Just Pay Them

Meet Herman Grim, who was just awarded $2,055,383 from New York State. Why? Because black people failed an objective test called the National Teacher Examination more often than other races. Mr. Grim failed “many times.”

The assumption made is that black people are just as intelligent and well educated as other races, including Asians, Hispanics, and Whites, even while objective test after test proves that this is not so. Still, it isn’t politically correct to believe these tests, so the only possible explanation must be that the tests are all biased against blacks. Therefore, the state has to pay black people because they are obviously not incapable of learning.

Grim said he’s in disbelief but the money can’t come fast enough because he’s racked up serious debt on his Queens home and credit cards. He couldn’t recite examples of why the test was biased. But Grim recalled hiring private tutors and studying for it during the early 1990s, before failing many times.

In all, this lawsuit cost the taxpayers of New York $225 million.

Nope, math is racist. The SAT is racist. Exams are racist. Credit scores are racist. There, I fixed everything.

Doesn’t Count

People keep pointing out that New Zealand and Australia banned virtually all guns and haven’t had a mass shooting since. I have pointed out that this is bullshit for years, and now we have yet another mass shooting in New Zealand to prove that they are lying.

A man in New Zealand killed 2 and wounded 5 before being found dead. The way that Australia and New Zealand compile statistics, this shooting isn’t considered a homicide because no one was convicted for the killings. The law there requires that someone be convicted for killing another for the crime to count as a homicide.

Laser Weapons


I would find out how much damage a 5 watt laser would do to a camera’s CMOS or CCD. You can buy one for about $400. That camera would be transmitting video of my house only until about 5 minutes after the UPS guy delivers my new purchase. I bet that he runs out of cameras before I run out of photons.

Or you could always call the cops, but it wouldn’t be as much fun.

In Florida, such an act would be illegal under 784.048:

A person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows, harasses, or cyberstalks another person commits the offense of stalking, a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083.

Freedom of Association

When I have get togethers, there are rarely black people there. So? I only have a few black friends, but I also don’t have many friends that I hang out with on a regular basis. There is no law that specifies that I need to practice affirmative action when I decide with whom I will associate.

The vast majority of black people that I know are people that I work with. I don’t spend time with people from work. It’s just a bad idea to mix your social and professional life.

I hang out with people with whom I have common interests. It is very rare that I have anything in common with people who are not like me. Still, let’s address your claims:

I don’t like you. I would never hang out with someone like you, because we have literally nothing in common, and I despise all that you are. Not because you are black. No, I despise you because of who you are. Each of the following is a point against you, and in total makes you someone that is on the verge of being my enemy:
  • You are a lawyer.
  • You are a liberal communist
  • You are a West Coast Anti-gun California Liberal
  • Literally EVERY Tweet you send out calls out whites for being racist and keeping black people down, yet you are an attorney college professor with multiple graduate degrees who is making six figures while pontificating about how the white guy working at McDonald’s should be paying you reparations for something that happened long before either of you were born.
  • Which makes you a racist piece of shit who has already decided that I am a racist enemy of yours.

Church of England Calls God Misogynist

The archbishop of York says that the language in the Lord’s Prayer might be “problematic” for some people because the words “Our Father,” which open the prayer that Jesus taught when his disciples asked him how they should pray is too patriarchal.

Yep, the fact that the Bible itself teaches that man was made in the image of God is wrong, according to a major Christian church. Now we are at the point where churches themselves are protesting against the very God that they worship and the book that they claim was written by him.

Police Substations

The new hotness among governments in light of the Bruen decision is expanding places that are off limits to carrying concealed weapons. Make the entire city a special carve out of areas that are sensitive, and therefore off limits to carrying concealed weapons, and you can back door your way into a general gun ban.

It isn’t a new concept. Disney tried it by claiming that their license to import fireworks made the entire Orlando theme park complex off limits, and Universal Studios claimed that the presence of the “Digital Audio Visual Effects (DAVE)” college on the grounds of their studios made the entire theme park that was on the same property off limits to carry.

For the last several years, the one that appears to be spreading in Florida is the “Police Substation.” It works like this: a business agrees to let police sit inside of their establishment to do paperwork and take a break, and in exchange they get to put stickers on the entrance claiming that “This is a police substation for XXX police department” and viola- the business is now a police station and is thus off limits for legal concealed carry. The Lauderhill Mall is doing it– so is the Central Baptist Church in Sanford. The Westgate mobile home park in Largo has allowed police to use one of the vacant trailers on the property as a substation. Many hospitals are doing this as well. I have seen at least three of them in the past six months that have posted signs just like this.

I can’t find an answer in the statutes or in any Florida case law on this. Is a business location off limits to carry if they allow police officers to occasionally use a portion of the property as a resting or public relations base, if the property is primarily used as a business or other location, and the police are usually not there? I am writing emails to several prominent attorneys who do firearms rights advocacy to get an answer on this one. Anyone else here have any authoritative information in this?

Figures Don’t Lie, but Liars Figure

In this editorial piece disguised as news and statistics, Yahoo tells us that there are only about only 16.7% of Americans actually own firearms.

the top twenty percent of all gun owners actually owned 55% of the guns. In terms of absolute figures, ten million people owned 105 million guns – for an average of ten guns per person, and the remaining 87 million guns were owned by 34 million people – for an average of 2.6 guns per person. The population of the U.S. was 263 million in 1994 – indicating that only 16.7% of Americans had actually owned a weapon.

So their claim is that 44 million people own all of the guns. That is complete and total bullshit, and I can prove it. Let’s use concealed weapons permits as an estimate of the number of gun owners. Florida alone has approximately 2.6 million active concealed weapons permits. With 12% of all Florida residents having a concealed weapons permit, this would mean that three in four gun owners have a CWP. That would be a very high percentage, indeed.

