I Refuse

I just did something for the first time in my 35 years as a healthcare worker- I refused to accept a patient. When I got to work, the nurses in one zone were keeping a ratio of 4 to 1. My assignment was to take 3 patients from 3 different nurses, which together with the other nurses arriving at the same time as I would be lowering the zone to a 3 to 1 ratio.

Two of the nurses turned over their patients with no issues. The third nurse was Nurse Slacker, so I took a look at the chart. The patient had been placed in that room an hour and a half earlier, and nothing had been done. No vital signs had been taken, no IV started, no lab work ordered or drawn, and no assessment had been done. I went to the charge nurse and told him that I would not be accepting responsibility for that patient until the nurse actually did her job.

 I will not be placing my name anywhere on that nurse’s chart and refuse to accept her patients unless they are properly cared for and it is properly documented. I am not risking my medical license for that incompetent, lazy slacker of a nurse. You can’t make me assume care for someone else’s patients when that person hasn’t done a single thing for them. The rest of the nurses in the zone won’t assist her because they aren’t willing to do her job for her, either.

When she finally came to me to give me report two hours later, she hadn’t even noticed that the charge nurse had done everything, treated the patient, and discharged her an hour earlier. That’s right, her patient had been gone for an hour and she never even noticed.

The charge nurse had no problem with it, and said that it would help if she wasn’t off the floor half the time. Management needs to do something, but they won’t.

EDITED TO ADD

For those who are asking: She is white. However, she is in a protected class, that of breastfeeding mothers. It’s due to a Federal law called the Providing Urgent Maternal Protections for Nursing Mothers Act (PUMP Act). The law says that employees who are nursing have the right to reasonable break time and a place, other than a bathroom, that is shielded from view to express breast milk while at work. Sure, it says reasonable, but that is subject to a court’s interpretation. What this means is exactly what the woman has told fellow employees- she can be in the pumping lounge as often and for as long as SHE thinks is reasonable. On of our charge nurses told me that they had a meeting about her, and they have been told that she is untouchable because she has already been to HR with her attorney in tow.

Milking It

Being a female dominated profession, nursing has quite a few new mothers. A couple of them are abusing the law to their advantage. The PUMP Act states that women must be permitted breaks so that they can be milked like a cow, and boy are some of them milking it.

While at work, I was instructed to cover one of these women’s patients while she went to go pump. She was gone for 2 hours. When she returned, she was only back for half an hour before she took a lunch break. After returning from that, she went to go pump again for another hour and a half. In all, she was off the floor for over 5 hours out of her 12 hour shift. When we told her that we thought she was taking too long, with even another woman telling her that it doesn’t take that long to pump, she replied that she can go as often and for as long as she deems necessary.

So we went to supervision to complain. They explained to us that there is nothing that they can do. Apparently, they had spoken to her about it, only to get a phone call from her lawyer the next day. So hands off. It’s so bad, that they are now afraid of her:

Last week, while I was covering her patients, I walked into the room of one of them to find a woman covered in blood, with large blood clots on the bed. She had a pulse of 120 and was complaining of belly pain. She had been lying there for over 2 hours like that. I intervened and went to the doctor. Turns out it was coming from her bladder, and I measured more than a liter of blood loss.

I got the patient straightened out before the nurse returned. About an hour later, I noticed on the telemetry board that the patient had a blood pressure of 80/50 and a heart rate of 120. I spoke to her and she told me that the patient would be fine. I went over her head to the charge nurse. Yeah, I dropped a dime on her.

The woman was taken to emergency surgery. The nurse? Nothing happened to her.

The very next day, same nurse had placed a patient on 2 liters of oxygen. The patient was in obvious distress with an O2 saturation of 78%. Another nurse saw this, took over care, called respiratory, and had the patient placed on BiPAP. Again, no repercussions for nurse slacker’s complete lack of anything competent.

I have told the charge nurse that I will not be placing my name anywhere on that nurse’s chart and refuse to watch over her patients while she is off the floor. I am not risking my medical license for that incompetent, lazy slacker of a nurse. You can’t make me assume care for someone else’s patients, especially when I already have 3 or 4 patients of my own.

