Why does the EU/UK need the US to be involved in the Ukraine affair? All you have to do is look at the numbers.
- The EU has a population that is 50% larger than the US- 518 million, compared to our 340 million. (UK 68 million, EU 450 million).
- The GDP of the UK/EU is $20.5 Trillion, compared to the US $27.2 Trillion.
- The UK/EU spends $394 Billion (UK $68.3 Billion, EU $326 Billion) on defense. That is 1.9% of its GDP.
- The UK/EU spends $1.2 trillion on medical care and $4.5 trillion on welfare benefits. That’s a total of $5.7 trillion, or more than a quarter of their GDP. That’s why they can’t afford a military, but that’s OK, the US will supply that, am I right?
- The US spends $1 trillion on defense, or 3.7% of its GDP, with a fifth of that going to support the defense of Europe. A third of the money spent on Europe’s defense comes from the US, with the other 2/3s coming from the 32 countries of Europe.
While all of this is going on, while Europe is demanding that we the United States do something to stop Russia, they are busy buying Russian oil. So much oil that the Russians have received more European money over the past three years than has Ukraine.
Europe has been spending their money on free healthcare, vacations, and baubles because they can afford to. The US is taking care of the defense budget. That’s what Trump has been complaining about- the nations of Europe are, like teenagers, spending all of their money on music and fast food because the US is acting like parents, and taking care of the groceries and home expenses.
Now tell me why American money needs to go to Europe, why Americans have to enter a war and die, all so Europe can continue partying like it’s a Frat party funded by Europe and the US.
It’s time for that to end. There is no reason why the nations of Europe can’t take care of Russia. The US has a bigger problem to deal with- China. The thing is, what is going to be needed to deal with the Chinese threat isn’t going to be the same as needed for Russia.
Russia only has 8 surface warships in service that are less than 25 years old and larger than 1,000 tons, and they are all Frigates. The remainder of their surface Navy is more than 25 years old, in drydock, or a Corvette (similar to a Coast Guard cutter).
They have one nuclear attack submarine that was built this century, the rest are cold war relics. The only attack submarines they have that are less than 25 years old are diesels.
That’s OK for shallow water operations, but they are no longer a blue water navy. They can’t protect SLOCs, nor can they project power. The Russian navy is not really a force projecting service any longer.
I am not saying that the US has no business interests in Europe, because that is false. The US has business interests in every nation in the world. That isn’t the same thing as a vital national interest. Our military doesn’t exist to make sure that no business venture in the world has risks. No American should die just so some businessman somewhere doesn’t lose money. The US military isn’t here to provide a risk free business environment for all of the nations of the earth.
It’s time that we stop being Uncle Sugar, the World Police, and stop borrowing money that we don’t have to provide security to Europe while they enjoy all of the fruits of our labor, our blood, and our treasure.
38 Comments
Bigus Macus · March 5, 2025 at 7:06 am
American first, that should never be questioned.
J J · March 5, 2025 at 8:34 am
The government of US can no longer afford to be the world’s policeman, sticking its nose into every nation’s conflicts as long as the war mongers can utter some ridiculous words about US interests and national security.
The US intervention everywhere factions have had the DOD/CIA invade just as many countries as Russia has. I think the cover has worn thin for US Gov’s international meddling while whining about other countries who are doing the same things in their own interests and national security.
Tree Mike · March 5, 2025 at 11:36 pm
USA INC. has invaded MANY more countries than USSR/Russia.
Tom235 · March 5, 2025 at 8:46 am
Why can’t Europe buy our “stuff” instead of us giving it to them? Cash, not “trade deals”. No more NATO – its time has passed. No more UN – a forum supported by us to allow the world to hate us on our own soil.
@HomeInSC · March 5, 2025 at 9:51 am
Just my opinions…
We don’t need to worry about Russian expansionism *at this time*. Putin’s primary concern seems to be NATO encirclement and the proximity of the Ukraine to Moscow. Just look at a map of NATO countries.