How many people in Florida have weapons but no CWP? That is impossible to know, but what we do know is that the Florida Department of Law Enforcement conducts 1.5 million instant background checks for firearm purchases per year. The anti-gunners are claiming that all of these firearms are being sold to the same people over and over.

I just don’t see it. It is far more likely that, when called by some random “survey taker” that the person answering the phone either says, “Guns? We don’t have any guns here,” when asked, or they simply refuse to take the survey. I just don’t think that surveys are a reliable means of “research” on any topic like firearms. I might as well take a survey of high school boys, asking them about their number of sexual partners. I’m equally as likely to get an accurate count in either case.

These estimates of gun ownership rates are simple guessing. In fact, the Rand corporation estimates that as many as 28 percent of Floridians are firearm owners, and Florida is outpaced in ownership rates by at least 9 other states. According to that study, rates range from 3.4% in Massachusetts to more than 33% in Mississippi. Even with this method, these “studies” are little more than guesswork.

Just in the 20 years between 1999 and 2019, over 42 million rifles were manufactured (pdf alert). Between 20% and 50% of all rifles manufactured in the USA are AR-15 pattern rifles, including all of the variants like the AR-10, and all of the miscellaneous caliber variations.

What we DO know is that there have been 460 million background checks run through the NICS system since it went online in December of 1998 (pdf alert). Just in the year 2020, there were 39.6 million NICS checks done. Now granted that NICS isn’t a complete count of gun ownership because it fails to capture sales done between private parties, guns stolen from dealers and common carriers, and multiple firearms sold in one transaction. Some sales will likewise be overcounted because checks are occasionally done through NICS for CWP permits that don’t result in a transfer, but NICS is the closest thing that we have to counting the number of firearms transfers in the US. Are we to believe that the number of firearms sold in the US from 1900 to 1998 is only 35 million, when Americans are busy buying more than 30 million firearms a year? Those guns sold in the 1980s aren’t going away. Guns last a long time. I myself own firearms that are over 100 years old.

No, they say. It’s because a few people are busy buying dozens of gun and tens of thousands of rounds of ammunition every year, they claim. The left would have you believe that there are just 34 million people buying those ~40 million guns in a year- more than one per person on average, year after year, while 6 out of 7 Americans aren’t buying any guns at all. Sorry, but that is complete bullshit. I wrote about this in June of 2016, and I guessed at the time that there were somewhere between 400 and 500 million firearms in the US. Since that time, there have been another 219 million NICS checks.

Looking at ammunition sales, American citizens (all civilian sales, including the cops) are buying around 10 to 12 billion rounds of ammunition- about $11 billion dollars worth- in a year. In fact, the American civilian market buys a third of all ammunition manufactured worldwide to all consumers- including the world’s militaries. To put that in perspective, that is more ammunition than was used by the entire US military during each year of World War 2, when the average was just over 10 billion rounds a year and the US armed forces had more than 15 million personnel.

My guess (and mine is just as valid as theirs) is that there are somewhere between 700 and 800 million firearms in the US, and I would also guess that the southeast US is seeing household gun ownership rates that are somewhere near 70%. What all of this means is that, outside of the major antigun metroplexes of NYC, Boston, Baltimore, San Francisco, and LA, more than half of households have at least one firearm, and more than a quarter of those households own at least one “assault weapon.” I would be willing to bet that my guess is closer to reality than the 17% figure that they are waving about. I’m not alone in that opinion. Even in 2016, there were bloggers guessing that there were more than 600 million guns in circulation.

Now I know what you are thinking- you had a lot of guns before the boating accident, and don’t think that millions of “super owners” is out of the question. Keep in mind that those of you reading this are most likely in the “gun culture” and are among the upper 1 or 2 percent of gun owners. I know people who own 100 or more firearms. Still, the most common gun owner has his dad’s hunting rifle in the closet, or a single handgun in his nightstand drawer and hasn’t been to the range in years, if ever. Even in the south, only about a quarter of gun owners regularly visit the range.

If even one percent of the gun owning public decides to respond in kind to being called an enemy of the people, there will be somewhere around 1.8 million people who are armed, pissed off, and know how to shoot. Many of them spend their weekends hitting small targets at thousands of yards, because they think it’s fun. They will not be lined up in neat ranks out in a field somewhere, just waiting for you to nuke or drone strike them.

The US police cannot even begin to control the gang problem in our inner cities, and the membership of those gangs is only around 800,000 or so and the gang members aren’t actively hunting cops, no matter what the cops try to claim. This is a fight that cannot be won, but they don’t care because liberals are not the ones who will be getting killed. Or so they think. That is dangerous thinking indeed. The people of each side who are the least stable will be the ones who decide when the violence begins and how far it goes.

Lawsuit

If my employer made me sit through a lecture where I was called a racist simply because I am white, I would leave that training session and be sitting in a lawyer’s office within the next 24 hours.

In this class, Ms. Shackelford is teaching a roomful of white people that not only are all white people racist; they will always be racist, or as she so eloquently put it, white people will always be “subhuman-demons.”

Normally, I would say “So what?” Except that one of the names that is being bandied about as a future President is a black woman who has this to say about white people:

There are white people who are not as powerful as the system of white people — the caste system that’s been put in place — but they still, no matter where they are on the rung, or the ladder of success, they still have their whiteness […] (Whites have a) leg up.

You still have your whiteness. That’s what the term ‘white privilege’ is. It means that whiteness still gives you an advantage, no matter. It is the fundamental issue.

Who is this person? Oprah-

White privilege is the concept that Jayden Smith, Sasha Obama, and these children of billionaires are some how at a disadvantage when compared to me, because I am white. Nevermind that they are obscenely rich and the children of American royalty, the color of their skin makes the difference.