in a hearing for the “Chud the Builder” case, DA Robert Nash said: “Dalton’s abuse of First Amendment privileges is what got us into this mess in the first place.”
Let’s paraphrase:
Sure, you have a 1st Amendment right to Free Speech, guaranteed by the US Constitution, but if someone attacks you because they don’t like your speech, that’s your fault, and if you defend yourself with the 2nd Amendment you belong in prison.
That’s the position being taken by the state of Tennessee. As more information comes to light, it appears as though Fox was the aggressor. He recognized Dalton (Chud) and decided to attack him because he previously used the words “nigger” and “chimp out”
As a result, the court lowered his bond from $1.25 million to “only” $1 million, but then ruled he is not permitted to use the money from a give, send, go campaign because those funds are the result of a criminal enterprise, since he wouldnt have gotten that money if he hadnt tried to murder Fox. Even if he DOES manage to find a donor, he cant be bailed out unless he can prove at a hearing that he didn’t receive the money as a result of his crime.
Uh, he hasn’t been convicted of a crime yet, meaning he is innocent. That being the case, how can these funds be the result of a crime the state hasn’t even proven yet?
What we have here is an attack on the First, Fifth, and Eighth Amendments by the State of Tennessee, and proving Dalton’s point- we have a rwo tiered justice system.
Under this theory, if a person ever says something which offends someone, that person is permitted to physically attack them at any place or time in the future, and if the person who is being attacked defends themselves, they can be denied any Constitutional rights a court sees fit to strip from them.
Or perhaps its only blacks you aren’t permitted to offend.
Remember, the left believes speech is violence if it offends someone.
0 Comments