I guess one of the things that bothered me about the guy who claimed to be a SEAL working on the pile at ground zero was due to the sound in this video: (watch it with the sound on)

Every firefighter wears an alarm that alerts those nearby that a firefighter has been motionless for 30 seconds. The alarm is called a PASS device and emits a loud noise to facilitate finding a downed rescuer. We jokingly referred to it as the “lazy man” alarm. Once you have been motionless for 30 seconds, it emits a soft beeping noise. On fire scenes, you will hear one device chirp, and every firefighter on scene will wiggle to reset the alarm.

The sound in that video is the sound of 343 PASS devices sounding their cry for help, all at the same time. Each of those noises is emanating from a PASS device that it attached to a dead firefighter. That noise gives me chills to this day. Those rescuers each entered the building, knowing that they may not come out. In fact, some of the firefighters who went into the north tower had already seen the south tower collapse, and knew what was going to happen.

They went in anyway.

There are people out there who claim the buildings were downed in a controlled demolition. There are people who claim to have worked the pile, but were never there. They can all kiss my entire ass.

Then, not one of the dozens of rescuers, investigators, or other workers at ground zero would see a thing, or you would have to believe that the ones who noticed were willing to keep it a secret even though many of the dead firefighters were related to those same investigators.

I know people who were both at the towers and at the Pentagon. I was at the Pentagon site afterwards.

Explain to me how:

  • a demolition crew of at least several dozen people could spend several weeks in a building where 50,000 people worked every day and 150,000 people used the building as a transit station, place several thousand pounds of explosives, several hundred feet of det cord, wire all of it for demo, all while having not single person notice and wonder what those guys were doing,
  • Either none of the thousands of rescuers who were there noticed anything, or still marched into the building knowing it was wired to explode. One of them was a Battalion Chief who ordered his own brother into the building. Can you imagine giving your brother an order that resulted in his death? Now tell me why he would then keep it a secret when the government did something like this.
  • nor would anyone of the people involved say a word about what really happened.

In order for this conspiracy to work, thousands of people would have to be in on it. Some of the people who were in on it lost close relatives.

The FDNY’s deployment included:

  • 121 engine companies
  • 62 ladder companies
  • All 5 rescue companies
  • 6 squad companies
  • 27 chief officers

Over 1,000 personnel in all, and more than a third of them perished.

Don’t even claim it was crisis actors. There is no way to get a hundred imposters into a group where everyone knows someone who knows you. Fire Departments are a close knit community. Once you go up in rank, you know people. There are classes, seminars, conferences, etc. Firefighting is a family business. There are brothers, sons, fathers, cousins, and even wives and daughters who work in that community. To think that 343 people would die in a building collapse, all of whom were friends and relatives of those in the fire service still living, and not one of the living would say a word? That’s simply unbelievable.

That battalion chief I talked about earlier? Battalion Chief Joseph Pfeifer, the first FDNY chief at the World Trade Center. He survived. The firefighter killed was his brother, Lieutenant Kevin J. Pfeifer of Engine 33. You can see him here in the white shirt and hat in the only known video of the first plane striking the towers:

Engine 33 was only 1.5 miles away from the towers and was one of the first to arrive. Joseph ordered Kevin’s company into the North Tower to help evacuate occupants; Kevin died when it collapsed. Here he is in the National Geographic documentary on those first responders. Watch this and imagine your pain in sending your own brother in to die:

Now picture a building wired with demolitions. Every firefighter there would have know- you can’t secretly wire a building that large for demo without it being obvious.

One wall in my game room is filled with department patches and pictures of people who I know in the fire service. Even today, my wife is amazed at how we will go some random place and some firefighter will walk up to me and say hi. I’ve been retired for more than 15 years, yet I still know and talk to people who work in the fire department- including from New York, Maryland, Virginia, and I live in Florida. In fact, I know people in departments all over the east coast and beyond. We were in Fairbanks, Alaska in 2017, and ran into a firefighter I knew from Maryland.

There is no way that you could pull something like this off without at least one firefighter saying something.

Sorry, dude. I trust people that I have known for decades more than some Internet rando doing a pseudo analysis of a youtube video who then sets up a webpage where he claims to have solved the crime of the century. Any engineer or architect who tells you they can prove it was a controlled demo from watching a video is full of shit. If this were the case, why wouldn’t that same government simply have eliminated whoever it was? A government that killed 3,000 people in front of the entire world would be too squeamish to eliminate the guy running that website and destroy his “evidence?”

