The headline reads: “Apopka daughter asks for fair chance after parents detained, father deported.” The left uses emotion to manipulate people. It doesn’t matter if it’s a shooting, a deportation, or even attempting to quote the Bible, the left wants to use your own feelings against you.
In this case, the leftist who wrote it wants you to believe that a little girl is being deprived of her hardworking parents. The reality is different- the daughter is old enough to drink, and her parents entered the country illegally, applied for residency 20 years ago, then never showed up to their appointment. A deportation order was entered against them.
In the intervening decades, he “ran a successful business.” What they don’t mention is that the reason the business was successful is because they are illegal. The name of the business is Juarez Investments, LLC. It was operating without licenses or registration until 2021. Meaning that they likely weren’t paying taxes for nearly 20 years. If I didn’t have to pay taxes, my business could be more successful as well. They aren’t law abiding, they are tax evading freeloaders who are making the lives of people legally living here even harder in the form of lower wages and higher costs.
This pair has been flouting the law for more than 2 decades. It’s about time they are sent home to Guatemala.
9 Comments
It's just Boris · July 19, 2025 at 6:47 am
I’m about at the point where I’d like to see assets stripped before they’re deported. Criminals should not profit from their crimes.
Banzaibob · July 19, 2025 at 7:51 am
Strpping assets from those who knowingly hire illegals would also be a good idea. Then use the proceeds to help communities who had to bear the cost of these non taxpayers.
Himself · July 19, 2025 at 7:34 am
I know a woman whose in-laws were refugees from El Salvador back in the day. Never got their citizenship. It was more advantageous to be a resident. They had six kids here, all great, hardworking people. There was talk Biden (at the time) was going to sunset the asylum eligibility. She wasn’t happy when I said tough shit. They’ve had decades to get it together. Sucks to be them. But if they are ‘piilars’ of the community, they should have set anchor.
Scot Irish · July 19, 2025 at 3:13 pm
Sorry. Don’t care. They all must go back.
oldvet50 · July 19, 2025 at 7:52 am
So you’re saying they weren’t “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” ?
@HomeInSC · July 19, 2025 at 9:44 am
I’m unmoved by Lefty appeals to emotion.
Meanwhile, back in Rottington DC, The effort to stick amnesty in bills never ceases.
https://www.newsweek.com/migrants-immigration-maria-salazar-republicans-house-2099411
Honk Honk · July 19, 2025 at 3:21 pm
I like the meme about we spent decades fighting the CCCP in a cold war only to become a gay and retarded version of it.
AKA the Long March of quisling traitors.
TRX · July 19, 2025 at 8:05 pm
> It’s about time they are sent home to Guatemala.
—
True. But their detention and return fare ought to come out of their assets (proceeds of crime, since they’re illegals) or from their home country.
Divemedic · July 20, 2025 at 11:00 am
I would agree, but taking their property is supposed to take due process. Sending them home, IMO, does not require that. Of course, with the advent of asset forfeiture, due process for taking property has been effectively eliminated.
Comments are closed.