Failed Economy

The world’s largest bank, JPMorgan, has stated that attempts of Ukraine reconstructing their infrastructure have a 67% chance of failure. Of course, the MSM doesn’t want to hear that. They make plainly biased statements like this one:

[JPMorgan] was essentially wagering against the same Ukrainian agency that has consistently defied institutional expectations.

That statement is not only biased, but reliant on other nations continuing to borrow money that they don’t have, so they can continue to use it to bolster a failing Ukraine economy. Since the war began, the world has donated an amount equal to two years’ of Ukraine’s pre-war GDP. Since the war is only three years old, that is quite a large sum of money. I imagine if someone making $50k a year needed to borrow $100k over a three year period so they could pay their bills.

In the meantime, the nation is having its industrial and farming base systematically blown to smithereens. The only way that is going to be rebuilt is with LARGE amounts of free money. I agree with JPMorgan- any investment in Ukraine is likely to be lost.

The US isn’t far behind. Canada has been the largest of the central banks selling off US treasuries since the first of the year. In fact, just the month of January saw foreigners selling a net $13.3 billion of U.S. notes and bonds. That comes after $49.69 billion was sold in December, following sales of $34.41 billion in the month of U.S. elections, November. Before that, Central Banks had been buying for 15 straight months.

While dumping treasuries, central banks across the world have been selling before using the funds to buy gold. De-dollarization isn’t a new idea, but has taken a life of its own after the U.S. froze Russian assets. Central banks added 1,045 tons to global gold reserves in 2024, exceeding 1,000 tons of gold purchased for the third straight year. That’s why gold prices are surging. It seems that Central Banks are thinking that the US dollar isn’t the safe haven that it used to be.

With other nations, particularly China, in the middle of dumping US treasuries, the Fed is bolstering the dollar and attempting to keep the interest on the debt low. They are doing this by buying US treasuries, in other words, they are monetizing the debt- printing more money in order to pay the bills. The Fed purchased $43.6 billion in 30-year bonds during the second week of May alone.

Of the $37 in US government debt, the Fed holds about an eighth of it- 12%. The US government owns about 20% of that debt, mostly because they have to repay what they “borrowed” from the Social Security Trust fund. In other words, there is no trust fund, because they already spent it all.

The Fed is playing a game here- they are buying Treasuries when inflation is low, then selling them when inflation is high. This allows the country to pay back the debt using inflated dollars. Of course, we continue to borrow and spend at a rate that is higher than the Fed is monetizing it. That means it is in the Fed’s (and our government’s) best interests to have high inflation. Why? It allows them to spend more money, which is how they simultaneously buy votes and make themselves rich through graft, corruption, and kickbacks. As our debt gets larger, expect more of this.

That’s why the DOGE team found so much wasteful spending, yet weren’t able to get either party to cut any of it. For example, the US paid $10 million a year to fund circumcisions in Mozambique. Why are we paying for that? The powers that be claim that it’s to prevent the spread of HIV. That’s crap. For one, it isn’t in the US interest to pay for medical care for other countries, and for another, you can assume that most of that money is being wasted or redirected. We are borrowing ourselves into the poorhouse to pay for medical care for an African nation with money that we don’t have.

Yet when Elon Musk and DOGE found dozens of examples of wasteful spending, the members of both parties couldn’t find it in themselves to cut that spending. This is why Musk finally quit. His quote on Social Media was “I tried my best.” All it did was make him hated by half the country, while not doing a thing. The only thing you can conclude from this, is that the Republicans are just as crooked as the Democrats. They are all stealing us blind.

So what does all of this mean? It means that the nation’s economy, followed by its government, is going to collapse. I’ve been saying that on this blog for nearly the entire 18 years of its existence and was saying it to others for years before that. In fact, my econ professor in college, an avowed socialist, gave me low grades on a few papers for making those same claims in college papers.

Anyone who thinks that this fiscal ship can be righted is simply deluding themselves. This nation’s economic ship is going down like the Titanic, and the only question remains is what will replace it. History shows us that the new government will result in far less freedom and will be far more Orwellian, a result of the people who have lost their bread and circuses demanding that daddy government step in and restore their freebies.

Food for thought.

Security

My wife reported to me that a salesman was going door to door in the area. When he rang the bell after ignoring the “no soliciting” and “no trespassing” signs, she saw him on the doorbell camera and didn’t answer.

A neighbor reported to us that they did open the door for him, but once they heard him pitching to them, they told him they weren’t interested and asked him to leave. Instead, he stayed and argued with them.

I’m not sure how I would deal with this, because so much depends on his actions and attitude. However, there is a good chance that he will be proned out at gunpoint when the cops arrive. Why? Because ignoring the sign and ignoring my instructions to leave are called trespass after warning. You can use non deadly force against trespassers. Pointing a firearm at someone is, by law in Florida, NOT deadly force, as long as you don’t tell them you will shoot, kill, or injure them. Something like “let me see your hands, get on the ground.”

Whether or not he would be encouraged to prone out with high velocity objects would depend on his actions.

Financial Repression

Global wealth manager UBS has released a report that says the government may make its growing debt more manageable by turning to additional financial repression measures that would artificially lower the yield on government bonds. The way that this works, is the government wouls be deliberately keep interest rates low and allow inflation to rise to devalue the government’s debt by paying the debt with inflated dollars.

This strategy lowers the interest rate on the debt, and makes it easier to pay the debt by making the interest rate on government debt lower than the rate of inflation, which allows the government to pay yesterday’s debt with today’s lower valued currency. This is yet another hidden tax, as savings and other assets denominated in dollars lose value to inflation faster than they gain value from returns.