This is the same government that couldn’t even keep it a secret when a President got a blowjob in the Oval office. Anyone who seriously believes this hasn’t thought it through.

It’s easier for me to believe one of the following than it is a controlled demolition:

  • The government was completely inept and just dropped the ball by not knowing what was coming
  • the government knew something was afoot and screwed up by allowing it to happen, like they did in OKC
  • the government knew what was going to happen, but allowed it to happen for some unknown reason

If you believe this bullshit about a controlled demo, you are a moron and are spitting on the graves of people I knew and respected. There is just no other way to put it. Not everything that happens is a government conspiracy. Don’t dishonor dead people who gave their lives to save others by calling them liars.

EDITED TO ADD:

I’ve shown my work here. Going forward, please refer to rule 6 of this blog:

If you demand that anyone provide evidence for an assertion that they are making, then you must hold yourself to the same standard when making a counterargument. It takes time and effort to research sources, and replying with “Nuh, uh, I refuse to believe that” while not providing sources of your own to refute them is how an 8 year old debates. If you demand that the person with whom you are disagreeing show their work, so do you.

Categories: Uncategorized

27 Comments

TCK · September 13, 2026 at 3:42 am

I never thought about it back then, but in recent years I find it suspiciously convenient that the self proclaimed elites were handed such a perfect excuse to push the tyranny they’d been dreaming to implement. It doesn’t need to be a controlled demolition with pre-set charges. Merely allowing an attack they saw coming to happen.

After all the bullshit of the scamdemic and it’s lockdowns, and the zealotry with which the so-called “experts” have forced Fauci’s poison-jab on the rest of us, can you say with a straight face that it’s “impossible” or a “conspiracy.”

Or is this matter an exception to your previous uses of the “our government would never do that” face?

    Divemedic · September 13, 2026 at 6:42 am

    It’s not that the wouldn’t do it. They couldn’t do it, as outlined above.

    Exactly what are you claiming happened, who knew what, and what evidence is there to support controlled demo? The building fell too quickly? COVID? Thats the best you have?

      TCK · September 13, 2026 at 3:02 pm

      I specifically said that I DIDN’T think there was any kind of “controlled demolition,” just that it was awfully convenient for certain parties that the CIA (effectively an arm of the deep state) backed and trained terrorists got as far as they did.

      TCK · September 13, 2026 at 3:05 pm

      ” COVID? Thats the best you have?”
      Have you been ignoring the news for the last 3 years? It has been proven beyond any reasonable doubt that Covid-19 was engineered in a lab being directly funded by the deep state. And then it “escaped” that lab at a VERY convenient time for said deep state.

      But what do I know. All good and patriotic Americans know that our government would never do something like that.

        Divemedic · September 13, 2026 at 4:28 pm

        COVID is not in any way related to this discussion. This is the last post I will allow that attempts to shoehorn COVID into a discussion about 9/11, which happened 20 years earlier.
        Furthermore, I won’t allow any more unsupported conspiracy theories on this. Have evidence? Present it, but you are using the same style of argument as the TikTok moms who claim the husband actually killed Lindsay Clancy’s kids.

        Back your assertions with actual evidence, or you might as well claim the moon is made of cheese.

nones · September 13, 2026 at 5:07 am

I was just reading yesterday about “Building 7”, a building that collapsed into it’s own footprint as if it was a controlled demolition. No one ever talks about that. Is it even true?

    Divemedic · September 13, 2026 at 6:43 am

    Same thing applies. How would you rig a busy building for demolition and no one noticed a thing?

      oldvet50 · September 13, 2026 at 11:20 am

      I posited a plausible method earlier, but you chose not to publish it.

        Divemedic · September 13, 2026 at 12:04 pm

        I dont want conspiracy fanfic. Post evidence. The standard isn’t “Can I devise some conceivable way this could have happened, no matter how far fetched?” It’s “What observations are better explained by this hypothesis than by the alternatives, and what independent evidence demonstrates that the hypothesized events actually occurred?”

        On the response you received, the answer to that second question is explicitly: none offered.

    Birdog357 · September 13, 2026 at 8:36 am

    All of the WTC buildings shared a common foundation. That foundation was compromised when the largest buildings to ever collapse, fell down. It also had fires burning uncontained for 12 hours. Falling into it’s own footprint is not at all outside of the realm of possibility.

