Prepare for Violent Weekend

According to SCOTUS blog, the Supreme Court announced that it will be taking the unusual step of releasing an opinion on Friday.

Expect the Dobbs and possibly the NY Pistol decisions being released on Friday. If this happens, stand by for riots and violence this weekend.

Hahaha

The Columbus Police Department, having solved all other crimes, is unveiling the gay police car.

As soon as I saw this, the only thing that I could think of was this:

Here are the new Columbus police uniforms.

Hint: That isn’t a breathalyzer he is asking you to blow.

Getting Help

Back in 2012, I posted about something from my past that applies to the whole “red flag” debate. I’m going to repost it here.

2003

Three minutes after the initial call to 911, we arrived at
the front of a small, well-kept house, a typical one for the area. There
are toys scattered about the yard, undoubtedly left there by a small
child.

The first through the door, I arrive in a rush and take in
the scene. Even now, nineteen years later, that image is burned into my
memory as clearly as if it were yesterday. There is a small child lying
on the couch in the living room, a small pitiful figure, his skin is a
mottled gray. He is covered in water and appears lifeless.

An adult male is standing next to the couch. He is soaked from the waist down, his clothing disheveled; his eyes red-rimmed, he looks like a wild man. I will not find out that this man was the child’s uncle for
another fifteen minutes.

I pick up the child, and he is cold. He does not stir, even when I harshly pinch his arm. I move to the door to the safety and privacy of the truck.

On the way out to my ambulance, I quickly look him over. He is about three years old, 12 kilos or so. Lying lifeless in my arms, he doesn’t appear to be doing very well. He isn’t breathing and has no pulse. My mind already computing drug dosages and accessing protocols, I reach for my radio and called in a “code” to the dispatch center.

I place my lips over the child’s mouth, and give gentle breaths. Chest compressions. Breaths.

We arrive at the truck, and I select the proper sized ET tube, and slide
it down his throat. My partner begins squeezing the bag, and I start an
IV.

I place him on the monitor, and I note that he is in asystole. Not good.

I spent the next 40 minutes fighting the battle that I knew we had lost before we even arrived.

As the helicopter flew away, taking with it the small, pitiful body once
so full of life, so precious to all who knew him, his Uncle approached
and asked me what he should tell his brother. He wanted to know how to tell a man that his baby boy drowned in a backyard pool while his Uncle took a shower. He then put his head on my shoulder, wrapped his arms around me and cried for the next ten minutes.

I went back to the station, numb. I didn’t know what to feel. All I knew was that I was empty, spent. In the weeks that followed, I had a harder and harder time going to work and functioning. I finally told my supervisor, who referred me to CISM. I was in therapy for that call for a while. It was hard to deal with. I even took anti-depressant medication for about 6 months. It was tough living with the ghosts of that call. I still get teary eyed sometimes when I think about that day, about what I could have done differently. Normal reactions, I think, to such a tragedy.

There are those who would deny me the right to own a firearm because I feel pain at the loss of a child. They wish to see people lose their rights without a hearing or a trial, simply because they sought help when they needed it. Millions of Americans seek therapy, take anti-depressants, and own firearms. None of them killed anyone yesterday.

No, they claim that being depressed at the thought of holding a dead child, at failing in the attempt to save his life, at having to console his mourning caregiver is an abnormal reaction that makes you a potential homicidal killer who needs to be stripped of his rights.

Those same people argue that it is completely sane for a parent to hire a doctor to surgically remove a child’s penis, because that child says he wants to be a girl today, even though that same child believed that he was a robot yesterday and a T-rex last week.

They argue that you can hire a lawyer, go to a hearing, and fight to try to get your rights back. The easier answer?

Suffer in silence.

Isn’t that what they claim is wrong with forcing trannies and fags to stay in the closet?

Am I Crazy?

I’m going to sound crazy here, but follow this line of thought from my comment over at GFZ.

In the years from 2006 to 2011, the ATF deliberately allowed guns to fall into the hands of Mexican drug cartels. Known as Operation “Fast and Furious,” it was an apparent Machiavellian plan by the Obama Administration to make gun violence along the border to bad that the American people would demand more gun control. This single operation proved that the left generally, and the Obamas specifically, were willing to sacrifice US lives to further their goals and objectives.

If you had predicted all of those things back in 2019, I myself would have called you a nutcase.

It certainly looks like the left will kill millions in order to get and retain power. Do I think that all of this was a planned series of events? No. Do I think that they took advantage of the events to their benefit? Yes.

So now we know just how far the left will go to pursue their goals. They will lie, cheat, steal, and kill. With that in mind, lets consider that during his election campaign, Joe Biden made a number of campaign promises. He promised to:

Now take a look at today’s post from GFZ. How many headline grabbing mass shootings have there been in the past 90 days? How many happened in the preceding year?

