A MANPAD alert was issued at LaGuardia airport last night. Listen to ATC traffic:

Here is what the FAA has to say about them:

10-2-13. MANPADS ALERT

When a threat or attack from Man-Portable Air Defense Systems (MANPADS) is determined to be real, notify and advise aircraft as follows:

  1. Do not withhold landing clearance. To the extent possible, issue information on MANPADS threats, confirmed attacks, or post-event activities in time for it to be useful to the pilot. The pilot or parent company will determine the pilot’s actions.
  2. MANPADS information will be disseminated via the ATIS and/or controller‐to‐pilot transmissions.
  3. Disseminate via controller‐to‐pilot transmission until the appropriate MANPADS information is broadcast via the ATIS and pilots indicate they have received the appropriate ATIS code. MANPADS information will include nature and location of threat or incident, whether reported or observed and by whom, time (if known), and when transmitting to an individual aircraft, a request for pilot’s intentions.PHRASEOLOGY-ATTENTION (aircraft identification), MANPADS ALERT. EXERCISE EXTREME CAUTION. MANPADS THREAT/ATTACK/POST-EVENT ACTIVITY OBSERVED/ REPORTED BY (reporting agency) (location) AT (time, if known). (When transmitting to an individual aircraft) SAY INTENTIONS.EXAMPLE-“Attention Jet Blue Four Seventeen, MANPADS alert. Exercise extreme caution. MANPADS threat reported by TSA, LaGuardia vicinity. Say intentions.”
    “Attention all aircraft, MANPADS alert. Exercise extreme caution. MANPADS post‐event activity observed by tower south of airport at two‐one‐zero‐zero Zulu.”
  4. Report MANPADS threat/attack/post–event activity via the ATIS and/or controller‐to‐pilot transmissions until notified otherwise by the Domestic Events Network (DEN) Air Traffic Security Coordinator (ATSC).REFERENCE-FAA Order JO 7110.65, Para 2-9-3, Content.
    FAA Order JO 7210.3, Para 2-1-10, Handling MANPADS Incidents.
    FAA Order JO 7610.4, Para 3-1-3, Responsibilities.
Categories: Uncategorized

9 Comments

JoeT · July 22, 2026 at 8:28 am

Looks like some X click bait as there’s zero followup from “Buzz” or anyone else.

SiG · July 22, 2026 at 8:37 am

Good thing that warning was an error. While a military fighter jet may have the ability to out maneuver an antiaircraft missile attack, a commercial air transport jet doesn’t. A 737 or an A320 is not the place to be if one is headed at you. Air transport aircraft like those are heavily optimized for low cost of operation, like good fuel economy.

Old Maine Farmer · July 22, 2026 at 9:08 am

This happened back in the late 1980s at a base I was stationed at, only we were flying A-7s and they just loaded us with chaff and flares and we had jammers. Wouldn’t want to be a lumbering grape and hear that for sure. If it were the real deal one would expect them to totally reroute traffic to another place, not just issue a warning that no airliner could respond to. Happy landing Delta, you might get blown out of the sky in the next 20 seconds. Nuts.

rick · July 22, 2026 at 11:24 am

That pilot tacitly admitted that he hadn’t read the FAR/AIM.

    Diffee · July 23, 2026 at 4:40 pm

    Is it in the FAR/AIM?
    The numbered stuff above is from.the FAA air traffic regs

lynn · July 22, 2026 at 3:40 pm

I’ll bet the Delta 2604 pilot needed new underwear after that little exchange.

Out West · July 23, 2026 at 5:38 am

Predictive programming is now in effect, brace for impact(s).

Comments are closed.