Below, you will see the deposition of a Brevard County Deputy who arrested a man for trespassing and obstruction. The man was in a parking lot, filming a cop who was on a road 35 feet away, conducting a traffic stop. The officer here being deposed arrived on the scene and told the man that he was being trespassed, ordered him to get in his vehicle and leave.
The man walked away, and immediately left the property. He was arrested for trespassing and obstruction. The law of trespassing is where a person refuses to leave private property after being told to leave. It says nothing of leaving your vehicle and wife behind. The cop even admits that leaving your vehicle behind isn’t a crime, but leaving it behind after a cop orders you not to, is.
The case here is one that is literally “respect mah authoritay” when the man didn’t do exactly as the cop told him to, the law be damned.
It is long past time for police to lose qualified immunity.
Police identified the car that was involved in the carjacking as a Green 2002 Acura. There are only three of them in the state of Florida.
The car was purchased at a “buy here, pay here” place in February. The purchaser was never seen again after buying it, despite owing money on the car.
The car was towed on March 19.
The tow truck driver was shot at over 100 times by a 10mm and killed on April 10.
The carjacking turned muder happened on April 11.
The car was found abandoned and towed on April 13
On top of that, despite police claiming that the woman and her husband had no relatives or known associates in the Orlando area, the woman’s husband and brother contacted the wife of an Orange County Deputy, and coopted the Deputy into calling the Seminole County Deputies who were conducting the investigation, and posing as someone else, recorded the call and forwarded a copy of the recording to the husband.
This is some organized crime television drama. It stinks of organized crime.
Last May, this dyke cop pulls a gun on a man who called 911 after he had another man threaten him with a gun. Here is a short summary of the story.
If you want to know why the cops there are such assholes, simply advance to the 5:20 mark of the video and listen to how the Police Chief addresses the man who was there to file a complaint, then threatens him with yet another arrest.
Finally, after the above video was released, the cops released investigation materials and announced that the cop had been fired. I’m guessing that was because the cops knew at this point that they were in deep shit, so they needed a sacrificial lamb.
Watch the video of her internal affairs interview that includes her body cam footage and hear the following exchange:
LesboCop: “I’m detaining you.”
Guy: “For what crime?”
LesboCop: “Because you don’t want to listen.”
Guy: “That’s not a crime. You’re fucked. Are your bodycams on?”
Guy: “You don’t get to tell me what to do.”
LeboCop: “Yes I do.”
and therein lies the problem. Cops think that because they have a badge and a gun, that they are our masters whose commands must be obeyed. Before you get into the whole “resisting an officer” thing, you should note that a person can’t resist an officer in the LAWFUL performance of their duties. If what the officer is doing is unlawful, there can be no crime for resisting them. We know that what she did was unlawful, because the cops admitted to that when they fired her for her unlawful actions.
She yells for him to drop the phone, then draws a gun on him when he refuses. There is nothing here that would indicate that drawing a firearm on him was appropriate. Watch her body cam video. He obeyed every one of her commands. Her problem was that he wasn’t showing the proper amount of deference and boot licking.
As soon as they display that they are treating you as a suspect, you should immediately say, “I am not answering any questions without a lawyer present.” Then shut the fuck up. There is no reason to EVER talk to a cop. The risks are too high.
She claims that she acted this way because someone on scene may have had a gun, and she wasn’t sure who had it. Her excuse?
“It’s never easy when you know there is a gun out there.”
Note that she never searched the guy who she was so concerned was armed that she drew down on him and placed him in cuffs, yet once they got to the guy who DID have a gun and matched the description of the guy with the gun, they didn’t draw on him. This wasn’t about a gun- this was about demanding that people kiss their ass because they are so brave. Now that we have permitless carry in Florida, expect unhinged cops like this to get worse.
This slot licking dyke then makes fun of the man’s nail polish and later tells her sergeant on camera: “Fuck that guy.” Totally unprofessional and unhinged. She is then asked by the sergeant: “Did anyone go talk to the other party?” (you know, the guy who actually DID have the gun that she was claiming as the cause of her unhinged behavior?) and she replied that no one had yet done so.
Then the guy who had brandished the gun had his gun taken and was allowed to leave the scene without charges. You know why? Because the cops don’t care if you commit a crime, as long as you lick the boots.