I am sick and tired of whining Europeans who want Big Daddy USA cuddle them. No more money, no more lives for woke pissants who seem hell-bent on escalation.
Trump is right to try and insert the US between Russia and the EU in an economic instead of military way. Glenn Beck thinks Trump will do minerals deals in Ukraine and in occupied Ukraine. Economic benefits shared instead of a winner take all outcome. The US occupying, without troops, what would basically be a DMZ could work. The implied threat of US force could be enough to keep the peace, especially if Trump cuts the waste and increases the effectiveness of the US military. As much as I would like to see the US just walk away from the whole mess, I think the Euroweenies would do something monumentally stupid in the vacuum we would create.
Side note: I like Orban in Hungary. We should support him economically.
It looks like Trump suspending all arms and money to the Ukraine got that dufus Zelenskyy’s attention. Time to get Europe’s attention. Start rapid decomissioning of US bases in Europe. Bring our troops home, let them defend the US borders. Keep a few strategic bases. NATO is looking like as much of a problem as it is a solution. Time to either restructure it or get out. That should bring the EU $ addicts to heel.
Side note: WTF is Turkiye doing in NATO? We did the right thing at the Seige of Vienna. Seems we forgot what Islam is all about.
Oh, and let’s nuke the WEF/Davis crowd from orbit: it’s the only way to be sure.
Divemedic · March 5, 2025 at 10:09 am
I think we are on the same page.
I also don’t understand why we still store nuclear weapons in Turkey.
wojtek · March 5, 2025 at 11:31 am
“I also don’t understand why we still store nuclear weapons in Turkey.”
B/c it is very close to Iran. Plus in case of anything happening it would almost certainly divert some of Iran’s “reaction” towards Turkey. Win-win.
Divemedic · March 5, 2025 at 11:34 am
That is ridiculous. There are no US aircraft on that base that are capable of delivering those weapons. They are just sitting there in storage.
The US base at Diego Garcia would suffice for that.
@HomeInSC · March 5, 2025 at 12:35 pm
Let’s hope the nuke storage in 🦃 is phony decoys. Otherwise it makes absolutely zero sense. Oh, and F Erdogan and his caliphate.
Divemedic · March 5, 2025 at 3:36 pm
Post coming soon on Turkey nukes.
wojtek · March 5, 2025 at 1:21 pm
Cost of maintaining those nukes there is relatively low compared to the cost of maintaining the aircraft there. That aircraft can come in at any moment from anywhere, be loaded in no time and leave, never returning again. Plus Seychelles are much further away from both Iran and Russia than Turkey is. So they play a different role. Plus they are actually signatories of the TPNW. Curious what implications it will have now.
And if you ask me why can’t you keep these nukes in Italy instead, together with the airplanes, then the answer is that Italians don’t want to be the target of Iranian (or anyone else’s) retribution in case the US decides to use them, and so over the years they negotiated a very significant decrease in the number of bombs stored in Italy. And not many other countries want them. That’s why these nukes haven’t been moved from Turkey.
Divemedic · March 5, 2025 at 3:31 pm
If you are going to fly aircraft in to fly a nuclear mission, the same aircraft dropping the nukes can already be armed with them. Why fly an unarmed aircraft from, say Germany or the UK, then arm it with a nuke on the ground in Turkey, only to have them drop the nuke in Iran? Why not simply arm it in Germany before flying directly to Iran to drop it?
That’s just nonsense.
wojtek · March 5, 2025 at 3:55 pm
Check the data how many bombs are actually in the nuclear sharing program right now. You’ll see why. So, removing them from Turkey means cutting the size of the whole program by 20%. Looks like your leaders think it’s too much. It does sound like it too.
On top of that not every country will immediately agree to every use of the bombs in their portion of the sharing program. It’s called sharing for a reason. In this regard, I don’t think the same standards would be applied to Turkey as to Germany.
