The secret service opened fire at someone who was armed and attempting to gain access to President Trump.
Uncategorized
Snitches Get Suspensions
A middle schooler reported that a fellow student had live ammunition at school. He received the same suspension as the kid with the ammo. Why? He waited 2 hours to say something.
The lesson here is keep your mouth shut
Gaming the Courts
The Battle of the Courts
We are in a situation where the courts are divided along ideological lines. In a continuation of yesterday’s post, we see that a judge in Nort Dakota has declared that, since the state constitution was established to ensure life, liberty, and happiness, women have a constitutional right to kill their unborn children, if that is what makes them happy.
So again, why can’t that same logic be used as an excuse to own artillery pieces, kill people that you don’t like, or use LSD while driving down the highway, if that is what makes you happy?
It is my opinion that judges walk into the court room with a preconceived idea as to how they want to decide the case, and then twist the law and the constitution to fit that view.
Lawfare
Atlas Shrugged
Now they are just stealing ideas from Ayn Rand.
National Labor Relations Board Administrative Law Judge Geoffrey Carter ordered Starbucks to reopen “within a reasonable period of time” two Ithaca locations that closed
Gaming the Courts
Make This Make Sense
The Ninth Circuit made this ruling on so called “sensitive places” where states can prohibit firearms:
- Parks, athletic facilities and similar areas. Gun bans there are likely constitutional.
- Playgrounds and youth centers. Gun bans there are likely constitutional.
- Bars and restaurants that serve alcohol. Gun bans there are likely constitutional.
- Places of amusement, including casinos, stadiums, amusement parks, zoos, museums and libraries. Gun bans there are likely constitutional.
- Parking areas connected to certain sensitive places. Gun bans there are likely constitutional.
- The private-property default rule. Hawaii’s rule banning guns on private property unless the owner gives consent orally, in writing or on a sign is likely constitutional.
- Places of worship. State-mandated gun bans there are likely unconstitutional, but nothing prevents the owner or operator from banning firearms.
- Gatherings that require a permit. Gun bans there are likely unconstitutional.
- Financial institutions. State-mandated gun bans there are likely unconstitutional, but nothing prevents the owner or operator from banning firearms.
- Hospitals and other medical facilities. State-mandated gun bans there are likely unconstitutional, but nothing prevents the owner or operator from banning firearms.
- Public transit. A broad ban on carrying guns on public transit is likely unconstitutional, but a narrower law allowing the carrying of unloaded and secured firearms would likely be constitutional.
It’s a Mish mash. It isn’t even consistent. Where in the Constitution is this even found? Where in the history and tradition of the country was there a ban on weapons in bard? Casinos? But not hospitals, churches, or banks?
If you argue that schools are sensitive places and rights can be suspended to protect children, then why not suspend the First Amendment there and disallow faggotry?
Our courts are just as partisan and divided as the citizens. It’s long past time to admit that this nation is too large and varied for one set of rules to work for everyone.
Anti American left
Double Standards
Burning the flag is protected speech, but signing one should get Trump indicted again?
If it weren’t for double standards, the left would have no standards at all.
Police State
Rights Watch Tab Clearing
Getting rid of a bunch of tabs that expose infringements on our rights, but that I just didn’t get time to write a post on:
- The Democrats want to pass a law codifying the Chevron deference.
- Forcing everyone to pass through magnetometers is a violation of search and seizure clause, but NY does it anyhow.
- HOTUS says that she won’t interfere with EC vote counting on J6, 2025. Of course she won’t. The interference will be completed in November.
- You can’t photograph things happening on Public Property unless you are a member of the official media, or you must pay money to a private company.