Charlie · September 13, 2026 at 6:08 am

There’s a documentary out about first responders talking about what happened that day, that you might find interesting. It would be interesting to hear your thoughts about it, actually. It’s called The Responders: Breaking the Silence, you can watch it on YouTube, Apple TV..

DaveH · September 13, 2026 at 7:05 am

Something none of the “demolition” people ever mention is that most explosives stink.
Very distinctive odor. If the building was rigged, most of the survivors would have mentioned it.

Building 7? The twin towers had an isolated “bathtub” subbasement but there was a lot of common shared basement area too that extended out to the whole complex. The falling of the towers would have caused a large pressure wave.

    Birdog357 · September 13, 2026 at 8:38 am

    Not just the pressure wave, but the entire complex was built on land fill. And the towers falling caused a local seismic event. Landfill does extremely poorly when the ground shakes.

OldToolFool · September 13, 2026 at 8:24 am

Amateur blacksmith here. This was the conspiracy that always drove me crazy. Great demo about the what steel does at heat. The comments are a trip. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzF1KySHmUA

Seamrog · September 13, 2026 at 9:17 am

I do not believe the Twin Towers were controlled demolition, not by a long shot. Two fuel-filled jetliners smacked them and we know the tragic and awful results.

WTC 7 and the Pentagon I do not have any certainty about. I do not claim to know how they were affected, but I know it does not make sense, and the more we learn about how extraordinarily evil our government actually is, I put NOTHING past them.

There is not one thing about WTC 7’s collapse that matches what would be expected from a fire-caused failure of structural steel. The Twin Towers absolutely do match. 7…not so much.

I saw the video of the chirping alarms several days ago and could not stomach it. I honor the men who ran into that disaster out of duty and likely knew what they were facing, and willingly did it anyway. My family and I were in NYC for my daughter’s sweet 16 when they were still removing rubble from the cratering holes where the Towers were. Daughter and wife wanted to shop so I saw a bar down the way and told them to meet me there. It happened to be a ‘firefighter bar,’ where I guess they frequented. Patches literally everywhere, from all around the world. One of my most favorite and vivid memories spending a couple hours in that bar. Hope to go back one day if NYC ever turns around.

Gerry · September 13, 2026 at 9:33 am

FDNY HazMat, NYPD Emergency Services, US EPA ERT and the FBI HMRU were all my customers back then. If it was a set up it was a big surprise to all of them.

I did not go to the site, but did some training for the people at Fresh Kill who sifted thru the debris, looking for body parts so they could use DNA to identify remains.

It still plays with my head. I don’t watch anything about 9/11

Jason · September 13, 2026 at 10:00 am

Just some back of envelope scribbling on my part. I have always wondered why no one said anything about the physics aspect of this; to wit:

1 – WTC 1 and 2 were built in the late 60s and finished in 70 and 71 respectively.
2 – Construction took place in an environment that included salt water fog, mist, etc. Steel (to include rebar inside of concrete used) does not play nice in salt environments. Example: my old Dodge Dart turned into a rust bucket in Pacifica, California where there was never any salt applied to the roads (no snow) just ocean mist and fog.
3 – Between building finish and 9-11 was a period of 30 years for the salt to do its thing.
4 – Cracking open my old physics textbook, I did some calculations based upon the weight of a 767 (412,000 pounds) and probable speed of impact (460 mph):

The math worked out to this:
a – Impact force was equal to roughly 7,546,000,000 foot-pounds (that’s billion)
b – Mass conversion would have been roughly 7,543,000,000 pounds (billion again)
c – The g-force of the dynamic deceleration was roughly 53,900 g

The above would indicate why the energy of impact is the likely cause of structural weakness that eventually caused the buildings’ collapse. This would be in addition to any salt caused weaknesses during the prior 30 years.

By the way, doing the same method with regard to the Pentagon plane would seem to demonstrate why no big pieces of that aircraft were found at site. That plane was also hitting stone verses aluminum/steel so the impact result was likely higher.

Note: I have no theories regarding who did not show to work, mystery passports, and the like. Example – the photo of a steel I-Bean that appears to have been cut at an angle may be nothing more than a dynamic sheer caused by thousand of tons of stuff dropping on it.

Note 2: My math may be off but I ran it a couple of ways with roughly the same result.

Just my 4 cents (inflation don’t you know) here….

    Abe · September 13, 2026 at 8:18 pm

    I have yet to see anyone publish the calculated weight of the buildings above the fire weakened steel and the results of that.

