Two people posted memes to different target audiences during the 2016 campaign. The memes were nearly identical in every way: they encouraged people to vote by sending a text message containing their candidate’s name. This way, the meme alleged, you could avoid waiting in long election day lines. The only difference between the two was the voting block that they were targeting. One targeted Trump voters, the other targeted HRC voters.
These two people posted the exact same tweet. One was a Democrat and one was a Republican. Guess which one was just found guilty in a NY Court? Guess which one still has her tweet up but was not charged? @DOJ#Tyrannypic.twitter.com/sf9Ja5buox
Hey 🇺🇸Trump Supporters🇺🇸! Skip poll lines at #Election2016 and TEXT in your vote! Text votes are legit. Or vote tomorrow on Super Wednesday! pic.twitter.com/ES34HV0yad
We have two different legal systems. One jails people indefinitely for trespassing, the other gives people a pass for blinding people with lasers while they burn down Federal courthouses. One jails people of one political faction for doing the exact same thing that they ignore from the other political faction.
The entire Federal legal system has been weaponized. The FBI is investigating people who oppose the Democrats, the IRS is auditing reporters who write damaging articles, social media has been completely subverted, and we are on the verge of being a police state.
As bad as that is, things are going to get worse. Much worse. Just wait until the disappearances begin.
I had a pro-2A friend of mine say that we should support the left’s right to 2A, and if we don’t, we are part of the problem. I disagree. I think it was Tam over at “Books Bikes and Boomsticks” who once said that there is a difference between open carrying and open carrying AT someone.
When you are openly stating that you want to use your 2A rights to attack someone for merely disagreeing with you, that isn’t how the 2A works. If you want a war, then I am not interested in being fair. I am interested in winning. With that in mind:
There is nothing like posting a picture of yourself with an illegal SBR while openly advocating for a terror attack. I’m sure the FBI and ATF will be all over this.
Or not. And just so we are clear, here is a picture of one of the “christcucks” that was killed by a deviant, delusional tranny this week. Tell me again how they deserved this, you deviant assholes.
This is Pastor Chad Scruggs and his daughter Hallie Scruggs. Hallie was brutally massacred along with 3 of her classmates at a Christian school in Nashville by a radical transgender activist.
That evil piece of shit targeted a Christian school filled with little kids and unarmed adults because they were defenseless and had no security. You want a fight, then let’s do it. I don’t want one, and I think it would be a disaster for everyone, but better that, than watching you massacre little kids.
Edited to add:
I'm to the point that if it takes a civil war to get the guns out of the Republican hands and to end the @NRA once and for all, SIGN ME UP AND PUT ME IN ON THE FRONT LINES!! We CANNOT sit by anymore!! I'm ready and willing to go. Time to save our children while we still can….
The Nashville shooter’s Facebook page had this photo on it:
For all practical purposes, we are in a shooting war. Nutbags like this one are the canaries in the coal mine.
Chances of favorable outcome of political efforts is very doubtful. This situation, coupled with statements of the left, along with movements and violent actions carried out by their forces indicate in my opinion that a surprise aggressive movement in any direction is a possibility at any moment. Take all necessary steps to safeguard yourselves and families. Hostilities can begin at any time or place without warning.
After every mass shooting, it’s inevitable. Republican lawmakers share hollow “thoughts and prayers,” while they refuse to offer much more, often buoyed by thousands of dollars in dirty gun lobby money. They call for mental services they themselves won’t fund. And they blame anything but the guns themselves (even doors!).
Monday’s mass shooting at a Christian elementary school in Nashville, Tennessee, was no different.
Following the shooting in his state, Tennessee Governor Bill Lee appealed to “please join us in praying for the school, congregation & Nashville community,” offering no idea, for instance, of how to achieve a reality where constant prayer and hollow thoughts are no longer needed.
