For so long, the left has wanted to frame gun ownership in terms of hunting. As in: “You don’t need that kind of gun for hunting.”
Now hunting is under attack by “science.”
Categories: Antigun
Antigun
OK, Karen
There is a woman in Michigan who is claiming that her neighbor, who lives 250 feet away and established his own shooting range, has made her go deaf with gunshots and T:annerite explosions. I kind Read more…
3 Comments
Steve S · June 12, 2022 at 10:03 am
1. I followed the science. It led to the money.
2. Yes they’re for hunting. Hunting tyrants.
Brian_E · June 14, 2022 at 10:24 am
Second option, especially for the tyrants that express apparent shock (especially for the cameras) when reminded that the 2nd amendment ensures that we the plebes have the means to throw off the shackles of tyranny and reconstitute a government more in line with our needs.
Don Curton · June 12, 2022 at 4:47 pm
There have been cases where communities banned hunting (even archery, so can’t blame fear of guns) and then turned around and hired so-called professionals to come in and cull the excessive white tail deer population after they had enough car wrecks and destroyed flower beds. In other words, fine for govt hunters to shoot and kill deer, but can’t allow private citizens to hunt.
Comments are closed.