Medicine Expensive?

This woman here had a child that was born prematurely. That child spent a month in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). The bill came to $738,360, and the mother complains that the cost is too high. There are many in the comments that agree, and it’s filled with comments about how other countries have free healthcare, which is of course false.

The bill for that child’s care is completely reasonable. Let me explain why:

Nurses work 3, 12 hour shifts per week, and NICU nurses are frequently on 1:1 care, meaning one nurse to one patient. A 30 day stay in the NICU means that your child had the undivided attention of 5 nurses for a month. An experienced nurse, (for obvious reasons NICU nurses tend to be fairly experienced, qualified, competent, and educated) aren’t cheap. The average pay for a NICU nurse in the US is about $130,000 a year. Night shift makes even more, thanks to shift differentials.

The nurses in charge of your child’s care cost the hospital $70,000 in direct compensation, plus the costs of insurance, training, and other HR expenses. In all, just the nursing care for that month in the hospital cost that hospital about $140,000. Now add in the costs of everyone involved in that from the doctors to the lab technicians, and even the janitors.

Each of those people is highly educated, even the janitor. Yes, the janitor. To comply with Federal law, that janitor has to be instructed on CPR, stroke procedures, HIPAA compliance, Medicare and Medicaid laws, sex trafficking, recognizing child abuse, disposing of medical waste, and a host of other laws. He also needs to be background and possibly drug checked, especially to work in a pediatric wing. All of this raises the cost of hiring that janitor.

Back to the nurses. It takes 3 years of schooling to become a registered nurse. Then it takes years of experience, training, and work to specialize as a NICU nurse. In all, the average NICU nurse has been a nurse for 5 years or more and has attended far more schooling than a beginning nurse. Pediatrics is a specialty. So is neonatology, as is critical care. NICU nurses have to certify as all three. That’s why they make what they make- competence costs money.

Then there is the lab work, the cost of provider that supervises those NICU nurses (usually a nurse practitioner), lab technicians, respiratory therapists, medications, medical equipment, supplies, meals, and even the guy that empties the trash. Then there are the doctors, as well as the regulatory costs of compliance.

In total, labor costs alone for that stay were probably in the neighborhood of $300,000, so I don’t think $700k is out of line once you do the math.

That isn’t even considering what procedures may have been done- if surgery was involved, you can also add anesthesia, scrub nurses, surgical nurses, and a host of other specialties and specialized equipment.

The argument that other countries offer free healthcare is false. The care isn’t free, it is paid for through taxes. Even then, there aren’t enough professionals to go around, so care is rationed, and even Canada offers to kill the patient, putting them down like a race horse with a broken leg once the cost of their care gets too expensive.

There are ways to make this sort of care cheaper, but every one of those ways involves compromising the level of care. You can increase the nurse to patient ratio, but this means that the patient is left to fend for themselves for longer periods of time. You can get away with that for an adult admitted with a broken hip, but not for an infant that is near death.

Americans demand perfect healthcare, but then complain when the bill comes due. You want good care, and you want it now? Then it won’t be cheap.

Evil

The FBI knew in 2021 that the COVID virus was bioengineered and didn’t tell President Biden. Of course they knew- I posted back in 2022 that the Federal government knew the virus was engineered using a segment of genetic material that was patented by Moderna back in 2016. The artificial genetic sequence is what gives this virus the particular affinity for human lung tissue that it has. The evidence is obvious- the virus is a bioweapon that was either accidentally or intentionally released into the wild. There can be no other explanation.

Since we also know that Fauci and our own government was funding this research, we can also conclude that our own government killed millions of people. Whether this was caused intentionally, or through large scale incompetence remains unclear, but in either case, it is painfully obvious that our government handles power in much the same way as a couple of four year old children who are playing in their father’s gun cabinet.

