Two people were killed when a shooting happened in Las Vegas last night, right in front of the Bellagio Fountains. It appears to have been one Social Media “influencer”, who runs a channel called the Sin City Family Channel:
Got into an altercation with another influencer, pulled a gun and fired shots. One of the victims is reported to be this “influencer”:
If blacks don’t want to be stereotyped, they should stop acting in a stereotypical manner. Contrast that with the behavior of the white guy with his arm around his girl to the left of the screen. As soon as he hears shots, he takes her down to the ground and shields her with his body.
Rumor has it that the fight was caused because the two channels were engaged in reporting each other in an attempt to get the other channel enough strikes to be shut down by Youtube. The day before, the shooter had posted to social media that he was going to track down his rival.
18 Comments
Elrod · June 9, 2025 at 6:40 am
It’s long been “urban ROE” that the appearance of a group young black males is cause for immediately being elsewhere; it appears that the proper group size for such action is now approaching anything >0.
Noway2 · June 9, 2025 at 6:54 am
As a matter of courtesy, I often avoid linking to other sites in blogs. Yesterday I read a very good article about “black fatigue” discussing how it is simply impossible for whites to coexist with blacks. As a whole, they are not suited towards civil society. While some of them may be better than the average and be capable of it, they are treated as traitors to their kind for doing so. Back in the 50s when things were a lot more segregated, there was far less crime, fewer unwed mothers, etc. All of the policies to integrate them have just made things worse.
Skeptic · June 9, 2025 at 7:36 am
Culture is downstream from genetics.
Joe Blow · June 9, 2025 at 8:11 am
They are fundamentally incompatible with Western society. Between the impulse control issues and a general problem handling ‘respect’ issues as adults, their tendency to solve every problem with a violent reaction is akin to taking a trip to the monkey house.
Just LOOK at the morphological differences for Christ’ssake?!?! You’re going to tell me we’re the same species? Are you out of your freaking mind?!?!? Look, I’m not suggesting anything beyond open your fucking eyes and LOOK at all the different races, and tell me again with a straight face we’re all the same species. I don’t even have to get to statistics, use your damned eyes. We are NOT the same. It’s no surprise we don’t get along. Only man is stupid enough to think he can over-ride the laws of nature. Animal species do not cohabitate without reason, for a reason! We even invented special words to describe the various ways these relationships play out. Mutually beneficial relationships are considered ‘symbiotic’, the other end of the spectrum is considered ‘parasitic’…. and I’ll just leave that hanging right there.
Divemedic · June 9, 2025 at 9:04 am
A species is defined as the largest group of organisms in which any two individuals of the appropriate sexes or mating types can produce fertile offspring, typically by sexual reproduction.
Since all races are capable of producing fertile offspring when interbreeding, they are biologicially the same species. I would be willing to go with subspecies, even though biologists have shied away from that for political reasons.
wojtek · June 9, 2025 at 12:33 pm
Ecotype
Divemedic · June 9, 2025 at 2:15 pm
An ecotype is a form of subspecies.
wojtek · June 9, 2025 at 4:25 pm
To a degree yes, but nowadays the concept of an ecotype is much more widely accepted than the concept of race 🙂 Plus, for those who consider race in taxonomy, they would typically put it below subspecies.
However, in this specific case, also because nobody would put the Hispanic shooter and his Black victim into the same race or even subspecies. But I can make an argument that they belong to the same ecotype 😉
Divemedic · June 9, 2025 at 7:41 pm
That’s my point. Saying that there aren’t subspecies is more a political than a scientific argument, akin to saying there are more than 2 genders.
wojtek · June 10, 2025 at 10:47 am
I think that the main issue here is that to a biologist not every subset of a species is considered subspecies. Whereas a nonspecialist like say me colloquially would use the phrase subspecies to denote any smaller subset of the larger set. But generally I have to agree with biologists here – trying to develop a proper nomenclature and rules in a field like biology is not easy, but once you decide what criteria you want to use, it can become sort of a proper science.
