So the FBI has spent 5 and a half years not telling us what the motive for the Las Vegas shooter was, and now they try to tell us that it was because he wasn’t getting good enough comps from the casino? I call bullshit.
Then they try to sell us on the fact that he was angry because he wasn’t winning. That’s also bullshit. I am a bit of a gambler myself, although not even close to gambling as much as this guy did. Even I know that you don’t win all that much or that often.
In 2006, for example, Paddock gambled more than $945,000 and came out with roughly $4,300 in winnings…that during one stay from Sept. 12 to 14, just a few weeks before the shooting, Paddock lost $38,000.
A guy who gambles with a million at a time lost $38k? That’s nothing. I don’t buy for one second that the shooting had one thing at all to do with gambling or comps. The money quote is this one:
In 2018, Las Vegas Sheriff Joe Lombardo said that a 10-month investigation by the department resulted in “no evidence of conspiracy or a second gunman” and no definitive motive for the shooter.
Maybe the Vegas sheriff’s department should read this blog, because I found quite a few inconsistencies, and many of them look like the work of US intelligence agencies.