It Isn’t A System, It’s Market Manipulation

Everyone likes to complain that healthcare costs too much, and then complains about the “healthcare system” as if it is some sort of unified national entity that is controlled from the top. It isn’t. What we call healthcare in this country is a marketplace made up of hundreds of thousands of companies, each reacting on an individual basis to market conditions.

The largest of these changing conditions is CMS, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. They set the conditions under which they will pay for medical services. For example, if a person comes into the hospital with signs of sepsis, that person must receive a blood test for lactic acid levels. If that level is greater than two, the person must be tested again within 6 hours, or the hospital doesn’t get paid. This is repeated all over the entire field of payments from CMS. They regulate everything.

They tell hospitals what procedures must be done, how they will be done, and what each provider can charge for all of those procedures and tests. They also dictate that CMS has to be charged the same amount as every other patient. With CMS directly controlling 32% of all healthcare spending in the US, and indirectly controlling another 40% of medical spending by dictating policies to insurance companies, they are the 800 pound gorilla in the room.

If a provider doesn’t play ball, they don’t get paid, and can be added to the national list of “CMS doesn’t let this person be involved in medical payments” blacklist that effectively ruins your career by making sure that 72% of patients can’t use insurance, Medicare, or Medicaid to pay for your services. No one will hire you. It’s even a question on hospital job applications- “Are you on the CMS naughty list?”

So the market responds to that by doing what they are told to do by the Feds.

Then there are the patients themselves. I can’t tell you the number of times that a patient comes into the hospital every day with COPD but is still smoking. There are the diabetics who come in complaining of numbness in their feet, blurry vision, and stomach pain with a blood glucose level over 500 and an A1C of 12, but will lie and tell you that they are watching their diet and taking their medication. There are the drug addicts who come in twice a week because they overdosed, and the drug seekers who come in nearly every day looking for a pain med fix. (We have one woman who has already been in the ED 14 times this month, and it’s only 17 days into December.) The person having a stroke who has a history of high blood pressure, but doesn’t take their medication. Yes, each of these were patients I saw during the last week, and each of them blamed doctors for not fixing their problems in an hour or less, even though their problems were entirely self created.

There is an endless parade of patients who come in with cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome who won’t stop smoking weed, or STIs because they won’t stop mating with every person who will take their clothes off, Mental health patients, homeless who want free sandwiches, and illegal immigrants who use us as their primary care.

All of these people get seen under a law called EMTALA, which mandates that hospitals have them evaluated whether or not they can pay. Once they are evaluated, those CMS rules we talked about earlier dictate that they have to be treated. Then the entire thing gets paid for by your taxes.

Then after all of that, people then sue the practitioners, workers, hospitals, and drug makers who followed all of those rules and win millions of dollars in payouts.

The problem isn’t healthcare- we as a nation have the best healthcare in the world. What is screwing things up is market manipulation by the government. Imagine for a moment that the Feds were doing the same with the “restaurant system.” That is, 72% of all food was paid for by the government, who set standards on what everyone could eat, how much they could eat, how that food must be prepared, and under what conditions grocery stores and restaurants would be paid. Then they also dictated that anyone who went to a restaurant that had a drive through would have to be served whether or not they could pay for it, but then reimbursed the restaurant for the meal cost. All of this regulated to the point that there are hundreds of thousands of rules, each of which must be followed to the letter. What would a restaurant look like, and how much would a meal cost?

I don’t think most people have a problem with the care they are getting, and those who do frequently misunderstand why they got what care they did get. Most people are upset at the cost, and that cost is directly related to the government distorting the market, and the market’s entirely rational response to that manipulation.

What makes me laugh the most is that everyone then blames the doctors and other facilities, then demands that the government step in to fix the problems that the government created. That’s true whether you want more regulation, single payer, or some other government intervention.

Free Canadian Healthcare, Suicide, and COVID

We always hear from the left that “all of the other industrialized nations have free healthcare. You shouldn’t have to go bankrupt in order to be healthy.”