There is this old joke I once heard about various sciences. It goes something like this:
Biologists think they are proper scientists.
Chemists laugh at this claim – they know that biology is more about collection and labeling than actual science. Chemistry is a proper science.
Physicists laugh at the chemists’ claim. They know it is more about experimentation and blind trial and error than actual rigorous science. Physics is a proper science.
Mathematicians laugh at the physicists’ claim. They know that it is about making some unjustified assumptions and guessing the answers, more than about rigorously deriving them from theory. Mathematics is a proper science.
Logicians laugh at the mathematicians’ statement. They know all the axioms mathematicians are assuming. Logic is a proper science.
Even biologists laugh at logicians.
The point is that we cannot expect rules of logic to perfectly apply to say natural sciences. But biologists still should try their best. So modern taxonomy is trying. Especially because the old taxonomy was known to be really wrong many times. Hence they have certain criteria that help them build the organization (taxonomy) of the living organisms, from kingdoms down to species, or subspecies or even races. And simply some groupings that seem natural to us do not sufficiently differ within their criteria. That’s why some people came up with different criteria which lead to notions like say an ecotype.
And we can quarrel about the criteria they use, but we can’t choose these criteria for them.
So I say let them have it. Esp that ecotype really fits much better here 🙂
frmr180A · June 9, 2025 at 10:33 am
Cultures fail – history is littered with their hulks and ruins.
Some fail and leave little to no trace that they ever existed.
Some drag other cultures down with them as they go.
Grumpy51 · June 9, 2025 at 11:27 am
Think of the domesticated dog – Canis lupus familiaris . Now look at all the various breeds. A Chihuahua is from the same basic species as a Great Dane.
I look at race as being essentially the same. I am open to a correction of my viewpoint.
Divemedic · June 9, 2025 at 2:14 pm
Biologically, a species can’t produce viable offspring with members of another species. That’s why there are different breeds of dog.
That would make races like dog breeds.
wojtek · June 10, 2025 at 4:41 pm
Indeed, Chihuahua is from the same species as a Great Dane. But it is not a species of dogs – all dogs (Canis familiaris) form a subspecies of wolves (Canis lupus). So as the Host wrote below, you have here two dog breeds, which interestingly in many languages other than English are effectively called “dog races”: race de chiens, Hunderasse, raza de perro, rasa psów, razza di cane, etc. In each of these languages it is exactly the same word that is used when referring to human races.
Of the languages I know at least a tiny little bit, only Russian and English talk about a dog “breed” (rus: poroda).
Divemedic · June 10, 2025 at 11:24 pm
To form a new species, a portion of a current species has to form a colony that is prevented from interbreeding with other colonies by some sort of barrier. Animals isolated by climate, geographical location, certain behaviors, or some other barrier that prevents them from interbreeding with other colonies of the same species will eventually experience genetic drift, becoming more different from others of their species until they are no longer capable of forming viable offspring. It is that point where a new species is born.
A breed (or subspecies) can even do this from something as simple as mating behaviors. For example, a Great Dane will have great difficulty in mating and creating offspring with a Chihuahua. Given enough time, the two breeds will be genetically incapable of producing viable offspring, and one or both of them will become a second species.
The same would have happened with humans, if humans hadn’t invented intercontinental travel when they did.
wojtek · June 11, 2025 at 3:20 pm
That’s because the problem with properly defining species is much more difficult and the interbreeding definition is imperfect (there are counterexamples). One can easily imagine both chihuahuas and great danes to mate with dogs of intermediate sizes, with offspring which can later mate in the next stage. So they still would be considered the same species. It’d take some drastic genetic mutations to change that.
SoCoRuss · June 9, 2025 at 12:30 pm
All this is to be expected. These savages have been taught NOTHING is THEIR fault, its all Whiteys fault and they wont be held accountable.
So that creates a perfect environment for violence, it always starts with threats and if you don’t cower in fear then the violence comes.
Seamrog · June 9, 2025 at 9:08 pm
If you look at the very end of the video, there is a man shielding a woman with his body.
Comments are closed.