Now they are just stealing ideas from Ayn Rand.
National Labor Relations Board Administrative Law Judge Geoffrey Carter ordered Starbucks to reopen “within a reasonable period of time” two Ithaca locations that closed
Categories: Lawfare
Lawfare
The FBI Says…
Now the FBI has come out saying that the Russians have been funding the right’s social media. This is the start of an obvious effort to affect the outcome of the election. The bureaucracy will Read more…
11 Comments
Vitaeus · September 14, 2024 at 8:17 pm
Good luck with that, hard to require operation. Seizing a working business is possible
joe blow · September 14, 2024 at 9:47 pm
I mean, whats the point of revolution if you don’t have threesomes?!
Xzebek · September 14, 2024 at 10:07 pm
The appropriate response is, “LOL GF”.
Jonathan · September 14, 2024 at 10:07 pm
I’d like to see them leave them closed and drag this out as long as they can.
Preferably while working with the landlord to find another tenant so it becomes a moot point…
lynn · September 14, 2024 at 10:12 pm
Starbucks will appeal that ruling. It will go all the way to SCOTUS. Starbucks will not be forced to unionize. I do not know what SCOTUS will do in the future, maybe a decade in the future. I am not sure what even today’s SCOTUS will do.
However, one thing though. SCOTUS does not like judges outside the federal court system.
TCK · September 15, 2024 at 1:40 am
I love how the article includes a quote from a snowflake who referred to a business closing a couple already unprofitable locations as “really brutal and aggressive union busting.” It kinda makes me want to bring back the Pinkertons so I can see the looks on his and his comrades faces when a squad rolls up to their ‘take over protest’ with some truck-mounted potato diggers.
Anonymous · September 15, 2024 at 7:06 am
Isn’t that indentured servitude?
Noway2 · September 15, 2024 at 8:59 am
The idiots unionizing and those protesting both need to understand that the real minimum wage is ALWAYS zero.
SiG · September 15, 2024 at 9:10 am
Can the so-called judge make them charge the same prices for coffee as every other shop in town? Can they raise their prices to cover new expenses with the same percentage profit?
If the judge makes them keep their current prices with increased expenses, they go out of business. If he allows them to raise prices, they can be raised enough so they go out of business.
Exile1981 · September 15, 2024 at 10:40 am
The one snowflake complaining that his anti-starbucks social media posts were why he wasn’t hired. Duh, every employer has a right to look at your public statements and if your statements are against the employer why would they hire you? Seriously you would reduce noral, be a negative impact and a potential risk that you would do things to get the company in trouble.
IcyReaper · September 15, 2024 at 11:15 am
The real issue here is in reality he cant do it. How can you force a business to stay open and loose money? They cant operate like a .GOV agency.
BUT under the new rules of the Judiciary, judges can do anything they want to. Think about that.
Now really THINK about this from another angle. forget about the single coffee shop issue or North Dakota abortions or other shiny attention grabbing bullshit issues.
You have all these lower court judges around the country making clearly illegal decisions, it goes to SCOTUS and they shut that down. Once you get enough of overturned shitty decisions, Then the Demo Commies say we just have to change SCOTUS,to protect Democracy of course. And of course the compliant and ignorant sheeple will support it…….
Comments are closed.