Old Maine Farmer · September 13, 2026 at 11:43 am

The twin towers had a new design structurally; at the time it was a big deal. It allowed more open spaces with force flowing through main beams instead of the whole structure as well. I think the design failed the test.

My question is why we didn’t see this as an attack on the US by Islam, which it was? We could have retaliated by obliterating Mecca within 24 hours and bulldozing all Mosques here in the US, and any complainers could have been deported. If it had been handled the right way, no Iraq or Afghanistan wars, no Iran war, no Muslim mayor of NYC. But then that is why I am a farmer and not a politician now.

    Divemedic · September 13, 2026 at 12:13 pm

    My proposed solution would have been cheaper in lives and treasure: Go to Congress and ask for a letter of reprisal detailing a $500 million dollar reward for Osama Bin Laden dead or alive. $50 million for anyone else in AL Qeada’s senior leadership.

Himself · September 13, 2026 at 1:17 pm

I’d add to your analysis a corollary to Murphy’s law; The bigger the organization and the more people involved the larger the chance that some screws up or blabbers.

One of the dumbest theories I heard was that it was a missile that hit the pentagon, based on the lack of wreckage (false) and the CCTV video that just shows a shiny streak and not a plane. Utter redardation. Worse, actually, because they are thinking in today’s time, not 2001.

I drove past the pentagon on that road every day for work. I had friends and family that drove it that day. A friends brother was a firefigher on the scene afterword, and has pics of him there. I saw news footage. There were bits of plane everywhere, including the landing gear. The pentagon is built from stone blocks, nearly 2′ thick. The wreckage looked just like a plane barreling into mountain. More importantly, my late brother in law was a former SEAL that worked for a military contractor whose office was in crystal city. He was looking out the conference room window while waiting for his boss and saw it. BTW, if there were any funny business, he’d have been among the first to drop dime.

Most importantly, having been in the business back then, and now – CCTV cameras back in the day were like 480p, with a frame rate of 30 FPS (frames pers second). Think of a frame as a still image. A jet traveling at 400 mph is going nearly 600 feet per second. So you are talking what? Maybe there are 3-4 frames, tops with the plane in it, that in that second the frame was taken moved 600 feet? That’s why the blurriness, that’s why the streak.

Mike Hendrix · September 13, 2026 at 4:36 pm

“Then, not one of the dozens of rescuers, investigators, or other workers at ground zero would see a thing, or you would have to believe that the ones who noticed were willing to keep it a secret even though many of the dead firefighters were related to those same investigators.”

They also regularly, and pretty frequently, ran bomb-sniffing canines through both buildings, and the dogs never triggered one time. So-called 9/11 Truthers are one of the main reasons we can’t have nice things anymore.

    Divemedic · September 13, 2026 at 6:21 pm

    I am not saying the government didn’t know or even participate in 9/11 (either through deliberate nonaction or active participation). However, there is no- and I mean zero- evidence that this was the case. However, there are reams of evidence that none of the buildings were brought down with demolitions, no is there any evidence there were missiles fired into buildings, nor any evidence of crisis actors.

    People who claim otherwise without evidence just diminish the credibility of anyone who dares question any other facet of the government.

Grey Mobius · September 13, 2026 at 4:55 pm

What Birdog said. I remember on Thursday or Friday after the towers fell, John Liauzeau (sp?) of Controlled Demolition Inc described how the towers fell in the terms of the mechanics involved. Tower 2 hit low and on the edge leaned past the center of gravity then collapsed. Tower 1 hit high and more centered pancaked, with the inertia of the upper floors taking out the intact structure. Building 7 had a massive fire and its construction had limited vertical support over some massive tanks under the rear. It pancaked too. No conspiracy involved just gravity.

If there was conspiracy, it’s why our g-ment knew about these bastards and didn’t a damned thing to stop them.

Capt. Rick · September 13, 2026 at 5:28 pm

As for all of the armchair experts that claim that “jet fuel won’t melt steel” I have seem a LOT of offshore oil rigs that have had fires and there are plenty of melted beams. I’m not sure, but I bet that jet fuel burns hotter than crude oil.

    Cato · September 15, 2026 at 2:12 pm

    Especially when that jet fuel is burned with atomised aluminum and iron oxide in the mix, which would produces traces of thermite.

Mikey · September 14, 2026 at 12:44 pm

I’ve been a volunteer firefighter now for about three years. Very familiar with PASS devices. Almost comical watching everybody do a little boogie back and forth whenever someone hears one start to chirp.

That video is haunting. Damn.

Comments are closed.