His uselessness is unsurprising, given the large role he has played in making it easier for mass shooters in his state to access guns. In 2021, Lee signed a bill that allowed people to openly carry handguns without permits; the policy was at the forefront of his legislative agenda for the year. He proudly thanked the National Rifle Association “for helping get this done.”
This shooting was intended to send a message. It is political violence, a terrorist attack by definition. It’s an act of war.
I missed a couple of days because of work obligations, and it appears as though I was too late to say most of what needed to be said about this video because other blogs beat me to it.
I do, as you would expect, have a couple of thoughts to add that perhaps others haven’t thought of.
This idea comes along all the time from anti-gunners- the idea that a militia armed with AR-15’s can’t fight a government armed with tanks, fighter jets, and nukes. The most obvious retort to this, is that this argument only makes the case that the 2A applies to tanks, jets, nukes, and especially MANPADS, ATGMs, and other heavy weapons. (If you don’t want 2A to apply to nukes, I am sure that you would have no problem getting an Amendment passed to that effect.)
No, the less obvious answer is that a militia isn’t going to be relegated to a confined field of play, as if war was some sort of spectator sport like football. The more likely continuation of the above video is that Staff Sergeant Jeremiah Walker leaves his bunker from a long day of shooting drone launched Hellfire missiles at NRA members like Andy Baker and gets in his car to go home. When he gets there, he discovers his 12 year old son in bed in a pool of his own blood, his throat slashed from ear to ear. Rigor mortis has already set in. His wife and 4 year old daughter are missing. In the girls bed is a note which reads: “If you ever want to see your daughter alive again, the next Hellfire you shoot needs to hit Senator Schumer.”
He refuses, and redoubles his desire to kill the entire membership of the NRA. His daughter’s body is found in a ditch two days later, his wife is never found. In his rage, the distraught Staff Sergeant begins randomly firing Hellfires into right wing neighborhoods, killing dozens of people, some of whom may actually have been gun owners, most were not. The father of one of those killed is the vendor who sells pork to the base mess hall. One day, about a month after the daughter’s death, the Staff Sergeant is eating in the mess hall when he finds his wife’s engagement ring in his pulled pork. Tests confirm that the “pork” is a match to his wife’s DNA. The butcher is never caught and is currently wanted by the FBI, who believes that he has joined the growing underground resistance movement.
Two weeks after the arrest warrant is issued, the FBI is distracted by another case at the Norfolk navy base when 140 sailors die after someone added a deadly bacteria to a shipment of lettuce that was bound for the USS Gerald R. Ford’s mess facility. The entire US military is ordered to begin eating only MRE’s or canned food manufactured more than 6 months ago. Morale plunges with food quality, and the government soon realizes that they have less than 90 days of “safe” food supplies for themselves, even after confiscating all canned goods nationwide. Citizens in large cities begin having food riots as most people can’t get more than 900 calories a day. The food just isn’t there.
Civil wars get ugly. Bosnia. Rwanda. Rhodesia. Kosovo. Even the American Civil War. The US civil war, as a percentage of the US population, was the bloodiest war in American history. In 1860, the US census measured the population at 31.5 million people. Six to ten million were killed and wounded. That means the war killed and wounded 20 to 30 percent of the nation. If a conflict with similar casualty rates were to occur today, we would see about 40 million killed and another 30 million wounded in direct hostilities, and another 60 million dead from disease and famine. With casualty rates like that, societies break down. Medical systems stop working. Famine, disease, and poverty reign.
The secret here is that the government is scared. Every senior government official saw exactly what we saw- nearly 400 cops being held at bay by a single teenaged loser with an AR-15 because they didn’t want to get “clapped.”
Then they realize that the nation has well over 100 million gun owners, many of them veterans, who like to see how fast they can shoot things that are as far as a mile away. For fun. They remember the two losers who shut down all of DC by creating a sniper’s hide in the trunk of a car. How can they trust a police department to protect them when the shooting starts? This scares them, which is why there was a division of troops airlifted into DC in the days following J6.
