I know this story is 7 years old, but it displays an important point. A 17 year old was burglarizing a woman’s house and set off her burglar alarm, which alerted the 54 year old homeowner of the break in. She called police while rushing home, and arrived before the police to find the burglar climbing out of a window. She confronted him, he attacked her, she shot and killed him. Police ruled that the shooting was self defense. I won’t comment on the details or legality of the shooting, as there just aren’t enough facts in this article to say either way. (Although I think it is important to note that I can’t find where charges were ever filed.) What I want to concentrate on is what the man’s mother had to say:
“You have to look at it from every child’s point of view that was raised in the hood,” said Harris. “You have to understand… how he gonna get his money to have clothes to go to school? You have to look at it from his point-of-view.”
This is why your average negro isn’t capable of living in a high trust society. They look at things through what THEY want, and have no capacity for considering the needs or property of others. If they want something, they take it, property rights of other people be damned.
Black woman running her mouth. Guy is tired of hearing it, tells her to shut up. She calls him a cracker then says “back up off me, I got a gun.”
Black woman throws coffee in White man's face.
She's being rude and loud over a French vanilla shot, White man experiencing black fatigue told her to shut up. She calls him a crakkker, assaults him, threatens to shoot him, and throws coffee in his face. pic.twitter.com/Ob72AF2xm1
I might even be tempted to draw on her black ass as soon as she said she had a gun. What she just did is a hate crime, and it’s also a forcible felony called “aggravated assault.” I wonder what state this was in…
784.011 Assault.— (1) An “assault” is an intentional, unlawful threat by word or act to do violence to the person of another, coupled with an apparent ability to do so, and doing some act which creates a well-founded fear in such other person that such violence is imminent.
784.021 Aggravated assault.— (1) An “aggravated assault” is an assault:
(a) With a deadly weapon without intent to kill
Then the store owner wouldn’t call the cops. I guess he is afraid of she-boons
New Mexico has just passed a law that allows non-citizen immigrants to be police officers. In 2024 alone, the Biden administration issued over two million new work permits to non-citizens — many of them illegal immigrants. Federal law prohibits illegal aliens from possessing firearms, which law enforcement officer must carry.
Now we have to consider that the people who will be enforcing the laws against YOU are themselves criminals who are flouting the law.
A few times in the past, I have told you that more and more states and localities are hiring immigrants to be police officers, and in some cases they are hiring illegal immigrants. This is right out of the CIA insurgency manual, which has been followed by the left since at least 2019. The plan is to make people distrust the government so that they can replace it with their own, alternative, government. You know, the alternative that they have created.
Keep in mind that the Governor of New Mexico, Grisham, previously suspended Second Amendment rights in the state. In 2023, she issued an executive order banning citizens from carrying guns in Albuquerque. The executive order expired in 2024, but picture a person here in violation of the law, carrying a gun in violation of the law, telling you that you are under arrest for having a gun because some politician said so.
Each of us as Americans will have to decide at what point we have been overrun. At what point do we consider a group of uniformed, armed, illegal invaders to be an occupying army? When does the real resistance begin?
Trust me, my resistance won’t consist of sitting in the road blocking traffic or gluing my hand to a painting.
“If a vehicle is simply stolen, there’s no force, violence or gun involved, police are not allowed to chase stolen cars. Period,” said O’Hara, “The police department’s policy does not allow for a vehicle pursuit simply because the car is stolen. The car would have to have been taken by force, some sort of violence, there would have to be a gun involved or some other serious crime. If an individual is trying to just bait the officer into a pursuit, it’s not going to get safer once this, once the cop starts chasing them… The cops did their job. They had zero discretion in that case,” he continued. “It is just not worth the risk of endangering everyone’s lives, especially if, at the end result, even if no one’s hurt, we arrest a couple juveniles, we bring them downtown, and they’re immediately released. It is completely senseless.”
In the meantime, local residents and business owners voice complaint after complaint that the police do nothing. If the cops aren’t going to even try to catch criminals, there is no reason to have cops. This is a case for an immediate 50% cut to the police budget, to correspond with a matching tax cut for the residents of the city.
In the meantime, remove the plates from your car and simply refuse to pull over for any and all traffic stops. They can’t chase you. Period.
I have posted about stupid pranks that the current generation is playing, thinking that placing people in fear for their lives to get views of their social media is funny. Two years ago, it was staging a scene where unsuspecting people came upon what looked like a person dressed as a clown that had just murdered someone then began chasing the prank victim.
