Anti American left

Aesthetica

The following is a thread on X (Twitter) that comes from user Aesthetica. He lays out a good case. I condense it here for easier reading. These are not my words:

BEGIN QUOTE

I am now 100% confident that Charlie’s assassination was carried out by a radical left wing transgender terror cell. Let’s get into the evidence 1) Tyler was dating a living with a transgender man (male to female)

2) Two of the bullets found in Tyler’s rifle had engravings consistent with radical far left transgender ideology “Notices bulge OwO” is a reference to “chasers” gay men who like trans women. (NOTE FROM DIVEMEDIC: It’s my understanding that this is from a Meme and is something to do with the ‘furry’ community- end note) Noticing the trans man’s “bulge” “catch fascist” is self explanatory

3) Tyler’s transgender boyfriend is friends with a transgender account on tik tok and X that goes by the name “churbum75m (saw Tyler June 30th)” Minutes after Charlie was confirmed dead this transgender posted “WE FUCKING DID IT”

4) But this wasn’t the only transgender account that had prior knowledge of the assassination. At least two other transgender people had posted in advance that something would happen to Charlie during his speaking event at UVU.

5) We know that Tyler was very active on transgender discords. A hotbed for radicalization and far left extremism. Was this discord server used to plan the attack?

6) We know that Tyler was “given” the rifle and did not purchase it himself. Who gave it to him? This was obviously a combined effort involving multiple people so one can only assume he got help from his transgender associates.

Another transgender account has been found to have had prior knowledge of the assassination. That’s now 6 far left trans terrorists who had advanced knowledge.

This is the end of the Twitter thread that I am posting here. Please remember that this remains unconfirmed. If any one of my readers can confirm that the above photos are accurate or confirm sources, please do so in comments. Remember that all comments here remain anonymous. If you don’t want the actual comment posted, just put “do not post” as the first line of the comment, and I will not publish it. All comments here are still being moderated.

By Divemedic, ago

CW2: When?

For the past six years, I have chronicled the left’s stated desire to kill those on the right. They call us Nazi’s.

They argue that free speech doesn’t include ‘hate speech’ before defining ‘hate speech’ to be anything with which they disagree. There has been an escalating record of physical violence.

So it comes as no surprise that they killed someone in such a blatant manner. No, what surprises me is that so many of the members of the left are just coming right out and saying that Charlie Kirk deserved to die because of the beliefs that he held, with many of those beliefs being ones that I myself hold.

What this means, is that those members of the left want to kill me as well. Likely you, too, if you read this blog. I had one lefty even tell me that this killing finally taught those on the right what empathy was. If someone tells you that you are their enemy and they want to kill you, take them at their word. There is no discussion that can be had at this point. The only possible outcome is violence.

I have always felt that a second Civil War was unlikely in my lifetime. I don’t think that any longer. I feel that it is now inevitable. The only question now is when. That time grows closer with every passing day. I think that the first shots have already been fired.

By Divemedic, ago

Motives Unknown

They caught the shooter. He confessed to his father, who then contacted a minister who put them in contact with a US Marshal. I commend that father for doing what was right. I also wonder who will get the $100,000 in reward money, and if it goes to the father, will that money be used for the suspect’s defense?

What kills me is that the MSM is saying that no motive is yet known for the shooting, and they don’t know if it was political or not, even though the ammo in the murder weapon was inscribed with things like “Here fascist, catch.”

No, the left has to own this one. They won’t, though.

Instead they will bleat on about J6 or Pelosi’s husband getting attacked with a hammer after he stiffed a male prostitute more than once in a single night.

By Divemedic, ago

Leftist Calls to Violence

Don’t forget:

I am not as big as someone like Charlie Kirk, but I have been the recipient of deplatforming attempts. I have gotten death threats. Not just on this blog or its associated email address. A couple of nutjobs have actually found my real email address and sent threats there. I can only take that as a threat that they know who I am.

So yeah, the left are the ones fomenting violence.

For the record, I am not suicidal, homicidal, or contemplating committing a violent act in any manner inconsistent with self defense.

Now, if you will excuse me, I am off to write a paper for my class. I have to get off of here and do something productive…

By Divemedic, ago

Fighting Words

Fighting words are:

“Words which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace.”

This comes from the Supreme Court case Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (1942). The Court held that certain “well-defined and narrowly limited” categories of speech are not protected by the First Amendment—including fighting words.

Just being offensive isn’t enough. The speech has to be:

  • Directed at a specific individual.
  • Likely to provoke an immediate violent reaction.

You be the judge: Is showing up to a candlelight vigil for Charlie Kirk, then standing in the middle of the crowd yelling “Fuck Charlie Kirk” fit the category of “fighting words?” If so, it isn’t proteected speech. They guy that did exactly that did so because he wanted to incite a reaction from the crowd. He got what he wanted.

The cops had no business interfering with the ass whipping that he wanted, asked for, and was about to get.

By Divemedic, ago

Just the Tip

Read this guy’s perspective on rights:

Ludwig believes that all rights come from government. That’s patently ridiculous. If I were alone on an island, I would have the right to speech. I could keep and bear arms. The only way that I can lose those rights is if someone takes them from me.

That’s why government morally exists- to keep others from taking your rights. This is why we have a Constitution that lays out the powers of government- what that government CAN do, and what it CAN NEVER do.

Not so in Mr. Ludwig’s world. He believes that, unless there is a government present that tells me I may speak, I simply don’t have the right to do so. That’s fundamentally out of line with the ideas of the Founders of this Nation, whose thoughts on this were based upon the philosophies of John Locke and Thomas Hobbes.

This is where the left gets the idea that food, shelter, clothing, and healthcare are human rights. They are not, and they never have been. If I have a human right to any of those things, it follows that I can force someone to provide it to me.

Enter a law forcing someone to pick my cotton, my oranges, build my houses, and perform free healthcare services. Even enacting price controls is a form of slavery, and to claim otherwise is exactly the same thing as saying “if I only put the tip in, it isn’t rape.”

The saddest part of this, is that Mr. Ludwig is an attorney. His college failed him when they failed to teach the basics of the Constitution and its underlying philosophy.

By Divemedic, ago