Divemedic

This performance is stunning.

Government benefits are intended to, according to the government, “help disadvantaged people,” but how disadvantaged are these people, really? Let me use my sister as an example. She is a single mother in her early thirties that has two children by two different fathers. She lives with her current boyfriend, who is not the father of either of her children, as well as their two roommates: the father of her first child, and his current girlfriend.
She is my sister, and I love her, and while I cannot condone her lifestyle, it is her life. The biggest problem that I have is their financial state, and the fact that they are being funded my tax money in the form welfare dollars.
You see, she works as a waitress at a local chain restaurant, and makes quite a bit of money when you count her tips. She takes home about $70-100 a day in tips, most of it as unreported income. If you talk to her, she will tell you that this is because she doesn’t get a paycheck, because taxes take that from her. I reply that I pay far more than that in taxes, and she is getting off easy by not reporting all of her tips.

Her boyfriend makes $12 an hour at his job, but since they are not married, this does not affect her reported income when it comes time to apply for government benefits.

Their roommates include the father of my sister’s first child, and his girlfriend. The two of them pay my sister $300 a month to live in the third bedroom of the apartment. My sister’s two daughters share the second bedroom.

What this means is that my sister and her boyfriend have an after tax income of about $3500 a month. That equates to an income of over $50,000 a year for the couple. She and her boyfriend have annual passes to Universal Studios, and they go out for drinks and dinner 2-3 nights a week. Now I certainly don’t have a problem with that. What I have a problem with is this:

She collects welfare, food stamps, reduced school lunch for the kids, and lives in a government subsidized apartment. In total, she also receives another $900 a month or so in government benefits. This means that her little family takes home about the same amount of money as a family that earns about $64,000 a year.

How is that disadvantaged? This amount of money puts them far above Orlando’s median income of $35,732 a year, and above the US median income of $51,017.

When the US government calculates the poverty rate, they always exclude government benefits. The reason is simple: Most people who work for a living actually make far less money than America’s new entrepreneurs. The most lucrative business is young women having children out of wedlock. Forget college, the average college graduate only makes $44,000 a year upon graduation, which takes four years. By the age of 20, a young woman can be living the high life with almost no effort. All she has to do is get pregnant a few times.

My sister is proof of that. This story is repeated millions of times all over this country, and it is the reason why we will be a third world nation before the middle of this century.

To all of those people who claim that police are the only ones we can trust to carry a weapon, because they are so much more trustworthy than everyone else, explain this:

The Orlando Police Department on Wednesday released a 911 call of a
witness who says a marked police cruiser left the scene of an accident
that injured a bicyclist.

Now that I am dating a new woman for the first time in a long while, I am facing a problem that many in the gun community face: how your date feels about guns in general, and concealed carry in particular.

My new girlfriend was born and raised in New York. The attitude that is fostered there when it comes to guns in pretty well known to those of us in the gun community. My current girlfriend’s opinion towards guns is a sticky problem, but not insurmountable.

She has never fired a gun before, but says that she would love to learn how to shoot. She has never even HELD a firearm before. As far as concealed carry, she states that she once went alone on a 5,000 mile road trip up I95 from Florida to Maine, across to Chicago, and back down to Florida without needing a gun, so she doesn’t see why I feel the need to carry one. After all, she reasons, if an unescorted woman can make a long trip like that without needing to carry a gun, why should a man need one?

We were at a baseball game this weekend (the Rays v the Yankees- she is a Yankees fan) and a fight broke out in the crowd. One of the trouble makers was being escorted out by a cop, and he decided to punch the cop in the face. The cop took the guy down hard with a leg sweep. The assailant landed on his face hard enough that I heard his face hit the concrete from 30 feet away. After it was over, she was visibly shaken, and told me that she doesn’t like violence, and it makes her sick to her stomach. (Of course, she keeps a baseball bat under her bed in case of burglars, so I guess she isn’t TOO afraid of violence. Women.)