Let me show you an example of the current trend in these so-called prank videos:
This idiot approaches people saying, “I am gonna burn your car up, bro” before pouring a liquid from a gas can onto the hood while holding a lighter, then compounding it by chasing the victim with the gas can and lighter.
I am going to shoot your ass just as quickly as I can clear leather. Then I am going to keep shooting you until you fall to the ground, and I am going to walk away without being convicted of a crime, AND I am going to be paid for my troubles. Let me explain:
It doesn’t matter that the liquid is not a flammable one, just like it doesn’t matter if a person robs you with a toy gun. What matters is the person defending themselves reasonably believes that the threat is a real one. The moron clearly indicated that it was his intent to set my car, and possibly me, on fire before pouring what appears to be a flammable liquid on my car. It’s clearly his intent to make the person being “pranked” to believe they are imminently going to be the victim of arson. After all, if that belief didn’t exist, the prank wouldn’t work as a prank. Therefore, it is reasonable for a person to believe that an arson is imminent.
(1) Any person who willfully and unlawfully, or while in the commission of any felony, by fire or explosion, damages or causes to be damaged:
(a) Any dwelling, whether occupied or not, or its contents;
<snip irrelevant legalese>
(3) As used in this chapter, “structure” means any building of any kind, any enclosed area with a roof over it, any real property and appurtenances thereto, any tent or other portable building, and any vehicle, vessel, watercraft, or aircraft.
Not only that, but arson is also a forcible felony. In Florida, I can use deadly force to stop the imminent commission of a forcible felony. I could even argue that pouring a flammable liquid on a vehicle where I am in close proximity is a deadly threat upon my person. It doesn’t even have to be my car. It can be a car that I am standing close to. That isn’t even considering that this rocket scientist was chasing people with the gas can and lighter in his hand.
(2) A person is justified in using or threatening to use deadly force if he or she reasonably believes that using or threatening to use such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the imminent commission of a forcible felony. A person who uses or threatens to use deadly force in accordance with this subsection does not have a duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground if the person using or threatening to use the deadly force is not engaged in a criminal activity and is in a place where he or she has a right to be.
It isn’t just vehicles. Now they have progressed to pouring a liquid from a gas can onto people.
The morons even brag about how “epic” it is that so many people were fooled.
After I shoot and kill you in self defense, every person involved in this production is now guilty of felony murder. They are also liable to me when I sue everyone involved in this so-called prank for the “emotional trauma” and PTSD I now have experienced because I had to shoot someone.
and yeah, I am going to include Youtube in the lawsuit because they allow these videos to be monetized.
You will note that the person posting the video (and the one filming) believe that the cops were wrong in “attacking” the innocent children. If you listen closely to the video, you hear the male cop tell them that they have already been asked to leave the property. One of the girls tells him to fuck off. He then tells her that she is going to be arrested, to which she replies, “No, I am not.” Some more words are exchanged, and the cops move to take one of them into custody, presumably for trespassing.
The other girls go into attack mode, with at least one of them punching the male cop in the face.
I don’t have a problem with the police actions here. If they were indeed attempting to have the girls leave because they were trespassing, the cops were not being the bad guys here. The women attacked two cops, they were obstructing the cops, and they are rightfully going to jail.
In this case, we have black criminals doing what black criminals do. Since they are adults (again, listening to the audio) they are going down for battery on a LEO. In most places, that’s a serious crime, but this is California, so I am not sure.
After spending a couple of days talking about how I try to show people compassion, some idiots go and validate a stereotype and test my empathy. Of course I can’t be empathic to a guy and his family when they stab someone for telling him he was in the wrong seat, but this gets even worse.
The kid and his family used this as a fundraising opportunity and raised over $400k from gullible morons who hate white people. They also got a racist black judge to agree with them, and lowered the murderer’s bond from $1 million down to $250k. So the father decided to quit his job and use the money was a windfall and have decided to spend it on a new house. He is claiming that the case has caused the family to need a new house because of racist threats.
George Zimmerman and Kyle Rittenhouse would like to comment on this.
The trial hasn’t even started yet, and they are back to not having a pot to piss in, but at least they now own a window to throw it out of. If I were the dead victim’s family, I would already be filing a wrongful death lawsuit and taking that shit.
Black dude died in the Bahamas after spitting at someone. The parents claim he was beaten to death. I don’t know why the parents are upset. The new rule is that you can stab someone in the chest if they touch you or your stuff.
