#news One of the Lindsay Clancy jurors said she did not consider any of the points the prosecution made in the trial – not one.#massachusetts Reporter: Did the prosecution make any points you considered? Paula Devlin: No.
If you talk about jury nulafaction , they normally kick you off the jury
Jester
· September 14, 2026 at 8:40 pm
Sickening, but hardly new. Introduce emotions and agendas and justice is denied.
Big Ruckus D
· September 15, 2026 at 12:01 am
Ah, and the Lone Juror™ nullified their nullification. Nicely done. Us dissident types like to discuss jury nullification as a force for good, and I fully agree with the concept. But we need to remain aware of the fact that the opposition will co-opt the same tactic for dishonorable reasons. And you can bet your ass this will be happening a lot more, now that the concept is receiving mainstream discussion.
Divemedic
· September 15, 2026 at 4:38 am
Woke juries?
As the system begins to fail, the cracks will become wider.
Tom762
· September 15, 2026 at 3:25 pm
Jury nullification is for bad law, RICO, asset forfeiture, most gun law, etc. It is not to legalize the murder of children. They were not nullifing, they were being bitches. They deserve to be brought up on jury tampering charges for what they have done to the hold out!
Tom762
JimmaJoe
· September 15, 2026 at 7:09 pm
Good explanation!
Divemedic
· September 16, 2026 at 5:26 am
Ah, but the jury gets to decide what a bad law is. When jury nullification is taking place, some decisions are going to be unpopular with a segment of the population. So yes, good laws will occasionally be nullified right along with the bad ones, and juries will let murderers walk occassionally.
Landroll
· September 16, 2026 at 4:23 pm
Not a lawyer here but I don’t regard this as jury nullification. Had all twelve decided her innocent then that title would apply because she could not be tried again for the murders. Still a travesty. Hand salutr to the lone juror and a fickle finger to the other eleven.
Here is a case of a woman who decided that, because she had a gun, she was going to chase down what she believed was a criminal and be a hero. The story goes like Read more…
I said yesterday that the AWFLs would drop the attacks on the Lone Standout after discovering he was black. It turns out that I was wrong. They will protect their own even more so than Read more…
This post is late because it’s concerning the Lindsay Clancy trial. I wrote and scheduled it before the mistrial was declared. I decided to postpone it so I could do some edits. This is the Read more…
8 Comments
Wilson · September 14, 2026 at 7:19 pm
If you talk about jury nulafaction , they normally kick you off the jury
Jester · September 14, 2026 at 8:40 pm
Sickening, but hardly new. Introduce emotions and agendas and justice is denied.
Big Ruckus D · September 15, 2026 at 12:01 am
Ah, and the Lone Juror™ nullified their nullification. Nicely done. Us dissident types like to discuss jury nullification as a force for good, and I fully agree with the concept. But we need to remain aware of the fact that the opposition will co-opt the same tactic for dishonorable reasons. And you can bet your ass this will be happening a lot more, now that the concept is receiving mainstream discussion.
Divemedic · September 15, 2026 at 4:38 am
Woke juries?
As the system begins to fail, the cracks will become wider.
Tom762 · September 15, 2026 at 3:25 pm
Jury nullification is for bad law, RICO, asset forfeiture, most gun law, etc. It is not to legalize the murder of children. They were not nullifing, they were being bitches. They deserve to be brought up on jury tampering charges for what they have done to the hold out!
Tom762
JimmaJoe · September 15, 2026 at 7:09 pm
Good explanation!
Divemedic · September 16, 2026 at 5:26 am
Ah, but the jury gets to decide what a bad law is. When jury nullification is taking place, some decisions are going to be unpopular with a segment of the population. So yes, good laws will occasionally be nullified right along with the bad ones, and juries will let murderers walk occassionally.
Landroll · September 16, 2026 at 4:23 pm
Not a lawyer here but I don’t regard this as jury nullification. Had all twelve decided her innocent then that title would apply because she could not be tried again for the murders. Still a travesty. Hand salutr to the lone juror and a fickle finger to the other eleven.
Comments are closed.