Too bad that’s all bullshit. Healthcare is a service that is provided by people who are, for the most part, skilled at what they do. To demand that they provide it for free is not possible, even if slavery were to make a reappearance. In the event of slavery, you can compel physical labor, but there is no way to demand intellectual labor. That is, you can make someone go to work as a doctor, but you can’t make them be good at it.

For that reason, healthcare can either be free, or it can be good. Purchasing quality requires money. (edited to add) In this case, those who advocate for ‘free’ healthcare really are saying that they want the rest of the people in the country to pay for their care. This is little different than the system of insurance that we have now, except that the system will be compulsory through taxation and the government will decide who gets care, instead of an insurance company deciding. (end edit) The higher the quality, the more the cost. Even then, the number of people who can and will make good doctors, nurses, and other health professionals is a finite pool. For that reason, healthcare is a limited resource.

It’s a resource that must be rationed somehow. After all, if there is a finite commodity like healthcare, there cannot be free healthcare to everyone to receive all of it that they wish, with either cost or simple capacity of facilities being the controlling factor. If I have to explain that to my readers, let’s just say that I would be extremely disappointed. Here in the United States, we ration healthcare by cost- people can only have the care that they can afford. In Canada, it used to be rationed by government quota. That system was breaking down; I know one man with dual citizenship who waited for over two years to receive a knee replacement before giving up and moving back to the US, getting the surgery less than 3 months later.

Canada has a problem with spending too many resources on the sick and elderly. Taking a page from Logan’s Run, they have decided to encourage the sick to simply kill themselves. It’s an effective way to control costs- take those who are costing you the most and simply kill them. In fact, more Canadians have died from government assisted suicide since the program began than have died from COVID. Beginning in 2027, that program will be expanded to include those with mental illness.

It’s hard to see that this is an idea that we as Americans would or should accept, but I find it odd that the left supports the same idea that began the Holocaust while at the same time calling those of us who are to the right of Joseph Stalin “literally Hitler.” If we were to expand that to include mental illness, millions of Americans would likely choose to end their lives.

That free healthcare comes at a cost. But hey, as long as you can use the money you used to spend on care to get yourself a new BMW, who cares if a few eggs have to be broken, amirite?

On Ventilation

Mammals, or humans in particular as it relates to this post, need to exchange gases. We take in oxygen and get rid of carbon dioxide. The process that we use to do that is breathing. There are two components to that process: ventilation, and respiration.

Ventilation is the mechanical process of moving air (or other gases) into and out of the lungs. Ventilation requires a functioning respiratory drive (provided by the CNS and portions of the PNS), an intact and functioning chest wall, the airways, and lung tissue that is functioning properly. Being a mechanical process, there are things that can affect it: physical blockages of the airway through trauma, inflammation, or even a failure to maintain open air passages because of dysfunction in the nervous system.

Respiration is the actual exchange of gases, first across the alveolar membranes, then into the blood, into the tissues of the body, then back to the blood and across the alveolar membranes to be expelled from the body. This process depends upon the relative pressures of the gases involved. Things like partial pressure, electrochemical gradient, pH, and other factors play a huge role in the moving of gases into and out of the lungs.

Entire textbooks are written on how this process works, so this limited post won’t be an exhaustive treatise on the function of the respiratory system. I want to mention mechanical ventilation and why intubating a patient and placing them on a ventilator is so important.

There are times when a patient’s respiration doesn’t function as it should. Perhaps the process of gas exchange has been disrupted because another gas has more affinity for the chemical reactions that are taking place, as is the case with hemoglobin’s stronger affinity for carbon monoxide than oxygen. Maybe the pH of the blood is shifting, causing gas exchange in the alveoli to cease. There are a lot of reasons why this can stop working as it should, and these can be addressed through multiple means. The simplest of these is simply putting a nasal cannula in place to deliver oxygen at a slightly higher partial pressure. Still, there are times when these tricks don’t work and respiration breaks down.

