Uncategorized

Remember the Port Orange teacher that disrupted standardized testing? He actually posted a video of himself as he did it. He rambled on for nearly an hour.

Watch the video. It’s a long, rambling video that makes it seem like the teacher is on drugs.

He tells the kids (4:54 mark of the video) that black students are the victims of racism. He brags about smoking weed (at 14:47) even claiming that he sometimes comes to work stoned. At 15:22 one of the kids tells the teacher that he smells like weed sometimes. Another student admits that his mother smokes weed.

At 27 minutes, a Principal arrives and demands that he turn the music off. The teacher wants to have a conversation with him, but the principal leaves after being told the conversation is being live streamed.

He is trying to be a friend to the kids. Dropping F bombs. Admitting to drug use.

Other videos on his Instagram page include his interview with police and a video lasting over 2 hours that appears to be of of himself getting high while listening to music. The video appears to have been shot at 5 am, just before he went to work. In it, he claims to be drinking Patron and smoking weed.

The governor of Colorado recently signed a law that legalizes abortions at any point until birth. Theoretically, a woman in labor could have the baby aborted and this would be legal. I don’t see how that is anything but murder. However, that isn’t the point of this post. Here is a link to the law itself. (pdf warning)

The point here is that the law reads (in part):

A FERTILIZED EGG, EMBRYO, OR FETUS DOES NOT HAVE
INDEPENDENT OR DERIVATIVE RIGHTS UNDER THE LAWS OF THIS STATE.

So I wonder how long it will be before a case comes before the court where someone has injured a pregnant woman and caused the loss of her baby. Like the case of Heather Surovik.

Heather Surovik was eight months pregnant when a drunk driver struck her car on a summer afternoon on the outskirts of Denver. A 27-year-old preschool teacher at the time, she was expecting to give birth within days, in July 2012, to a boy she had named Brady. “I survived,” she said. “Brady did not.” To Surovik, that was a homicide. But not according to Colorado law. “I was told that because my son did not take a breath, he was not considered a person,” she said. “He was considered part of my injuries—a loss of a pregnancy.”

This resulted in Amendment 67 being placed on Colorado’s ballot in 2014. The measure was defeated. So in Colorado, anyone can kill an unborn baby. A person can stab, shoot, or run over a pregnant woman, causing the loss of her unborn child, and that loss will be considered an injury.

Even CNN thought that this unborn fetus was a child. CNN host Erin Burnett exclaimed: “That baby was 8 pounds, 2 ounces. He was going to be born in a couple of days. How could you not define that as a person? That is a viable life.” Showing that the left has no concept of cognitive dissonance, this same CNN anchor is in favor of abortion.

I guess this is what the women of Colorado want, although looking at the new law, they are not even women any longer, but are now “pregnant individuals.” The words female and woman do not appear in the new law, not even once.

What do a corrections officer, the son of a city councilman, a Disney lifeguard, and a teacher have in common?

They were all arrested in the past month for attempting to have sex with children.

Must be why so many of them hate Florida’s Parental Rights Bill.

A teacher in Port Orange, Florida began playing loud music during state standardized testing, which prevented students from being tested. He refused to turn it off and was arrested.

I wonder if this was caused by him being pissed off because he can’t talk to kids about sex under Florida’s new law.

Isn’t this a terrorist attack?

First it was our founding fathers who were canceled. Then it was civil war figures. Now it is scientists being canceled for things they did more than 60 years ago.

Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.

George Orwell, 1984

The first thing that came to mind when I read this article was, “$20,000 to be a barber?”

Michael Woods, a special education teacher in Palm Beach County, said legislators and parents are looking for a “solution to a problem that doesn’t exist.”

“Teachers do not go out of their way to create these moments where we’re ‘indoctrinating’ students,” said Woods, who is gay. “If I could indoctrinate a student, it would be to bring a pencil and a piece of paper, and if I was really good at ‘indoctrinating,’ I would be able to get them to do their homework.”

Teachers not indoctrinating? You look at a picture of him in his classroom and tell me what you think he is doing…

Now the lawsuits are arriving about Florida’s parental rights bill. The claim is that it violates the free speech rights of teachers who want to teach homosexuality to 5 year old children.

For the reasons that I discuss in this post, I disagree.

A New York lesbian couple is suing a fertility clinic because their child is a boy instead of a girl. They said of their son:

Heather said she could not bear touching him because it “sent electric shockwaves through me.” She said she also experienced “extreme anxiety” because when she looked at her son, he would “contort into the faces of all these grown men that I know.”

Then there are guns and camouflage.

People say, ‘Oh, he’s a boy, let him hit you,’ and all the camouflage and guns don’t help. It reinforces masculinity,

So how does she feel about her son?

She said she experienced “complex postpartum depression,” including “several incidences of suicidal ideation.”

If seeing her son makes her suicidal because he is a boy, that child needs to be removed from that household.

MIT has decided to resume the requirement for applicants to take the SAT or ACT exams. Other colleges, California state for example, are unlikely to. They claim that actually requiring students to know things is discrimination.

We are truly entering the dark ages.