President Donald Trump has activated hundreds of Texas National Guard troops and federalized 300 Illinois National Guard troops for duty in Illinois despite the governor’s objections. The left is bitching because they have suddenly rediscovered states’ rights.
Once again, they are deploying our troops into a combat zone with no strategy, no clear definition of what a victory would look like, and worse yet no exit plan. All to yet again just to prop up another failed regime that will never become a true democracy…………
7 Comments
None Other · October 7, 2025 at 8:45 am
Funny how they don’t want troops in their states now, but during Biden’s fake inauguration, there were thousands in DC, and that was ok with these fuckers.
mike fink · October 7, 2025 at 9:49 am
I called the fenced in and troop filled capital city “Fort Pelosi” at the time. They also like to call the J6 fedsurrection panty raid an “insurrection” too and clutch at their pearls at the horror, though their leaders are on record refusing DC National Guard support. Then there was that little covid era use of troops in the streets to keep people confined to their homes. If I recall correctly it was tampon Timmy Walz in Minnesota and they fired Paintball/pepper spray rounds at people looking out of their own front doorways at a real fascist spectacle.
Honk Honk · October 7, 2025 at 9:21 am
Comrade Kommissar Pritzker was fearful that the buffets would be consumed and he wouldn’t get any?
It will be glorious when Portland comrades hear please face wall now comrade from fellow travelers.
Plague Monk · October 7, 2025 at 10:31 am
My concern on this subject is POSSIBLE violation of the Posse Commitus Act. I’m not a lawyer,, nor a Constitutional scholar, so I’m not sure.
Divemedic · October 7, 2025 at 12:02 pm
The Posse Comitatus Act, specifically permits the President to use federal troops to “Suppress insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combinations, or conspiracies” when state authorities are unable or unwilling to enforce the law. The act, 0 U.S. Code §§ 251–255, says this:
§ 252 – When Laws Are Being Obstructed (Law Enforcement Clause) Use allowed when: “Unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States” make it impracticable to enforce U.S. law through regular judicial proceedings.
§ 253 – To Protect Civil Rights (Civil Rights Clause) Use allowed when: Insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy in a state: Deprives people of constitutional rights, and the state is unable or unwilling to protect those rights.
Before invoking the Act, the President must: Issue a public proclamation ordering the insurgents to disperse (called the “proclamation to disperse” requirement under § 254).
Use the military only as a last resort when other means have failed or are impractical.
The act does not allow indefinite military rule or the use of military force to suppress peaceful protests.
It must be tied to specific threats to law enforcement or constitutional rights.
mike fink · October 7, 2025 at 1:05 pm
The entire Dept of the Navy, to include the USMC is exempt from PC. This little loophole was used to get SEAL Team 6 some trigger time in the 1993 Waco takedown without breaking the law.
gb · October 7, 2025 at 1:16 pm
The saddest part of all this is how true your last paragraph reads.