And before those on the right get too smug, don’t be thinking that the military will automatically refuse orders to kill civilians. History is filled with examples of militaries that gleefully slaughtered their own citizens when ordered to do so.
No, the most likely outcome of a civil war is for some people, and some military units, to take one side in the conflict, and others to take the other. Then there will be those who are nominally on one side while feeding information to the other. It’s the kind of conflict that starts with a few thousand and soon sees everyone choosing sides. Picture a US Civil War, part 2 where a third of the nation is dead or incapacitated within half a decade.
That’s something that is truly frightening to me, and something to be avoided at any cost short of abject despotism. It is also an outcome that seems more likely every day, because there are those on both sides that seem to desire it.
With the news that law students and faculty at Stanford Law School shouted down a visiting appeals court justice, preventing him from delivering the speech that he had been asked to give at the school, we see that even prestigious law schools don’t want to hear from anyone from the other side of the political aisle.
Couple that with faculty and students being attacked by a virtual lynch mob of other students because of their political beliefs, I just can’t see any other possible result on the horizon than the outbreak of outright hostilities.
The ever increasing animosity and violence has been ramping up for years. Reminiscent of the period before the Civil War when fistfights erupted on the floor of Congress. Outside of Congress, people would attack and beat their Representatives in the street.
Even Politico sees the parallels between now and the 1850’s. The difference here is that Politico is blaming the right for the violence, and using the attack on Paul Pelosi as evidence. Of course, we know that the Pelosi attack was his gay lover attacking Pelosi. Even if you DON’T believe the gay lover story, there is no evidence that the attack had anything to do with politics.
Even in the days before the American Revolution, there was violence. Keep in mind that in those days, those who lived in North America were all of the same country. That didn’t stop British soldiers from raping and killing local women. Colonists would tar and feather tax collectors before burning down the tax collector’s house.
Wars between citizens of a same country are especially bitter because of the similarities between combatants. Like a couple that has been married for too long, each party knows how to hurt the other, and they do.
In the current day conflict, we are seeing an extension of the conflict of the Civil War: does one side in a political debate have the power to force the other side to do their bidding? The Civil War was one of country farmers in the south versus the industrial city dwellers of the north. The south didn’t have the industrial base to win the war. In today’s case, it will be the country and suburban counties versus the heavily populated cities. Will the cities have the industrial base to win?
Who knows, but the last Civil War was the bloodiest we have ever had. The next one will be even worse.
The Capitol police are calling Tucker Carlson a liar because they claim that he was cherry picking video footage when he claimed that the events at the Capitol were a peaceful protest. They also claim that he released video that might contain security secrets, even though video of the same locations was released to the public as a part of the Trump impeachment hearings.
Legacy media is no better at truth telling than the Soviet Pravda. Today we learn the truth: the Q-Anon Shaman was escorted around the capital and let into the Senate chambers by police. He even praised them for their hospitality. pic.twitter.com/AExUn5hzru
First, the left claims that J6 was a violent uprising while continuing to call riots by the left as being mostly peaceful because “The first amendment doesn’t go away when a single person sets a fire,” and, “Destruction of material is fundamentally different from violence.” The article mentions that 500 people have been convicted of crimes, but most of them were for nonviolent things like “parading” or “trespassing.”
The fact that Republicans are jumping on the bandwagon is a telltale sign that they are not in our corner. They will sell out the American people in a heartbeat if it means maintaining power and wealth.
Ray Epps Lied in His Sworn Testimony to the January 6 Committee, and Surveillance Footage Proves It
"Epps testified that when he sent the text messages to his nephew, he had already left the Capitol grounds to return to his hotel room. That is not true." pic.twitter.com/Hcae3GIsiM
Schumer accused Speaker Kevin McCarthy of treason after giving Tucker the tapes. Treason is one of the crimes defined in the Constitution. Article III, Section 3, Clause 1 of the Constitution defines treason as:
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
So are we to understand that Schumer considers the people are the enemies of the United States?