Why do I keep mentioning that the cop is a dyke? Because she was fired as a result of her unhinged handling of this incident, and is now claiming that she was fired because she is a lesbian. By the end of the interview, she began crying and blamed her behavior on stress and adrenaline, proving that she doesn’t have the temperament to be a cop.
To the supervisor’s credit, he drove the victim to Red Lobster, bought him lunch, then took him home. Why? Because they knew that they had fucked up.
Every other cop that was there is a bad cop. The department found that this cop violated the law and department procedure to the point that she was fired. Every other cop who was there should have received discipline for seeing her behavior and not only standing there, but actively assisting her in depriving this man of his rights- they left him in handcuffs for over four hours, despite them knowing that he hadn’t violated the law. Not only that, the dyke falsified his arrest report. There should be criminal charges here.
This was a bad cop, and everyone knew it. She used her police database access to stalk her lesbian lover’s ex, she left her department issued AR-15 in her patrol car, which was burglarized and the rifle stolen, and she had a previous incident exactly like the one that is the subject of this post. Despite all of this, she was allowed to keep her job earning over $100K per year.
When they finally did talk to the guy with the gun, the guy was allowed to sit in a chair and calmly answer questions. Security video showed that the guy with the gun was the aggressor. The dyke was calm and bordering on kind to the guy with the gun.
She then turned off her body camera. I maintain that any cop who turns off the body camera during an investigation, that investigation should by law be considered in automatically result in the cops entire testimony be disregarded.
This guy’s mistake was in calling the cops. At this point, they are to be considered to be unpredictable loose cannons who are just as likely to make a situation worse as they are to solve the problem. I can’t imagine a reason for calling the cops at this point.
On a side note that speaks to tactics- These cops were so focused on the guy who was arguing with them, that they ignored the reported gun that was on scene, even though they had been called about an armed individual. An ambusher could have wiped out all three of these idiots. That detail may be important someday.
To those who say that this man was interfering- what does the law say? What is the definition of interfering? It looks like he is far enough away to not be interfering, except for the imagination of the cop thinking that he is going to be attacked from 100 feet away.
The sentence that says it all: “Jesus, I thought you guys were supposed to be good.” When you have Joe Sixpack and Suzie Soccermom thinking that you aren’t the good guys, you have lost America.
As I have said before, all settlements and lawsuits for cop misbehavior should be paid directly from the police pension fund. If that means cop pensions get cut, then maybe the cops will clear out the ones who do shit like this. Make them have skin in the game.
Check out this video of Seattle cops slashing the tires of motorists. Remember when I told you that the entire state of Washington was in Zone 5, making it behind enemy lines?
These filthy swine were caught puncturing private citizens' tires when driving through a protest area in Seattle pic.twitter.com/WZc0tXSr2x
This is an election year. As the year progresses, expect violence and rhetoric to get increasingly worse, more widespread, and more obvious. The time from now until next January will become increasingly dangerous, especially in areas that are Zone 3 or higher.
Areas in zone 5 are areas where the government has ceded or lost all control and/or has openly declared that they cannot and will not provide basic government services like police, fire, and EMS. These areas are completely out of legitimate governmental control and can best be described as being behind enemy lines. Government authority has either effectively or openly sided with the insurgents and is providing them with active support. Anyone who finds themselves in one of these areas is advised to leave immediately, even if this means abandoning property.
In a city where it takes cops a half an hour to respond to a cop being shot, how long will you have to wait when you call them to report the killer breaking into your home?
The coward of Broward, Scot Peterson was allowed to retire with his pension intact, even though he hid during the Parkland School Massacre, even though as the School’s Resource Officer, it was his job to protect the school’s students. The parents of the victims sued, and his lawyer just said–
under the law, his client cannot be sued for anything he did or didn’t do during the Feb. 14, 2018, massacre. He cited appellate court cases that say police officers don’t have a legal obligation to protect others from third-party harm and cannot be sued for decisions they make during a crisis. There is a difference between legal duty and what I guess I’ll call societal expectations,” the attorney for the sheriff’s deputy argued. All the public will hear is that Peterson was in uniform and had a gun, he said, yet “When faced with this murderous rampage going on in this three-story building, he doesn’t have a duty to stop it?”
So if police don’t have a duty to do anything, then why do we even have SROs in school in the first place? Just like Uvalde, we know that the police are cowardly pussies. That’s how we know that they aren’t about to go door to door to take shit.