Once the breakdown in the processes of ventilation and respiration take place, a person will begin to struggle to breathe. The work of breathing increases, and the patient has to put in more and more effort to get a breath. This is extremely tiring. Sooner or later, the person becomes too exhausted to breathe, and slips into what is called respiratory failure. When this sets in, there are again numerous things that can be done to assist the person in breathing. BiPAP and CPAP are two ways to do this. However, if these measures don’t work, or if the person can’t breathe on their own, then someone or something has to breathe for them.

In the short term, a device called a bag valve mask allows medical personnel to breathe for the patient, but this isn’t a long term solution, nor is it very useful for delivering higher levels of pressure to the gases involved.

Ultimately, a person who is not breathing well on their own will wind up with a tube down their throat and a machine called a ventilator doing their breathing for them. This can be done because the person can’t keep their airways open when they are unconscious, like during surgery. It can be done because they have significant damage to the nervous system, for example a broken neck has damaged their phrenic nerve, are simply too tired to breathe, like during an asthma attack, and for a host of other reasons.

Here is a recent, real-life example. Steve is a known IV drug user who was found in his backyard by EMS. He is breathing with grunting, low volume respirations that are clearly ineffective. EMS tried giving him Narcan, but it had no effect, so they began ventilating him with a bag valve mask. Since he still had a gag reflex, they were unable to intubate the patient.

The doctor in the emergency room decides that he needs to be intubated and placed on a ventilator because he is simply incapable of maintaining and protecting his own airway. The staff gives him etomidate to sedate him, rocuronium to paralyze him, then the doctor inserts the tube before a respiratory therapist places him on a ventilator. The process is fast, taking less than 5 minutes.

The drugs used to place the tube will wear off in just a few minutes, so the patient needs to be sedated to keep him from fighting against the ventilator. Drugs like Versed, Propofol, Ketamine, and Fentanyl are used to keep the patient sedated. Of course, those drugs cause side effects that must also be dealt with. It becomes a delicate process of keep the patient sedated to the correct level while also maintaining the other parameters, as well as dealing with the drug overdose and the issues that it caused.

In the above case, the patient had rhabdomyolysis, liver failure, kidney failure, and a host of other issues that had to be dealt with. Dealing with those issues takes time, but unless a patient is breathing, time is what you don’t have. Ventilation buys you that time to deal with it.

There are COVID (as well as influenza and pneumonia) who get intubated to this day. Some make it, some do not. It’s not the ventilation that kills those patients, it’s the sepsis and the immune system’s response to it that kills them. In some patients’ cases, ventilation does more harm than good, but overall, mechanical ventilation is a process that saves thousands of lives per year.

Everyone Knows More than I

It’s been a busy few days. I was at work one day last week, and we were simply overloaded with patients. In our 100 bed ED, we at one point had more than 220 patients. The waiting room saw every seat full, and some people were standing. Wait times were more than 6 hours for some people to even get a room inside of the department. I wound up working for 15 hours, and even then they asked if I could stay the rest of the night. When I pointed out that I still had to work the next morning, they asked if I could come in 4 hours early. I told them that I needed to get SOME sleep, so then they asked if I could come in 2 hours early. I agreed.

When I went in the next day, having only had time for 5 hours’ sleep, a shower, and a change of clothes, the backlog had been taken care of. My first patient of the day was a septic man who had a sore on his abdomen, and didn’t realize that he had a blood sugar of over 500. His A1C was 12.7, and he didn’t even know that he was diabetic.

My second patient was a 60 year old woman that had begun speaking gibberish the night before. The family let he go to bed. When she woke up the next morning and was still doing it, they decided that bringing her in was a good idea. We did all of the stroke assessments initially couldn’t find anything. Still, because of the delay, she was not a candidate for clot busters, so we did an angiogram of her head.

While we were waiting for the results, a new family member came in and began yelling at me, wanting to know why we weren’t doing a bunch of ridiculous stuff that she thought needed to be done. I guess her extensive Google search had recommended a bunch of things that she wanted us to do. I explained to her all of the things that we were doing, but she kept on making requests and went so far as to begin flagging down every hospital employee she saw to make these demands. She started getting really loud and mouthy. I finally had to tell her to wait in the patient’s room or I would have to call security. She came unglued at that point and said she wanted to speak to my supervisor so she could have me fired.