Divemedic · March 5, 2025 at 5:23 pm
Don’t care. There is no reason for nukes to be in Turkey. To be honest, I don’t care what anyone who isn’t a US citizen thinks about that, either. You don’t get anymore of a say than I do on what Poland does with their country.
wojtek · March 5, 2025 at 6:46 pm
I don’t think you know what I think. What I told you is the reasons why your government keeps your nukes in Turkey. So you don’t like the reality. Must be too bad for reality.
Robert · March 5, 2025 at 2:52 pm
I would hope that we removed all nuclear weapons from Turkey years ago. It is obvious that we should not have any such weapons there right now.
But I don’t see any mention of current inventory locations in the “Where are they now?” weekly newsletter. Come to think of it, I haven’t seen the newsletter either.
JimmyPx · March 5, 2025 at 10:46 am
Divemedic, you are spot on. The problem is that NATO should have been ended over 30 years ago with the end of the Cold War. It served its purpose and Russia has no desire to conquer Europe.
But the Neocons and people making money via the military industrial complex NEED a boogeyman to justify blowing trillions a year on defense.
First it was the “War on Terror” and Russia wasn’t seen as a threat and was the 8 in the G8.
Then the “War on Terror” was ending and they needed the boogeyman…thus during the Obama Administration they cranked Russophobia WAAAY up and here we are. It was so bad last year that our State Department hadn’t spoken to the Russians in 3 years and we were on the verge of WWIII !!
The idiots in charge during the Biden admin did NOT understand that the Russians do NOT bluff. If Putin and Lavrov say something they MEAN it and will do what they say.
The sad part is that since the fall of the Soviet Union, Russia should be our friend. They have MASSIVE natural resources that they need help developing. Our country could make a fortune doing that and if it were possible, shift many of the defense contractors from making weapons to peaceful products.
Southernbore · March 5, 2025 at 11:06 am
DM this is right to the point, I would add Canada to the EU whiners. Sick to death hearing about Canada’s “free” health care.
wojtek · March 5, 2025 at 11:25 am
Interesting. As in the saying: beware of what you pray for because God might actually listen.
Now, just to make it clear: the current war in Europe is a perfect example of what I consider an unnecessary war. And I really wish it didn’t happen. If Kamala said 3 years ago in Munich that Ukraine won’t join NATO, I am quite certain we wouldn’t have any of it. But putting that aside, there is no need to keep this war going. It achieved its main goals from the US perspective: Russia is significantly weakened, its ability to project force far beyond their borders is significantly diminished, and they became technologically dependent on China (which is never a good sign).
At the same time, no amount of monetary help to Ukraine will achieve anything on the battlefield. I mean they may retake a few small towns, but Crimea and Donbas? No.
So it is high time to end that war. No further American “financial” investment will yield anything of value: Russia won’t collapse, Putin won’t be assassinated (at least not by any of his disappointed followers), China won’t become poorer.
However, US involvement in Europe (as well as in the rest of the World) is not merely a cost to the US. It is also a benefit. Of course not for the proverbial US taxpayers. Well, not for all of them 🙂
One of the victims of a complete US withdrawal from Europe might be the status of USD as a major reserve currency. Your statistics above are actually underestimating the economical strength of Europe. That 20.5T figure looks like EU’s nominal GDP, excluding UK. Together this should be about 25.0T. And again – it is in nominal terms, which favor USD because of B-W. In PPP EU/UK have GDP probably around 32-33T. So in per capita terms still lower than US, but not by much.
Long story short, economically Europe is larger than the US and larger could also mean stronger if it really were a single entity. The only thing Europe does not have is abundant natural resources. This is what Russia was for. Of course in 2014 Nuland&Co decided to end that. It is a slow process, as the data on oil and gas imports shows. (In fact, one should also look at a sudden jump in exports of Central Asia “-stans” since 2021. E.g., Kazakhstan became an exporter of wood 🙂 )
So from the US perspective, Ukraine war served more than 1 goal. It was not only weakening Ruskies, but it was also cutting Europe from its major raw materials supplier. Win-win, right?