“For a country as large and wealthy as the US, widespread financial repression seems feasible and could enable the government to continue financing a growing debt burden without materially increasing its risk of default.

Financial repression policies could be deployed temporarily to provide fiscal breathing room, allowing for budget consolidation and improvement, followed by a phase-out and a return to more conventional policy settings. In such a scenario, economic distortions should remain temporary and manageable.”

Yeah, right. When has the government, any government, instituted a temporary emergency measure that allowed them to spend more money? Once this begins, you will know that the fiscal ship is sinking. Physical assets that you control are the key to navigating this particular issue.

Hard times are a comin’

No One Is Coming to Save You

Ten states and the District of Columbia are violating the Constitutional rights of their citizens by banning so-called “assault weapons” and the majority of SCOTUS doesn’t care. The 4th Circuit concluded that assault weapons are not protected by the Second Amendment’s right to bear arms at all “because, in essence, they are military-style weapons designed for sustained combat operations that are ill-suited and disproportionate to the need for self-defense.”  But even if the Second Amendment does protect the right to have assault rifles, the court continued, the law is still constitutional because it “fits comfortably within our nation’s tradition of firearms regulation. It is but another example of a state regulating excessively dangerous weapons once their incompatibility with a lawful and safe society becomes apparent, while nonetheless preserving avenues for armed self-defense.” 

Where do the words “self defense” appear in the Second Amendment? The continued inventing of phrases by our courts that is done to justify whatever violation is popular that day is a travesty. That travesty is compounded by the fact that leftist Comey-Barret is again siding with the Democrats, and that Kavanaugh is again showing that they have photos of him at Epstein island or at a Diddy party, because his occasional lapses seem like he is being controlled. No matter the reason, out courts are displaying the total lack of regard for anything but political Kabuki.

Viewpoints

I know this story is 7 years old, but it displays an important point. A 17 year old was burglarizing a woman’s house and set off her burglar alarm, which alerted the 54 year old homeowner of the break in. She called police while rushing home, and arrived before the police to find the burglar climbing out of a window. She confronted him, he attacked her, she shot and killed him. Police ruled that the shooting was self defense. I won’t comment on the details or legality of the shooting, as there just aren’t enough facts in this article to say either way. (Although I think it is important to note that I can’t find where charges were ever filed.) What I want to concentrate on is what the man’s mother had to say:

“You have to look at it from every child’s point of view that was raised in the hood,” said Harris. “You have to understand… how he gonna get his money to have clothes to go to school? You have to look at it from his point-of-view.”

This is why your average negro isn’t capable of living in a high trust society. They look at things through what THEY want, and have no capacity for considering the needs or property of others. If they want something, they take it, property rights of other people be damned.

News

To clear out some tabs, here are some news stories from around Central Florida:

A new Florida law will allow people to pay some bills with gold and silver coins. People who do so will not have to pay sales tax. This really doesn’t help anything. Let me explain. Silver’s melt value is $33.60, but one ounce coins cost $43.24, a 29% markup. The sales tax is only 7% to 8%, so you are losing out. On top of that, you would owe capital gains taxes to the Feds on any increase in the value of the coin between buying it and when you used it to pay a bill.

A man in Polk County, Florida was swimming in a Lake when he was bitten by an alligator. When police arrived, he grabbed a pair of garden shears and attempted to break into a police cruiser to steal a firearm before being shot by deputies.

People in Tavares are leaving guns in their unlocked cars, and thieves are stealing them. This is the time of year for car break ins, because high school students are out of school, bored, and looking for things to do. Don’t leave a gun in your vehicle, especially an unlocked one.

The local press is breathlessly posting that ride share drivers like Uber and the like are sometimes carrying guns. Note that the police ticketed and towed the car, not because of the gun, which was returned to him, but because he didn’t have permission to pick up fares at the airport. The left wing media is more concerned with a man carrying a gun with a permit and operating a ride service without a permit than they are for people entering the US illegally.

Last Call

Those professions where death is a part of the job have developed complex rituals for honoring those who have made the sacrifice. The military and the fire department are two of those that I had the pleasure of serving in. You show your respect to the departed by performing the ritual as perfectly as possible.

If you want to see a hundred manly men break out into tears, attend one of those services. For me, it is the fire department last call. Having spent a combined 30 years in the uniforms of the military and the fire department, I attended perhaps a dozen line of duty funerals. The ceremony goes like this:

The deceased firefighter’s truck is taken out of service. His crew spends an entire day emptying the hose bed, cleaning the truck, and draping the insignia and emergency lights with black bunting. His gear is placed in the front passenger seat. When the funeral is over, the casket is loaded into the hose bed of the truck for the ride to the graveside.

A radio and speaker are setup at the graveside. Dispatch calls the missing (dead) firefighter over the radio:

  • <Tones sound for station 14>
  • Dispatch to firefighter 143.
  • Dispatch to firefighter 143.
  • Dispatch to firefighter 143.
  • “No answer from firefighter 143. Let the record show that 143, firefighter John Smith answered his final call at 1410 on this date. For over ten years, he provided dedicated service to the people of this city. Rest easy brother, we have it from here.”

Then a bagpiper located behind the crowd begins playing “Amazing Grace” as he walks into the distance, the music fading with him. A bugler follows that with Taps. At this point, there is not a dry eye in the place.

I spend my memorial day remembering those who gave their lives in the service of others. I was honored to serve and work besides some of the greatest people that I have ever met, with more than I care to remember having given their lives in the service of the people of this nation.

No greater love hath man, that he who would give his life so that another might live.

Separate but Equal

A black Texas legislator wants to bring back segregated schools. This would fly in the face of Brown v. Board of education.

I’m betting that she isnt talking about allowing schools for whites only.