I know you would never guess that she was an Amish Canadian from Norway.

The patient eventually was transferred to another facility for brain surgery to fix the extensive blood clot that was found, but since the delay of over 12 hours meant that there was a lot of dead brain tissue there, her inability to walk or speak is likely permanent, and that’s on the family.

That mess was followed by a parade of people with sepsis, some diabetics, and a host of other issues. One diabetic had an A1C that was over 14, meaning that it was off the chart. He claimed to me that he always follows his diet and always takes his medication. Of course, he is lying. He doesn’t need to lie to me, it’s his feet, eyes, and life that he is playing with, not mine.

Every patient that I had wanted to argue and tell me that I didn’t know what I was talking about. Keep relying on doctor google and see what happens. As for me, all it does is keep me employed.

Assembly Line Medicine

Or alternatively titled: Why I Don’t Watch TV.

Nearly every medical show irritates the piss out of me. That’s why I can’t watch those shows.

Chicago Med doesn’t appear to have any nurses- the doctors do everything.
I saw one show where there was a car accident near the hospital and the doctors ran down the street to the scene, snatched the extrication tools from the firefighters’ hands, and extricated the patient from the car.

This is how it works-

  • the patient comes in and is triaged by the nursing triage team.
  • The patient is taken to an ED bed. The nurse assigned to that bed conducts the initial assessment and orders some basic tests, and maybe even a few medications.
  • The doctor reviews the patient’s chart and orders some additional tests and more medicine.
  • Then we wait for the results if testing and imaging
  • More medications are ordered and the patient is either admitted or discharged

The doctor may appear to see the patient at any point in this process, or may not. There are times when the patient may not even see the doctor until hours after they arrived. It doesn’t mean that the provider isn’t evaluating you- it means that some maladies don’t require him to physically be in the room for most of it.

Not so on TV. On television, the doctors are waiting outside for the ambulance, then they run into the ED with the patient, frantically shouting orders. People see this, and when they come into the hospital are shocked and angered that it doesn’t work like that.

I get at least one patient each day who asks: “So when is the doctor going to come see me? I’ve been waiting for an hour.” In reality, the doctor and I have been in constant contact, you have an IV, blood has been drawn, a CT scan was ordered and done, you have received three or four medications, and we are awaiting the results of all of that testing. It’s remarkably efficient, fast, and maximizes the wise use of everyone’s time.

Even shows about EMS and firefighters is nothing close to reality. I once watched a show where a paramedic needed to deliver a shock to a patient in cardiac arrest, but the patient was lying in a puddle of water. He then placed the paddles on the patient’s chest (paddles are largely a relic of the past) did a handstand on those paddles to get out of the water, and shocked the patient.

I can’t tell you how many times someone has said to me: “Why aren’t you doing X? It always works on Greys Anatomy/Chicago Fire/Rescue 911.” People watch this stuff and think that it’s a documentary.

The few times that my wife tried to get me to watch shows that cover topics in which I have some knowledge, I spent the entire time rolling my eyes and making comments. She doesn’t watch them while I am around any more.

The only thing that all of those shows get right is that there are tons of people who work together that are having romantic affairs. Every hospital seems to have a doctor or two who enjoys diddling the nursing staff, and there are plenty of young nurses fresh out of school who think that they are going to bag themselves a doctor husband, not realizing that they are the fourth or fifth nurse he has bedded this year.

At this point, I just assume that every show on TV is BS. Then there are the people who Google their symptoms or malady and want to know why we aren’t doing what Google recommends, but that is another topic entirely.

Permissive Hypertension

I am going to take this time to explain how strokes are treated in the hospital. I am going to make this understandable to the layman, so there will be some things that get simplified, or even omitted to make this easier to understand.