But what if US decides to completely exit Europe? Short term of course it is going to be a crisis. However eurocrats love crises. This is how they accumulate power. And the last area they don’t control is defence. So there is already talk about huge spending, new eurodebt (which will make member states further dependent on Brussels), and of course a new European army. You may ask yourself what is Europe gaining in prolonging the war. The answer is time. Time to build this army. And justification to Europeans that this army is really needed. If Trump starts withdrawing forces from Europe, this will be like a cherry on top.
Because once this new force is created, I promise you 2 major consequences:
– diminished role of the US major export product – the $;
– return to EU’s cooperation with Russia, but on more favorable terms than before.
Stronger cooperation with China is also a possibility that I can imagine.
Personally I hope that Trump’s admin starts playing a more careful divide and conquer game, than these rather simplistic applications of the classical game theory that we are seeing right now.
Divemedic · March 5, 2025 at 11:31 am
So how about Europe paying the US for all of this free security? You are a European, so of course you want the gravy train to continue. However, it cannot continue to be the US getting taken advantage of.
wojtek · March 5, 2025 at 12:00 pm
As I explained above, the European perspective is that Europe has been “paying” the US since Bretton Woods. You don’t see it, b/c as an individual taxpayer you bear almost all of the US costs of force projection that maintains the status quo (I mean taxes on US companies are not a significant source of federal revenue, right?). Whereas directly you do not see the benefits. But you have been “reaping” these benefits your whole life through low cost of debt.
Now, I am not saying that de-dollarization as they call it would plunge US into chaos. But your borrowing costs would increase significantly and I believe the average US consumer is very exposed to higher costs of borrowing.
So let’s put all that talk of “being taken advantage of” aside. This is a transaction that so far was beneficial to all parties involved.
Michael · March 5, 2025 at 12:17 pm
Pax Americana is as expensive as Pax Romana.
Both cost their empires far more blood and treasure than it gained.
Both suffer from excessive hubris of “ruling the world” (in various cute ways to say that) suffer from MASSIVE GRAFT from traitors inside the empire (looking at Politicians and War Machine makers F35 Thunder turkey. little crappy ships etc.) and way too much social Bread and Circuses.
Time to stop the bleeding before Europe gets us into a real war(tm) vs the “Cheap Deal” as one blogger likes to say Proxy War to “weaken Russia”.
Danny · March 5, 2025 at 12:26 pm
Good post — agree that we need to stop this financial hemmorage. And it really appears that our military has been protection for various business interests doesn’t it? Hmmm …
We could stay in UN just cut back our money – way back. Then we could send that dipshit with the cane to yell and disrupt the security council meetings.
SoCoRuss · March 5, 2025 at 1:03 pm
Why do we continue to do it over and over again? That’s the big one. One answer is Europe is even more bankrupt than us and have no natural resources to fall back on and NEED another world war to erase that debt. They need to take Russia’s resources to extend this little fantasy of theirs out for a few more years.They live in a fantasy world of they are still on top and in control of the world.
And a dirty little secret they WILL collapse everything before they will give up anything.
As for the US and Europe its because that’s what a collapsing civilization does at the end. Wars and spending and depravity. The people causing all this are protected in case things go bad and they will continue on robbing us blind while they do it because nothing will happen to them they will go happily into their bunkers and swim in piles of cash while the above ground glows for a few hundred years, but the American people of course are not protected since they are just stupid cattle and eaters. But the American people just cant seem to grasp this issue at all since the problem is at a above 6th grade level of understanding. The dumbing down of this country is intentional not just a byproduct.
A stupid people are easily controlled. Whitey especially Whitey Americans used to be genetically able to reason and too smart for this bullshit. So they must be dumbed down as we have seen or sent to the camps or killed off by low intelligence Amish invaders. Whichever way works the best.
