Privilege

My sister called me last night. She works as a teacher here in Central Florida. She was contacted earlier in the week by her Principal because the mother of one of her students contacted the Superintendent’s office to complain that her son was being “targeted” by his teacher, as evidenced by his poor grades and discipline problems. The district office is sending an administrator to my sister’s school, so that they can meet with my sister, her Principal, and the parent to discuss the problem.

The problem? The kid is being suspended for calling another kid a “nigger” while they were at lunch. My sister isn’t the one who wrote the referral, the Principal is. My sister, as the teacher, was required to email the parent, as per district policy. The mother was very angry and claimed that her child “doesn’t even know that word.” She then demanded that my sister call her so they could discuss it. My sister wisely refused, and wants everything dealt with in writing. So that is why the parent has complained.

As soon as I heard “targeted” I knew without being told that this was a black student who was going to throw down the race card. I told her that, since this was a discipline meeting, she was entitled to have her union representative there as a matter of Federal law. I don’t really like a lot of what the union does, but in this case, it’s important to remember that there will be two administrators and a parent there. You will be alone, and need a witness there that will be somewhat impartial.

When I told her that, my sister replied, “Oh, no. The principal told me that this wasn’t a meeting where I would be disciplined. It’s just an informal meeting.” No. There is no such thing as an informal meeting when there are multiple administrators in a room with a parent making racism accusations against you. You are white, and that means you are guilty. If either of those administrators can avoid trouble by tossing you in front of that bus, they will do it without a second thought. That’s when my sister said, “Oh my principal is black. She told me that she knows I am not a racist.”

Oh shit. It was at that point that I began to wonder whether or not my sister should bring not just a union rep, but a lawyer. If this woman wants to claim that racism is why her child is failing and getting in trouble, the only white person in the room is going to be the target.

Racism is a serious charge for a teacher. Not only will it cost you your job, it can cost you your teaching license. There goes your career, and my sister doesn’t have the looks for only fans.

I’ve seen this show before. I know how it turns out. You can win, but you need lawyers, representation, witnesses, and money. I got in that fight back in 2016, and I wound up quitting and going to a different school. The old school then tried to have my professional licenses revoked. They failed and I won, but it cost me nearly $10,000 in legal fees and I wound up switching jobs.

I don’t think that my sister has that kind of money.

So when the meeting happens this week, she will have a union representative there. At least she took my advice. She usually asks for my advice, then goes in a different direction. Then she comes to me and wants advice on the situation that she got into because she didn’t follow my original advice. Wash. Rinse. Repeat.

Threat to Democracy?

The left is absolutely incensed that they have to follow the rules as two Tennessee lawmakers are expelled:

They claim that the three were facing expulsion because they were protesting. As usual, the left only tells half of the story. They weren’t merely protesting, they were refusing to allow the remainder of the legislature to carry out the business of the people, and were getting the protesters in the gallery to assist them. (This is where I would usually post video of what they did, but youtube has removed most of the videos from their site, and the one that I could find on their site won’t embed. I can’t find a single video of what they did to get expelled. Odd, huh?)

The next claim is that it is an attack on democracy. I don’t see how. The voters in Tennessee are represented by their democratically elected representatives. Those representatives, all 99 of them, were prevented from doing their jobs by an unruly mob, led by three of their members. The representatives all operate by an agreed upon set of rules. Violating those rules can cause the members to expel you by a 2/3 vote. The three refused to abide by the rules and held the entire body hostage, so the members took a vote, and two of them were expelled. Seems mighty democratic to me. Majority rules.

Expelling someone is a threat to democracy? You tried to expel the President. Twice. Was that a threat to democracy? When republican protesters attempted to hold a similar protest in Congress more than two years ago, you said that such protests were an insurrection. Hundreds of the protesters are still being held without trial.

Things continue to heat up on the road to CW2. It’s coming, unfortunately. I can feel it.

This is Why They Want Your Guns

Will Smith is notoriously antigun. He has repeatedly said that he hates guns and the gun culture.

So it comes to me as no surprise that he wants to eliminate people with whom he disagrees.

They are becoming bold enough to finally begin saying the quiet part out loud. They want to take your guns, and then they want to cleanse you from the country. Scratch any antigunner, and you find an authoritarian that wants to eliminate anyone who stands in their way.

Will Smith is a cuckold who let his wife sleep with other men because she wanted to.

On why they decided against monogamy, Will explained: “Jada never believed in conventional marriage.”

So it’s obvious that, although he wants to eliminate people whose politics don’t agree with his own, he isn’t going to be the one to kick in doors. He isn’t coming to take your guns, he can’t even keep his wife from screwing other dudes.

Things That Didn’t Happen for $500, Alex

Melissa Joan Hart, in an effort to get in the news, claims to have helped a class of kindergarteners escape from the Nashville shooting by escorting them out of the woods and across a highway. How do I know this? Because the school was LOCKED DOWN, and on the bodycam video, a school administrator tells the arriving cops that all but two of the students are accounted for. Hart’s story is the only one that talks about 6 year old kids escaping on foot.

Attention whores aren’t helping.

In the meantime, she calls gun owners “the enemy”

Hey, ATF. Have you seen this?

I had a pro-2A friend of mine say that we should support the left’s right to 2A, and if we don’t, we are part of the problem. I disagree. I think it was Tam over at “Books Bikes and Boomsticks” who once said that there is a difference between open carrying and open carrying AT someone.

When you are openly stating that you want to use your 2A rights to attack someone for merely disagreeing with you, that isn’t how the 2A works. If you want a war, then I am not interested in being fair. I am interested in winning. With that in mind:

There is nothing like posting a picture of yourself with an illegal SBR while openly advocating for a terror attack. I’m sure the FBI and ATF will be all over this.

Or not. And just so we are clear, here is a picture of one of the “christcucks” that was killed by a deviant, delusional tranny this week. Tell me again how they deserved this, you deviant assholes.

This is Pastor Chad Scruggs and his daughter Hallie Scruggs.
Hallie was brutally massacred along with 3 of her classmates at a Christian school in Nashville by a radical transgender activist.

That evil piece of shit targeted a Christian school filled with little kids and unarmed adults because they were defenseless and had no security. You want a fight, then let’s do it. I don’t want one, and I think it would be a disaster for everyone, but better that, than watching you massacre little kids.

Edited to add:

End Edit