Strokes are the fifth leading cause of death in the US, so treating them is an absolute must. When people have signs of a stroke in the Emergency Department, the rules say that we have to get them a head CT within 10 minutes. The CT is looking for bleeding in the brain, which is called a hemorrhagic stroke. About one in eight strokes is caused by bleeding in the brain. The other seven are called ischemic strokes and are caused by blood clots.

Immediately after the CT scan is done (the patient is still in the CT imaging room), they are interviewed by a neurologist to see if they are showing signs of an ischemic stroke, meaning one caused by a blood clot cutting off oxygen to the brain. The nurse does the evaluation at the same time, and each of them come up with what is called an NIH score. They then compare scores and, if different, they discuss why. The idea is to give the score that is most advantageous to the patient. An NIH score measures the likelihood and severity of a stroke through a score that ranges from 0 to 42. The higher the score, the more severe is the stroke. A score of eight or higher means that the patient gets screened to see if they are a candidate for TPA administration.

TPA is a miracle drug. It breaks up blood clots, and allows blood to again flow, saving brain tissue from death. If administered within the first 4.5 hours of a stroke first beginning, the patient frequently leaves the hospital with no permanent disability. Sadly, many people with stroke symptoms wait too long to come in and are not candidates for this therapy.

If they are having a stroke, but are outside of that 4.5 hour window, they are admitted and we see just how much brain function they have lost. Then they are discharged to be rehabilitated and taught to live with their new disability.

In 84% of cases, patients who have just had a stroke will see their blood pressures greatly increase as the body tries to use this pressure to force blood past the clot that is cutting off blood to the brain. This process actually reduces the amount of damaged brain tissue in an ischemic stroke, reduces the amount of permanent disability, and decreases patient mortality due to ischemic brain tissue.

The risk of this is that the large increase in blood pressure greatly increases the chances that a blood vessel will rupture, causing a second, hemorrhagic stroke, and that second one is often fatal. I believe that a hemorrhagic stroke is what killed my mother last year.

Since 2019, the American Stroke Association and the American Heart Association both recommend that a patient with an ischemic stroke that isn’t a candidate for TPA administration be permitted to have high blood pressure for the first 24-72 hours after the stroke while being closely monitored. The only high blood pressure to be treated in these cases is a blood pressure higher than 220/120. In those cases, the patient should be medicated to reduce blood pressure by 15%. This is called permissive hypertension and is the current way that hypertension in stroke patients is being treated.

The problem is that this is not received well by older medical professionals, who have spent their lives thinking that “high blood pressure is bad” and want to reduce blood pressure no matter what. They just haven’t remained current in their clinical knowledge, and secure in their ignorance, will violently defend what they have always done, even when that has been shown to be the wrong thing to do.

I recently had a stroke patient with a BP of 263/152 and had formed a plan in conjunction with the doctor to lower her BP slightly to 220/110 using medication. Another nurse (who used to be a charge nurse) came over and started a loud shouting match, telling me that I was being dangerously lazy in not controlling the patient’s blood pressure. She accused me of being a shitty nurse and reported me for poor patient care.

I produced all sorts of studies showing that I was right, so I won’t be getting in trouble, even though the QA department agreed with her, trying to tell me that blood pressures of over 200 are too dangerous. They pointed out that the units on the floor have a policy of not accepting patients with a blood pressure that high. I told them that maybe the policy should be revisited in light of current literature.

Why? Because medicine is evidence based, and the evidence and current literature is on my side. I presented my nursing plan and the current literature to my department head, and she agreed that my treatment was in keeping with current AHA and ASA guidelines.

That required me writing a long dissertation to support my position. It wound up being a 460 word essay, complete with references to the AHA and ASA guidelines, as well as referencing multiple studies carried out since 2020, showing that patient outcomes are better under these guidelines.

It’s cases like this that show why good nurses make a lot of money for the level of education that they have. I’m probably going to present my case to the hospital’s clinical standards council (one of whom already spoke with me and thinks its a great idea) and try to get the policy changed. It’s a stupid policy that is likely killing people. The bonus is that, if I am successful in forcing the change, I get a raise and I also get published.