Trumps Tech Lords are no better than Europe’s or the Woke Pedophile Demo Commies Tech lords in fact they WERE The Dems tech lords last time and now we must believe they are on our side? WTF., Understand that the normies are just cattle to be used and abused at their will to all of them. To put it in simple terms they all want to create a new Feudal Technocracy control system. Once that’s fully in place they will begin the culling of the population until its reaches the level they want. Anyone notice how the Chinese at Wuhan labs now have another COVID that’s crossed with MERS, of course its all nature created nothing unnatural to see here. Think that is a coincidence??? These fucks all have backup plans in case things must be moved up.
People need to understand the situation.
Neither Trump or us can save the world or this country from itself, its too late. You can only hope you can maybe save yourself and your family…..
Divemedic · March 5, 2025 at 3:36 pm
I don’t think that bunkers full of cash will help you if the country outside of the bunker is gone. What are you going to spend the cash on? Think on this a bit harder.
Gryphon · March 5, 2025 at 1:19 pm
Good Observations here, but remember that the Entirety of the Clusterf*kk in The ukraine was started by, promoted and still desperately supported by a certain (((tribe))) that was originally from that Region, before the Rus kicked them out and scattered them throughout the rest of Europe. Now that Russia has Overthrown their communist ZOG, they know Full Well that what is happening on their Border is (((their))) attempt to re-Conquer, and this Time, Break Up Russia permanently. (there’s even a Map of this plan, that (((they)) published).
Germany is still under Military Occupation since Bankster’s War 2. “NATO” was conceived to “Keep the Americans In, the Russians Out, and the Germans Down.” (quote by (((someone))) I don’t remember). It continues to fulfill that last one, as well as being an Endless Grift for the MIC, which is why its Weapons don’t work and are overpriced. It is abundantly clear that NATO is the tool the zionists are using to try and start Bankster’s War 3, and as Trump is also controlled by (((them))), I really doubt that he will (be permitted to) Withdraw from it.
IMO, the best thing that can happen, both for the Eurozionists and the FUSSA is that Trump can drag his feet just enough that Russia can finish the ‘Cleanup’ of it’s Borderlands, which is the actual meaning of “The ukraine”. (correct Capitalization shown) If it does Spread beyond the borderlands, I suspect that the Russians will Not use Nukes, unless the FUSSA does to them. The Russian Rocket Forces have demonstrated that their Non-Nuclear ‘Bunker Busters’ can Destroy ANY ‘hardened’ Underground Facilities. And these Warheads can also be carried by their ‘Yars’ and ‘Carmat’ Heavy ICBM’s.
Divemedic · March 5, 2025 at 3:34 pm
Dude, I can’t even follow this. The only thing I get from this is “the Jews” and I just don’t believe those conspiracy theories.
SoCoRuss · March 5, 2025 at 1:30 pm
For those who believe SCROTUS will protect us and that old piece of paper. Look at their decision on USAID that just got released.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/scotus-rules-nearly-2-billion-frozen-usaid-payments
The president has no executive authority now since district judges with no authority on a case can now mandate actions. When will a district judge rule that the US Must Invade Russia? And no that’s not a joke.
Its clear Roberts is on the Epstein list as for Comey Barrett, I’m not sure if or how she is compromised or if she is just a stupid cunt.
Divemedic · March 5, 2025 at 3:28 pm
If you read the court’s order, (pdf warning)it makes sense and I happen to agree with it.
The order that they upheld was:
The dissent expands upon this:
The court is simply saying that some of the work that was requested by the government has already been done, and the people who did that work are entitled to be paid. Whether or not we think that the work should have been done in the first place (and I largely do not think that it should have been) the work was already done, the goods and services already carried out, and the people who did them are entitled to be paid.
