CNN now says, well- it’s too crazy to paraphrase, so here is the quote:
Perhaps you posted that meme of supermodel Tyra Banks exploding in anger on “America’s Next Top Model” (“I was rooting for you! We were all rooting for you!”). Or maybe you’ve simply posted popular GIFs, such as the one of NBA great Michael Jordan crying, or of drag queen RuPaul declaring, “Guuuurl…”
If you’re Black and you’ve shared such images online, you get a pass. But if you’re White, you may have inadvertently perpetuated one of the most insidious forms of contemporary racism.
So to sum up contemporary equity theory: No matter what you do, if you are white, you are a racist. See, we already know that the mere allegation of a white man calling a black man a “nigger” is considered to be justification for aggravated assault in the minds of black people. There have been many court cases proving that. It’s called the “n word” defense.
a white person calling a black person a “nigger” is fighting words that justify whatever happens to the white person as a result of violence on the part of any black person within earshot.
In fact, the Nevada Law Journal has put forward the Critical Race Theory idea(pdf alert) that racial words activate a syndrome in blacks called “post traumatic slave syndrome,” which according to them is “a condition that exists when a population has experienced multigenerational trauma resulting from centuries of slavery and continues to experience oppression and institutionalized racism today.”
They claim that using words that hurt people’s feelings is a form of violence that justifies the use of force in self defense, but only if the person using them is a heterosexual white male. The justification is that: “The problem of psychological assault appears across ethnic, gender, and socio-economic lines, but has a greater impact on marginalized social groups such as women, children, African Americans, and the LGBT community.” They call the use of these terms Socio-Psychological Tyranny (SPT), and claim that the Second Amendment serves as a constitutional basis for the use of physical force in protecting the liberty, psychological, and dignity interest of citizens—that is, it justifies defending the spirit as well as the body.
But only against white males.
The article in the Nevada Law Journal is written by a Law Professor, who is laying down a legal argument for genocide against whites. How does he propose to do this? Changing the law. His proposed law would read:
A person is justified in using non-deadly physical force to ward off abusive conduct that the person reasonably perceives as creating a substantial risk of causing serious psychological injury.
“Abusive conduct” is defined as: conduct that a reasonable person would find hostile or offensive without superseding social, business or cultural value.
“Serious psychological injury” is defined as long-term injuries such as anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress.
In determining whether offensive conduct rises to the level of abuse, courts should weigh the severity, nature, and frequency of the conduct . A single act normally will not constitute abusive conduct, but an especially severe and egregious act may meet this standard. Abusive conduct may include, but is not limited to: repeated infliction of verbal abuse such as the use of derogatory remarks, insults, and epithets; verbal or physical conduct that a reasonable person would find threatening, intimidating, or humiliating.
The part that makes this truly worrisome, and specifically targets white males is this:
The question of whether the target’s response was reasonable should take into account power imbalances between the aggressor and the target, and whether the aggressor was previously aware of the target’s “emotional vulnerability and needlessly attempted to exploit that vulnerability.
Power imbalance is how the left justifies saying that blacks can’t be racist, because they have no power.
The paper then goes on to claim that “the Second Amendment was framed to empower citizens to counteract power imbalances.”
It goes on:
Clearly, the Second Amendment is concerned with tyranny and oppression and the founder’s notions of tyranny and oppression far exceeded the threat of physical violence. Severe emotional and psychological abuse, such as the use of the word nigger in certain contexts and sustained psychological violence in domestic situations, clearly constitute oppression. When the powerful commit it against the less powerful, it signifies a brand of tyranny: SPT.
Get it? You are white, therefore a racist. Since you are a racist, anything that you do or say, including simply being a white male, justifies the use of force to rectify that situation.
The stage is being set for a genocidal war between straight white males and the rest of the nation. White males are being “othered” and targeted for elimination. I seriously don’t want to sound like this is a racist website, but it seems like more and more, people like me are being targeted with calls to violence.
