Antigun

The left wants us to work with them on gun control. Leaving aside the fact that their definition of compromise is for us to give up some of our gun rights this year, so they can come back next year to take more of them in yet another compromise, why would I want to work with them when they are saying this about me?

These anti-Americans chucklefucks support murdering kids. Dead kids aren’t deal-breakers for compromising on gun reform. If dead kids aren’t deal-breakers to improve gun laws, that means guns are more important to them than the lives of children. Ergo, they support dead kids.

How about no.

Your move.

A study published this week by the Kaiser Foundation says that 1 in 5 people in the US has a family member who has died after being shot. This is a survey pretending to be science. Let’s do the math. I will even be kind and use the Kaiser foundation’s numbers. (FYI: The Kaiser Foundation is a lefty anti gun pseudoscience think tank)

Averaging the data they publish for the past 21 years, they claim that the annual firearm death rate in the US was 10.75 per 100,000. That equates to 225.75 people per 100,000 over the past 21 years. Or in other words, one person in 445 has died a so-called “gun death” in the past 21 years. Even if you assume that each person killed is from a unique family, for 1 in 5 people to have had a firearm death in their family would mean family sizes of 89 people. The math doesn’t stop there.

The average family size in the US has remained stable at 3.1 people. The statistic is impossible, even if you count grandparents, siblings, cousins, and more. The entire study is pseudoscientific garbage.

Here is another member of the NBA, calling out American gun owners because so many people have died after being shot in the USA.

Why don’t the NBA players, owners, and coaches ever call out China for the 1 million Uyghurs that the CCP is in the middle of killing? Or the citizens of Hong Kong that were massacred?

Will Smith is notoriously antigun. He has repeatedly said that he hates guns and the gun culture.

So it comes to me as no surprise that he wants to eliminate people with whom he disagrees.

Will Smith wants to cancel all Trump Supporters…but I think it’s best we cancel this Communist Pig. pic.twitter.com/xcBkUZCoCA

— Liz Churchill (@liz_churchill9) April 5, 2023

They are becoming bold enough to finally begin saying the quiet part out loud. They want to take your guns, and then they want to cleanse you from the country. Scratch any antigunner, and you find an authoritarian that wants to eliminate anyone who stands in their way.

Will Smith is a cuckold who let his wife sleep with other men because she wanted to.

On why they decided against monogamy, Will explained: “Jada never believed in conventional marriage.”

So it’s obvious that, although he wants to eliminate people whose politics don’t agree with his own, he isn’t going to be the one to kick in doors. He isn’t coming to take your guns, he can’t even keep his wife from screwing other dudes.

Don’t ever forget that Republicans were nearly as anti-gun as the Democrats. They had to be dragged against their will into supporting gun rights, and they will sell us out as soon as they think it will benefit them.

George W Bush had a pretty extensive gun ban section to his campaign platform in 2000. Don’t forget that. Keep the heat on them.

Nutty mental case anti gun assholes are on Twitter right now trying to confuse people on the difference between an AR15 and an M4, because it has come out that the Nashville shooter and her mother were anti-gun warriors.

Saying things like

Does putting in a modified trigger group for a better trigger pull in an M-4 make it not an M-4? Also, also, the M-4 IS an AR-15. M-4 is the military designation for a specific build of AR built by Colt. The M4 is not full-auto. That would be the M4A1 and it’s later models.

So I argue: “Wrong. The M-4 is the full auto version, and is by legal definition a machine gun. So is the AK-47. Yes, the platforms look the same, but looks aren’t the same thing. It isn’t just a ‘modified trigger group for a better trigger pull.’ You are either ignorant or dishonest.”

I don’t think that it is a coincidence that the shooting happened when it did, nor that the army of antigun PR folks is so on the spot with everything.

I just get so tired of arguing against the same old, tired bullshit arguments that they have been making for over 30 years, being dishonest because they know most people don’t know any better. I just want to say “No. Your move.”