SoCoRuss · March 6, 2025 at 3:13 pm
I understand work already done and deserving payment and agree to a point. But there is a little more to this. The payments were paused not canceled due to all the fraud in USAID and these payments seemed to be possibly fraudulent. And there is the little issue of separation of powers between branches. A little piss ant District judge doesn’t have the authority to order the federal Exec branch around. Now the payments were paused and the little judge didn’t like that and needed more press since the Alzheimer Joe or somebody put him in in seat and he wanted to say thank you I guess. Any he demanded that the money be paid within 36 Hours which DOJ and the plaintiffs lawyers even USAID admitted wasn’t possible and that demand started all this. ANY federal payment can be stopped if deemed fraudulent or possibly fraudulent to verify payments meets all federal payments standards.
Anyway The Federalist has a good article on this, here is a portion that’s covers a lot:
Lower courts don’t have authority to usurp the executive branch through restraining orders and injunctions, no matter what the SCOTUS says.
The Supreme Court’s shocking decision on Wednesday to allow a D.C. district court judge to order the Trump administration to disburse $2 billion in federal grant money is a major blow to the separation of powers undergirding our constitutional system of government.
But the thing about separation of powers is that they stand or fall together. All three branches of our government — legislative, executive, and judicial — have to respect the Constitution’s clear separation of powers. If one of them doesn’t, there’s no reason that the others should.
Put another way, if the Supreme Court can simply disregard the Executive branch’s constitutional authority and allow it to be usurped by an inferior federal court, which is what happened, then there’s no reason the Executive branch under Trump should pay any attention to what the Supreme Court says in this case, because it’s trying to assert an authority it simply doesn’t have.
So here’s what happened. As part of an administration-wide effort to crack down on fraudulent and wasteful federal spending, President Trump ordered a review of all federal grants, and also ordered that payments on all grants should be paused while the review is ongoing. Some of those grant recipients sued, and in a 5-4 decision handed down Wednesday, the Supreme Court denied a request by the Trump administration to vacate a recent ruling by D.C. District Court Judge Amir Ali (a Biden appointee) that ordered the State Department and United States Agency for International Development (USAID) to disburse about $2 billion in federal grants to nongovernmental groups for “work already completed.”
In mid-February, Ali had issued a temporary restraining order that prohibited the Trump administration from pausing the disbursement of funds, arguing that the respondents were likely to succeed in showing the government violated the Administrative Procedures Act. After issuing this restraining order, Ali apparently grew frustrated by the slow pace of the disbursement of funds and on Feb. 25 issued a second order requiring the government to pay out about $2 billion in grant funds within 36 hours.
The Trump administration responded by filing an application to the SCOTUS asking it to vacate Ali’s order and issue a stay on his ruling. Chief Justice John Roberts granted an administrative stay and referred the administration’s petition to the full court for review.
The high court’s decision came down Wednesday, 5-4, with Roberts and Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett joining the court’s Democrat appointees to deny the Trump administration’s request. The majority didn’t give a reason for this denial, which is too bad, because the ruling should trigger a constitutional crisis.
In a blistering dissent, Associate Justice Samuel Alito slammed the majority for giving a green light to the lower court’s judicial overreach. “Does a single district-court judge who likely lacks jurisdiction have the unchecked power to compel the Government of the United States to pay out (and probably lose forever) 2 billion taxpayer dollars?” Alito wrote. “The answer to that question should be an emphatic ‘No,’ but a majority of this Court apparently thinks otherwise. I am stunned.”
Alito is right to be stunned. Here is a case in which a district judge, Ali, is explicitly claiming for himself executive authority to disburse federal funds and determine the time and manner in which the funds will be disbursed — powers clearly vested not in the judiciary but in the executive branch, that is, with President Trump. Ali simply brushed aside the Trump administration’s argument that sovereign immunity barred the enforcement order and arrogated to himself the right to exercise executive powers.
Full link:https://thefederalist.com/2025/03/06/if-the-supreme-court-is-going-to-ignore-the-constitution-trump-should-ignore-the-supreme-court/
Another issue in all of this is these little judges doing all these is multiple ones of them have spouses and family members, funny how that is,that are running these NGOs and are making millions for doing nothing and no one says anything about personal financial conflict of interest. One of these judge is a Canadian citizen? I didn’t know you could be a American judge and yet be a another country’s citizen.
