought you the DMV?
Having said that, I am certain that there are many perps who deserve death, and many vigilantes who I would look the other way on if they were accused.
TRX · July 29, 2025 at 8:34 pm
> Prosecutors continued with the case against Patterson despite the exculpatory results.
—
Yeah. That seems to happen an awful lot.
I’d like to see those prosecutors serve the sentences of the guys they railroaded into prison.
Comments are closed.