Divemedic

In the recent Bundy affair out west, many conservatives have had a field day, complaining about the so-called First Amendment zones that the BLM set up, to restrict protesters to certain pre-approved areas. I have seen multiple bloggers complain about the policy, and then cite Obama as the bad guy.

Welcome to the party. As far as I know, it was the Bush administration that started the practice of restricting protesters to certain areas. I had a problem with it then, and I have a problem with it now. If protesters can be restricted to certain areas, then those protesters can be ignored by simply not going near that area.

I don’t think that is the idea behind the First Amendment at all.

The Democrats, as evidenced by the Obama administration countering a possible Russian invasion of the Ukraine by having the State Department Tweet out a ‘Selfie’ are clueless when it comes to countering people intent on performing violent acts.

This comes as no surprise to me. This has been the plan that Democrats have had here in the US for years. A person tries to rob you? Just give them what they want, and they will go away, but whatever you do, do not resist with violence, you will only make things worse.

Maybe the State Department will next advise the Ukrainians to pee or vomit on themselves as the Russian Troops cross the border.

The problem with laws that are passed to make us safe, is that this can be used to justify nearly anything. For example, safety is cited when police ticket people $280 for throwing a football at an NFL tailgate party.

A Rhode Island state senator recently told an Infowars reporter to go fuck himself after the reporter asked whether the senator knew what “shall not be infringed” meant with regards to the Second Amendment.
The senator released an apology of sorts after the video of the expletive went viral. The apology gives us a larger view of the senator’s true colors: 

At the end of a press conference in which I participated,
an individual representing a website notorious for conspiracy theories
started berating members of the coalition and intimidating elderly
veterans, members of the clergy and victims of violence.

It quickly became a highly charged atmosphere, which required the
presence of the Capitol Police. The individual in question is not new to
the State House and is known for his aggressive and intimidating
manner. He also was interrupting legitimate members of the media who
were attempting to conduct interviews.

After watching him antagonize an elderly veteran he swung his camera
my way, which produced a very human and guttural reaction. I respect
both the Second Amendment and the First Amendment. It is important to
note that the individual in question was physically removed from a
committee room by the Capitol Police later that evening.

Regardless of the emotions and atmosphere of the moment, it does not
justify the language I used that day. Out of respect for the decorum of
the State House and the constituents I represent, I offer my apologies. (emphasis added)

 You hear that? Only certain members of the media are considered to be ‘legitimate’ and anyone not on the approved list deserves to be told to go fuck themselves, and will be removed from the capitol by the armed guards of the state.
The First Amendment applies to everyone, you dickhole. A US government that forgets that may soon find itself being reminded why the Second Amendment is not to be infringed. Were I a Rhode Island voter, I would do all in my power to ensure that this douche nozzle lost the next election.

These kids are incredible. They are brohters, and the banjo player is only 9 years old.

I drive a Dodge Challenger with the 5.7L Hemi. One of the first things that I did when I bought the car was to have the exhaust straight piped. This makes the car fairly loud, and for this reason, people often think the car is going faster than it is.
Periodically, I have people (always women) yell at me to slow down. The conversation usually goes like this:

Woman: “You should slow down. The speed limit here is X.”
Me: “How fast do you think I was going?”
Her: “Too fast.”
Me: “Are you a cop?”
Her: “You need to slow down.”
Me: “Go fuck yourself.”

I have been told that I am being rude. I agree. However, when another person appoints themselves as the monitor of my behavior, my attitude of “you’re not the boss of me” kicks in, and I tell them to stop. While rude, I don’t think it is out of line.
The stopping distance of my car from 30 mph is 23 feet. The stopping distance for a minivan from 20 mph? 25 feet. Why? Because I have
Anyway, just who appointed you to be the traffic monitor?