Like all the crap going on now, there are multiple angles to all of this and that confuses things.
Those Epstein videos of Roberts must really be something.
But at the end all of this doesn’t matter, its all still political theater. Nothing can stop this train from hitting the other oncoming train.
old geezer · March 7, 2025 at 12:04 am
other folks have pointed out, when there is fraud your contract is null and void.
that being said, i would certainly not tell the court to enforce their ruling, i’d just pay the bill very slowly … starting 4 years from now ( i remember hearing the phrase – slow walk )
Danny · March 5, 2025 at 5:48 pm
https://x.com/HoodedClaw1974/status/1897184307925631074?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1897184307925631074%7Ctwgr%5E4fc185bdbcb2bbb938f080baa8345521cd012980%7Ctwcon%5Es1_c10&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fvladtepesblog.com%2F
lynn · March 5, 2025 at 7:03 pm
We need to walk away from NATO. Today.
Aesop · March 6, 2025 at 5:54 am
How’d that same tack work out with the League Of Nations in 1919?
Just curious.
JimmyPx · March 6, 2025 at 10:22 am
Aesop, the League of Nations was an early version of the UN rather than a military alliance like NATO. NATO has outlived its purpose and it is time to shut it down.
It needs to be replaced with what Putin has called for for years which are new security agreements for all of Europe.
Regarding the UN, it needs to be reformed. The Security Council is a joke with the veto power, that needs to end. They should just get rid of the Security Council and decisions are based on the votes of ALL members. Of course our “pals” in Israel wouldn’t like that because they rightfully would get their asses kicked for all of the shady things they do.
Aesop · March 6, 2025 at 5:52 am
There’s absolutely no reason Europe cannot pick up the slack, for both Ukraine, and NATO itself.
So tell us how that happens, exactly.
Wanting is not getting, and while answers dither, consequences for dithering aren’t waiting around, because like rust, enemies never sleep.
Your wife should close the garage and lock the front door, but whose bed will the burglar be leaning over at 3AM if you don’t make sure both are done regardless of who could do that?
A similar corollary is explaining to the NYFC cab that you, the pedestrian, had the right of way. From under his bumper.
“Wish in one hand…“
JimmyPx · March 6, 2025 at 10:44 am
THIS is what people in the US are so sick of, the “Global Cop” role that none of us asked for or wanted. The British did this for a century and it bankrupted them just as it has bankrupted US.
The Ukraine is not and has never been in our national interest yet Biden and our dumbass Congress sent 350 BILLION dollars with at least half of that stolen and much of the military hardware sold on the black market. It has pushed us to the brink of WWIII with the Russians and what have we gained ?
A smirking, arrogant POS wearing a Che Guevera costume in OUR Oval Office being an ungrateful prick. Meanwhile Starmer and Macron act like it’s 1900 at the height of Pax Britannia and the French Empire when now those idiots couldn’t even field 2 divisions of troops if they wanted to.
People are sick of it when we have so many problems at home. Europe has the money and GDP to have their own military and handle their own affairs. If they choose to have no military and piss their money away on massive welfare problems that’s their problem.
NO ONE in the US wants to admit we are approaching bankruptcy and we DON’T have the money for this BS anymore. Trump is trying to wind down the US Empire and God bless him for trying.
Otherwise if Harris got in and we continued to antagonize the Russians, the odds we’d all be dead via canned sunshine. If by some miracle that didn’t happen the day the Brics currency came out backed by hard assets would soon make IT the reserve currency of the World rather than the dollar and we’d financially be like Greece and the dollar not worth shit.
old geezer · March 7, 2025 at 12:13 am
foxtrotting brilliant greek guy – ready to fight to last ukrainian. so, when do you enlist, get your guts spilling out on the kraines great farmland ?
sure, try to stick it to ivan in his own back yard. does the phrase, if we go down we’ll take you with us, mean anything to you.
europe is foxtrotting laughingstock
Comments are closed.