I explained to her that I am morally opposed to the initiation of violence against anyone, and that I believe it to be morally wrong for one person to initiate force against another. With that being said, I also believe that we are each responsible for our own protection. I view carrying a firearm to be similar to having a fire extinguisher: It is good to own one in case there is a fire, because when you need one, nothing else will work as well. That doesn’t mean that you are hoping for a fire, just that you want to be prepared if there happens to be one.

Like fire extinguishers, certain situations and neighborhoods demand that you own different fire extinguishers and keep them closer at hand than do others. For example, Orlando has a violent crime rate of 10.34, which is more than double the average Florida rate of 4.87, while the community where she lives has a crime rate of just 1.15. Statistically, you are far less likely to need a firearm in her community than you are in Orlando, or even where I live (which has a violent crime rate of 3.91).

So for now, I have accepted that I just don’t carry when I am in her town. I know that the risk is not zero, the already unlikely event that would require a firearm is even less than where I live. We are talking 90% less. I will teach her to shoot using my .22LR Mosquito, and eventually she will come around to see that guns are not scary. Who knows, I may even stop carrying for good when in her town. We will meet in the middle, I am sure.

What is going to be hard is the road trip we are doing this summer. We are driving from here to New York to see her family. Even if I wanted to have a weapon, I cannot. That will be a new experience for me, as I have carried a weapon for over 20 years.

It is said that there are two political schools of thought: People who believe that everyone needs to be told what to do, and people who do not believe so. The busybodies who want to control everyone are the ones who seek political power, and it seems that they are taking a firm hold everywhere. We see this in Broward Palm Beach counties in South Florida:

An idea that drew national attention when Broward County School Board
Member Rosalind Osgood suggested the district needed a dress code for
parents and school events may have gained a little traction in Palm
Beach County as well.

Palm Beach County School Board Member Karen Brill on Wednesday said
she had asked Superintendent Wayne Gent to schedule a discussion item
for next week’s school board meeting on the idea of enforcing some sort
of dress standards for adults visiting schools or school-sponsored
events.

I think that school dress codes are needed during the day. After all, a certain amount of decorum is needed to foster a proper learning environment. However, setting a dress code up for anyone at school events has absolutely nothing to do with the learning environment, and everything to do with busybodies trying to control other people, to whit:

 “It’s just the right thing to do for parents to do to model good
behavior for their children,” Osgood said. “It’s really encouraging
children to dress to impress.”

Telling people how to parent and what to do. Look, do I think that some people dress like slobs, sluts, or just plain bums? Sure I do, but it is not my place to tell other people how to dress, simply because I don’t like it, and I expect the same courtesy from others.

South Florida, once being an area known for a “live and let live” philosophy, is being overrun by New York busybodies who want to make the area exactly like the busybody city of New York.

There are many who would have you believe that the economy is doing well. After all, the DOW is up, right?

There are many signs that the economy is not doing as well as some would have you believe. For example, there is a shortage of medications that paramedics rely on for treating their patients.From the article:

What is the cause of this shortage? The federal agencies seem to be
blaming each other, support organizations seem to be blaming the
manufacturers, and most seem to blame the regulators. All this makes
us—administrators of EMS systems—want to go swallow some Mentos and a
Diet Coke. 

 This is nothing new. I remember as far back as 2010, we were having to use medications several months past their expiration dates, because failing to do so would have meant the patient got no medication at all.

The Hungarian economist Janos Kornai coined the term “shortage economy” to describe the Soviet bloc’s centrally controlled economic policies.

A shortage of a certain item does not necessarily mean that the
item is not being produced; rather, it means that the amount of the good
demanded exceeds the amount supplied at a given price. Since the price for EMS drugs is zero from the standpoint of the consumer (thanks to EMTALA, health insurance, and Medicaid) this means that price for these drugs has become uncoupled from demand. Expect this to accelerate across the entire medical field as health care is paid for increasingly more often by Obamacare.