The Florida house of representatives approved a ballot measure for this year’s election. The proposal would allow voters to approve an elimination of all non-school property taxes for homestead property. Sixty percent of those voting would need to approve it, then it would become part of the state Constitution. This proposal still needs to be approved by the state Senate in order to make it on the ballot, and it will have a much harder battle there, because the Democrats are absolutely opposed to it.
You will recall from my post of a couple of years ago:
In Florida, the tax assessor decides what the “fair market value” of your house is. The taxable value is then calculated by taking the market value and subtracting your homestead exemption. In order to have a homestead exemption, the owner of the property must live there as their primary residence. In other words, commercial and rental property doesn’t get a homestead exemption. The taxable value is then subject to being taxed. If you want more detail on how all of this works, click on this link to my previous post.
There are also numerous carve-outs for various groups.
- The homestead exemption is $25,000 on the first $50k of value, then another $25,000 for the next $50k of value, but that second $25k is only for non-school taxes.
- Additional exemption for residents 65 or older who make less than $38,686 per year
- Total exemption for totally and permanently disabled veterans, surviving spouses, or first responders.
- No property taxes for active-duty personnel deployed outside the U.S.
The result of all of this is many people already don’t pay taxes. In my town, there are 1,000 homes total. Two neighborhoods were recently built in the town- my own, and one other. Those two communities have 200 homes in them, so 20% of the town’s homes. Those homes pay more than 50% of the town’s taxes. Many homes in the town, including those of three of the five city commissioners, pay no taxes at all.
As a result, taxes are very tilted. Renters pay more than owners (because landlords don’t get tax exemptions). Those who have lived in their homes for a long time don’t pay any (or very little) in taxes.
The left is pissed about this. They are all singing the same song- claiming that this is a tax break for so-called “boomers” because GenZ doesn’t own houses. Isn’t it odd that the left constantly wants corporations to pay taxes, but they finally understand that companies don’t pay taxes- instead, they treat taxes like any other expense, and pass those expenses on to the consumer.
The left claims that property taxes are essential for things like police and fire, but ignore that overall, ad valorum taxes are only 18% of local tax revenues. Still they claim the following would be affected, but are lying:
- Law enforcement
- Social services
- Parks
- Environmental programs
- Fire districts
- Emergency medical services
- Schools
- Roads
Law enforcement, fire, EMS, and police are specifically mentioned in the law and will have required funding. School taxes are exempt. What this leaves is Social services (giveaways), Parks and environmental programs (luxury items), and roads (already funded by gasoline taxes and tolls). What the left is upset about is the funding for things like learing centers and other graft that permits them to hand out money to their wealthy well connected patrons.
The Senate session ends March 13. The odds that this gets passed before then are long. It probably won’t happen.
6 Comments
Phil B · February 23, 2026 at 10:59 am
“(The) following would be affected, Law enforcement, Social services, Parks, Environmental programs, Fire districts, Emergency medical services, Schools, Roads”
Of course they will be affected. They will make sure that they will by withholding funding and closing the facilities to maximise the inconvenience and enjoyment of the tax payers, just like O’bummer did with the National Parks etc. to force the funding to be approved when he was in power.
I’d add Public libraries, swimming pools and other publicly owned facilities.
Divemedic · February 23, 2026 at 1:25 pm
TBH, Public Libraries are no longer needed, an artifact of technologies that have long since been made obsolete.
Michael · February 23, 2026 at 4:22 pm
I respectfully disagree Divemedic.
First not everybody has internet. Public libraries help there both with access and paper books.
As I’ve seen data changed online from week to week PAPER Books are both the backup and restore “disk” for America.
But then again I go to library meetings and organize folks to read the CRAP they try to implant there and have seen more than a few librarians fired.
I also buy old books and store them away. And pray it doesn’t get that bad that we need them to reboot society. I wonder how many who read here have a paper copy of the Constitution and such.
Divemedic · February 23, 2026 at 5:51 pm
I just think libraries are a luxury that no longer need to be funded at taxpayer expense.
C · February 24, 2026 at 1:50 pm
I’m starting to agree with you given the literature my local library curates. The look of pure disgust on the staff members faces when you dare ask for any material catering to men. I’d wager 80% of the materials are there to cater to middle aged dissatisfied house wives.
I’m currently hoarding old books on science, technology, and skilled trades. The pre-90s stuff is way different (and better) than the current stuff.
ghostsniper · February 23, 2026 at 12:36 pm
Public Schools:
You attend them for 12 years, then you pay for them for the rest of your life.
A reverse pyramid scheme.
We homeschooled our son out of our own pocket and payed for the public schools too.
What a country.
Comments are closed.