Am I crazy? Or is this simply a continuation of the crazy that has been happening for the past 3 years? It is enough to make me feel like I have stepped through the looking glass into some alternate reality story written by a schizophrenic writer of bad pulp fiction novels.

Jesus, I am starting to sound like Alex Jones.

Plot Hole

These two women don’t spend a single word denying that they were attempting to steal an election. Instead they complain about people asking questions and being angry for being called out.

The president of the United States is supposed to represent every American, not to target one.

What about James Crowley?

George Zimmerman?

So how about we stop deflecting and get to the real question- what WERE you doing in that video?

Boyfriend Loophole

There is a lot of talk nowadays about the so-called “boyfriend loophole” as they relate to red flag orders. I was a victim of a woman who tried to hang me with a domestic violence accusation. This happened back in 2014. In her complaint, she alleged:

  • that we lived together (we did not)
  • that I was stalking her (I was not)
  • I showed up at her workplace (I did, but not while she was there)
  • which led to her getting fired (It did, but not because I had done anything wrong or illegal)

She got my first name and my address correct, but had used the wrong last name*. The court granted her a temporary Domestic Violence Restraining Order.

Her legal complaint never alleged any violent act or even threat on my part. I was going to ignore the whole thing, since it wasn’t my name on the order, but my lawyer advised that we fight it to avoid issues down the road. So it still wound up costing me over $2,000 in legal fees. You can read about the entire story here and the resolution here.

Even though we could prove in court that she lied (I never lived with her, even though she said I did) there were absolutely no ramifications to her lies. Had there been a law allowing her to get a DVRO from a person she was only dating, I am convinced that I would be a prohibited person to this day.

There is no limit to the lengths that a woman who feels slighted will go to in order to get revenge on her ex. If it means lawfare, so be it. They will do it without hesitation.

* The last name thing is pretty funny. When I was on Facebook, I used a false last name, because I didn’t want people from my work to be able to read the politically incorrect things I was saying. She filed for the DVTPO using my fake Facebook name. (Shows how well she really knew me.) Anyway, she got the address and my first name correct, so a Deputy pulls up to my house and says, “Are you Dive Medic?” I reply, “Yes.” He hands me the TRO and tells me that I am under a restraining order and drives away.

Insurance

I lost the genetic lottery. Let me explain.

  • My father was a type 2 diabetic. He died 18 years ago at 63 years old.
  • My grandmother was a type 2 diabetic. She died 50 years ago at 63 years old.
  • My grandfather died at 56 years old in 1948. It could have been diabetes, but there was no real testing for that back then.
  • You can trace it back. My great-grandfather died at 47 years old, his mother died at 57 years old.
  • My sister has diabetes. My brother does not.

So genetics are working against me here. I was diagnosed with diabetes about 12 years ago, while I was in my mid 40s. I went on a diet and lost 90 pounds. That was good enough to manage my diabetes for the next 6 years.

As you may or may not know, diabetes is a progressive disease. Those with it know that it will progress eventually, and I am medically knowledgeable enough to know that it will likely be what kills me at some point. I am just committed to making that date as far in the future as I can. So I watched what I ate, stayed active, and kept up doctor visits.

At any rate, it was about six years ago that my blood sugar began climbing. My A1C was right around 8. So the doctor put me on Metformin. The doses slowly increased, another drug was added. Still, my A1C stayed pretty good, wavering between 6.5 and 7.5.

My levels slowly have been increasing. Last September, my A1C was up to 7.8. Then in April, my A1C was as high as it ever has been: 10.0. The doctor tested my blood to see if I was still making my own insulin, and I am. So we talked about a few options.

One option is to stay the course. That is the worst of the choices and, considering my family history, will lead to a death within a few years. Not a good choice.

The second option is insulin, meaning that I would have to inject myself at least once per day. There are a lot of drawbacks to that plan, and isn’t much better than option one. I’ve seen for myself that type 2 diabetics don’t do well or last very long once they go on insulin.

The third option was to try one of the new drugs: Trulicity, Ozempic, Rybelsus. The one we decided on is Trulicity. The catch? The drug costs $800 to $1,000 a month. None of the others are any cheaper. My insurance company says that they won’t cover it unless I can prove that I am a diabetic who has tried other, cheaper options, and those options don’t work. The Dr wrote the prescription.

Of course the insurance company kicked it back and demanded more documentation. We provided it. According to their own website, I fit the criteria.

The doctor just called me. The insurance company denied it anyway.

I have some calls to make to try and take care of this. I don’t think that I have any legal recourse, so I have to review my options. It is stuff like this that makes me believe that insurance companies should be liable for malpractice.